White lentiginosis of Grosshans: which mode of inheritance?

Author(s):  
R. Happle
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
H. D. Geissinge ◽  
L.D. Rhodes

A recently discovered mouse model (‘mdx’) for muscular dystrophy in man may be of considerable interest, since the disease in ‘mdx’ mice is inherited by the same mode of inheritance (X-linked) as the human Duchenne (DMD) muscular dystrophy. Unlike DMD, which results in a situation in which the continual muscle destruction cannot keep up with abortive regenerative attempts of the musculature, and the sufferers of the disease die early, the disease in ‘mdx’ mice appears to be transient, and the mice do not die as a result of it. In fact, it has been reported that the severely damaged Tibialis anterior (TA) muscles of ‘mdx’ mice seem to display exceptionally good regenerative powers at 4-6 weeks, so much so, that these muscles are able to regenerate spontaneously up to their previous levels of physiological activity.


1981 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
P. R. Burch
Keyword(s):  

Crop Science ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Christopher ◽  
D. Atsmon ◽  
M. Feldman

Author(s):  
Richard Frankham ◽  
Jonathan D. Ballou ◽  
Katherine Ralls ◽  
Mark D. B. Eldridge ◽  
Michele R. Dudash ◽  
...  

The risks of inbreeding and outbreeding depression, and the prospects for genetic rescue are often different in species with alternative mating systems and mode of inheritance (compared to outbreeding diploids), such as self-incompatible, self-fertilizing, mixed mating, non-diploid (haploid, haplodiploid and polyploid) and asexual.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 2657-2673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Emily

The Cochran-Armitage trend test (CA) has become a standard procedure for association testing in large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, when the disease model is unknown, there is no consensus on the most powerful test to be used between CA, allelic, and genotypic tests. In this article, we tackle the question of whether CA is best suited to single-locus scanning in GWAS and propose a power comparison of CA against allelic and genotypic tests. Our approach relies on the evaluation of the Taylor decompositions of non-centrality parameters, thus allowing an analytical comparison of the power functions of the tests. Compared to simulation-based comparison, our approach offers the advantage of simultaneously accounting for the multidimensionality of the set of features involved in power functions. Although power for CA depends on the sample size, the case-to-control ratio and the minor allelic frequency (MAF), our results first show that it is largely influenced by the mode of inheritance and a deviation from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). Furthermore, when compared to other tests, CA is shown to be the most powerful test under a multiplicative disease model or when the single-nucleotide polymorphism largely deviates from HWE. In all other situations, CA lacks in power and differences can be substantial, especially for the recessive mode of inheritance. Finally, our results are illustrated by the comparison of the performances of the statistics in two genome scans.


1989 ◽  
Vol &NA; (244) ◽  
pp. 281???292 ◽  
Author(s):  
PHILIP B. VASSEUR ◽  
PATRICK FOLEY ◽  
SHARON STEVENSON ◽  
DAVID HEITTER

1998 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Greenberg ◽  
Susan E. Hodge ◽  
Veronica J. Vieland ◽  
M. Anne Spence

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document