Complete-arch Implant-supported Composite Pressed Restorations Fixed Dental Prostheses

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 3006-3009
Author(s):  
Sorin Gheorghe Mihali ◽  
Emanuel Adrian Bratu ◽  
Laura Cristina Rusu
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal Framework ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Function Range ◽  
Composite Restoration

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the composite pressed on metal framework for full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in order to eliminate the drawbacks related to the chipping of porcelain fused to metal or to zirconia restorations. Sixteen patients received 22 implant-supported screw-cement-retained complete-arch restorations, consisting of composite pressed restorations. All patients were follow-up visit up to 2 years on function (range 24 to 30 months, mean 28.3 months). The outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival rates and calculations of wear determination (mm). After two years of function, the wear values were 95.54�6.88 mm on pressed composite restoration. Using composite pressed restorations appears to be a predictable, esthetic and successful treatment option for method of full arch restorations over implants.

Clinical Outcomes in Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis Utilizing Pressed Composite Restorations

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-799
Author(s):  
Sorin Gheorghe Mihali ◽  
Emanuel Adrian Bratu
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Dental Ceramic ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Metal Framework ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

The author wants to evaluate the clinical advantages and limitations of the composite pressed on metal framework for full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in comparing with dental ceramic restorations. A total of thirty-two edentulous arches were restored. All complications were recorded at each follow-up visit up to 1 year after insertion. No complications were reported on pressed composite restoration. Complications were found in the ceramic restorations like chipping or fracture of the ceramic veneer. The composite pressed restorations are a treatment option for full arch restorations over implants, showing a better success rate in the present study in comparing with ceramic restorations.

scholarly journals Survival and Success of ITI Implants and Prostheses: Retrospective Study of Cases with 5-Year Follow-Up

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig ◽  
Mehmet Yaltirik ◽  
Senem Ozer ◽  
Ebru Demet Tuncer ◽  
Gulumser Evlioglu
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Sample Number ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Osseointegrated Implants ◽  
Material Fracture ◽  
Observation Period

ABSTRACTObjectives: The use of osseointegrated implants as an endoestal anchorage device to provide support for dental prostheses is a reliable and widely accepted treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of non-submerged implants placed in the maxilla or in the mandible.Methods: A total of 146 International Team for Implantology (ITI) (Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland) implants were placed in 42 patients (20 women, 22 men, mean age 42). The cases were examined retrospectively in order to evaluate the clinical efficiency of non-submerged ITI implants and to determine the success rate of implant retained/supported prosthesis after a 5-year period. All implants were assessed clinically and radiographically on a yearly basis.Results: The 5-year cumulative success rates for maxillary and mandibular implants were 91.00% and 97.81%, respectively. The most common prosthetic complication was abutment accompanied by screw loosing (3.42%). Veneering material fracture was documented in only one patient.Conclusions: Within the limitations of the observation period and sample number, the present findings confirmed sufficient success and survival rates of ITI implants placed in mandible as well as implants placed in the maxilla after a 5-year period. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:42-49)

scholarly journals Two-Year Longevity of Posterior Zirconia Multi-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses with Monolithic Occlusal Surface

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4449
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Pahncke ◽  
Sebastian Hahnel ◽  
Oliver Schierz ◽  
Michael Benno Schmidt ◽  
Anne Schmutzler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Recall Interval ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Occlusal Surfaces ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Posterior Area

In this prospective clinical trial we observed the 2-year clinical performance of posterior tooth-supported multi-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) fabricated from zirconia with monolithic occlusal surfaces. Fifty multi-unit FDPs were inserted in 50 patients. After two years of clinical service, 43 restorations were reexamined as one patient had died and six patients were not available for recall. Two biological (root canal treatment: 12 and 14 months) and one technical (debonding: 12 months) complications occurred. According to the Kaplan–Meier analysis, the success rate was 93.7%, and the survival rate was 100%. The six patients who were not available for regular 2-year follow-up were examined after the official 2-year recall interval, and none of the FDPs presented complications or failures. Within the limitations of the current study, the use of multi-unit FDPs with monolithic occlusal surfaces fabricated from zirconia can be recommended for short-term use in the posterior area.

Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. SCHMITTER ◽  
K. MUSSOTTER ◽  
P. RAMMELSBERG ◽  
O. GABBERT ◽  
B. OHLMANN
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

Clinical performance of extended zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: two-year results

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. SCHMITTER ◽  
K. MUSSOTTER ◽  
P. RAMMELSBERG ◽  
T. STOBER ◽  
B. OHLMANN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses

scholarly journals DENTAL PROSTHESIS;

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (08) ◽  
pp. 1261-1264
Author(s):  
Wasiq Riaz ◽  
Ayesha Aslam ◽  
Sara Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Class I ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
History Of Use ◽  
Study Setting

Introduction: Fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) are still preferred owing to theirdurability, esthetics, cost-effectiveness, adequate retention and lack of a surgical procedure.These restorations generally demonstrate longer life and durability in clinical service. Despitethe high survival rates, FDP complications are frequently encountered. Although severalstudies have reported on complications associated with FDPs, there is a lack of a standardand universal reporting system for FDP failures. Objectives: To evaluate FDP failures using aneasy classification scheme relevant to all conventional FDP failures. To assess the prevalenceof FDP failures based on this system. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: MargallaInstitute of Health Sciences (MIHS), Rawalpindi. Period: From 20th July 2014 to 20th January2015. Materials and Methods: Subjects reporting to the outpatient department with complaintsof failed crowns or bridges were included in the study. FDP failures were classified accordingto Manappallil’s classification. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. Descriptive statisticswere calculated. Results: Majority (31.6%) of the FDP failures were classified as Class I failureswhile the second most common FDP failures belonged to Class IV with a prevalence of 30.1%.Majority of the study subjects had been wearing FDPs for a period of 2 – 5 years while a few(2%) reported a history of use of FDP for more than 15 years. Conclusion: Class I failures arethe most prevalent failures in FPDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document