scholarly journals Mitigating primary care provider burnout with interdisciplinary dyads and shared care delivery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison A. Norful ◽  
Yun He ◽  
Adam Rosenfeld ◽  
Cilgy M. Abraham ◽  
Bernard Chang
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Shared Care

P2-275: DEMENTIA CARE INTEGRATION BETWEEN PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER AND TERTIARY HOSPITALIST: AN INNOVATIVE DEMENTIA SHARED CARE MODEL

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P577-P577
Author(s):  
Mei Sian Chong ◽  
Colin Tan ◽  
Cindy Yeo ◽  
Kang Yih Low ◽  
Philomena Anthony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Care Integration ◽  
Shared Care Model

scholarly journals Using CBPR to Decrease Health Disparities in a Suburban Latino Neighborhood

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren J. Coffman ◽  
Brisa Urquieta de Hernandez ◽  
Heather A. Smith ◽  
Andrew McWilliams ◽  
Yhenneko J. Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Access To Health Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Community Based

Introduction: This project tested the feasibility of using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to deliver health and social resources in two high-risk, suburban neighborhoods. Method: An established research network was used to engage stakeholders to design and deliver a neighborhood-based intervention targeting a Latino immigrant population. The intervention provided screenings for hypertension, diabetes, and depression; primary care provider visits; and information about navigating health care delivery systems and related community-based resources. Participants ( N = 216) were consented for participation and their subsequent use of health and social services were measured at baseline and 1 year post intervention. Results: At baseline, 5.1% of participants had health insurance, 16.7% had a primary care provider, and 38.4% had a chronic illness. SF-12 scores showed a majority of participants with low perceived health status (56%) and high risk for clinical depression (33%). Self-reported use of primary care services increased from 33.8% at baseline to 48% 1 year after the intervention, and 62% reported use of social services. Conclusion: Neighborhood-based interventions informed by a CBPR approach are effective in both identifying community members who lack access to health care–related services and connecting them into needed primary care and social services.

scholarly journals Primary care provider perceptions of intake transition records and shared care with outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Yee ◽  
Karen Unsworth ◽  
Neville Suskin ◽  
Robert D Reid ◽  
Veronica Jamnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Provider Perceptions ◽  
Rehabilitation Programs

Shared Care: Using an Electronic Consult Form to Facilitate Primary Care Provider–Specialty Care Coordination

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 797-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna J. Rea ◽  
Larissa M. Wenren ◽  
Katherine D. Tran ◽  
Eric Zwemer ◽  
Daniel Mallon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Specialty Care ◽  
Shared Care

scholarly journals Integrating Genomic Screening into Primary Care: Provider Experiences Caring for Latino Patients at a Community-Based Health Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
Tarika Srinivasan ◽  
Erica J. Sutton ◽  
Annika T. Beck ◽  
Idali Cuellar ◽  
Valentina Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Genomic Sequencing ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Genomic Screening

Introduction: Minority communities have had limited access to advances in genomic medicine. Mayo Clinic and Mountain Park Health Center, a Federally Qualified Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona, partnered to assess the feasibility of offering genomic screening to Latino patients receiving care at a community-based health center. We examined primary care provider (PCP) experiences reporting genomic screening results and integrating those results into patient care. Methods: We conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with PCPs and other members of the health care team charged with supporting patients who received positive genomic screening results. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Results: Of the 500 patients who pursued genomic screening, 10 received results indicating a genetic variant that warranted clinical management. PCPs felt genomic screening was valuable to patients and their families, and that genomic research should strive to include underrepresented minorities. Providers identified multiple challenges integrating genomic sequencing into patient care, including difficulties maintaining patient contact over time; arranging follow-up medical care; and managing results in an environment with limited genetics expertise. Providers also reflected on the ethics of offering genomic sequencing to patients who may not be able to pursue diagnostic testing or follow-up care due to financial constraints. Conclusions: Our results highlight the potential benefits and challenges of bringing advances in precision medicine to community-based health centers serving under-resourced populations. By proactively considering patient support needs, and identifying financial assistance programs and patient-referral mechanisms to support patients who may need specialized medical care, PCPs and other health care providers can help to ensure that precision medicine lives up to its full potential as a tool for improving patient care.

Interventions to improve primary care provider management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A. Croce ◽  
Fabiana C. P. S. Lopes ◽  
Jennifer Ruth ◽  
Jonathan I. Silverberg
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider

Parent and Primary Care Provider Priorities for Wellness in Early Childhood: A Discrete Choice Experiment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Mayne ◽  
Chloe Hannan ◽  
Jennifer Faerber ◽  
Rupreet Anand ◽  
Ella Labrusciano-Carris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Choice Experiment

scholarly journals The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Omar Farooq ◽  
Ameer Farooq ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Raza Qadri ◽  
Tanner Steed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Rectal Cancers

Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is considered an important part of the physical examination. However, it is unclear how many patients have a DRE performed at the primary care level in the work-up of rectal cancer, and if the absence of a DRE causes a delay to consultation with a specialist. Methods: A retrospective patient questionnaire was sent to 1000 consecutive patients with stage II or stage III rectal cancer. The questionnaire asked patients to recall if they had a DRE performed by their general practitioner (GP) when they first presented with symptoms or a positive FIT test. Demographic data, staging data, and time to consultation with a specialist were also collected. Results: A thousand surveys were mailed out, and a total of 262 patients responded. Of the respondents, 46.2% did not recall undergoing a digital rectal examination by their primary care provider. Women were less likely to undergo a DRE than men (28.6% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.019). While there was a trend towards longer times to specialist consultation in patients who did not undergo a DRE (27.0 vs. 12.2 weeks), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients who are FIT positive or have symptomatic rectal bleeding do not recall having a DRE by their primary care provider. Barriers may include lack of comfort with performing DRE or lack of time. Clearer guidelines and more support for GP’s may increase uptake of DRE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document