Concurrent and predictive validity of the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short‐Form and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in older stroke rehabilitation patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nishioka ◽  
K. Omagari ◽  
E. Nishioka ◽  
N. Mori ◽  
Y. Taketani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Stroke Rehabilitation ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

scholarly journals AN EVALUATION OF NUTRITIONAL INDEXES FOR TO PREDICTION THE HOSPITALIZATION DURATION IN ELDERLY CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS

2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
B. Buyukaydin ◽  
A.T. Isik ◽  
P. Soysal ◽  
M. Alay ◽  
R. Kazancioglu
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index

Objective: Chronic kidney disease and malnutrition are serious and frequently encountered co-morbidities among older patients. We evaluated nutritional status of older pre-dialysis patients and the effect of malnutrition on length of stay (LOS) in hospital. Materials and Methods: 65 years and over 33 hospitalized pre-dialysis patients with glomerular filtration rate between 10-30ml/min/1.73m2 were included. There is no control group. For all patients, biochemical analysis was performed. The malnutrition risk was evaluated with Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and LOS in hospital was recorded. Results: Mean GNRI was 98.4±12.9 and the mean MNA-SF was 8±3.15. For all patients, mean LOS was 10.58±9 days. According to MNA-SF, malnourished patients’ LOS was longer and a difference was observed between MNA-SF and GNRI in terms of LOS prediction (p=0.005, p=0.230). Conclusion: For older pre-dialysis patients, MNA-SF is probably a more sensitive index in terms of LOS in hospital prediction.

scholarly journals The Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index versus the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form in predicting postoperative delirium and hospital length of stay among older non-cardiac surgical patients: a prospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Zhao ◽  
Ning Ge ◽  
Dongmei Xie ◽  
Langli Gao ◽  
Yanyan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Delirium ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Surgical Patients

Abstract Backgrounds: Malnutrition has been shown to be associated with a poor prognosis in older surgical patients. Several tools are available for detecting malnutrition. But little is known about their ability to assess risks of postoperative adverse outcomes. The study aimed to compare the ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) in predicting postoperative delirium (POD) and length of stay (LOS) among older non-cardiac surgical patients. Methods : Prospective study of 288 older non-cardiac surgical patients from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the GNRI and MNA-SF, and patients were followed for the occurrence of POD and LOS. Multivariate logistic regression and linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of these outcomes. The relative performance of the GNRI and MNA-SF as predictors of these outcomes were determined by Receive Operator Characteristic curves (ROC) analyses and the area under the curve (AUC). Results : Multivariate analysis revealed that high nutritional risk (GNRI < 92) and malnutrition/ risk of malnutrition (MNA-SF < 8 and MNA-SF=8-11) were significantly associated with POD. Linear regression analysis showed that low/high nutritional risk (GNRI=92-98 and GNRI < 92) and malnutrition (MNA-SF < 8) were independent predictors of prolonged LOS. Moreover, the area under the curve (AUC) of MNA-SF scores (AUC=0.718, P <0.001, 95%CI: 0.64-0.80) for POD was better than GNRI scores (AUC=0.606, P= 0.019, 95%CI: 0.52-0.69), whereas, GNRI scores (AUC=0.611, P= 0.006, 95%CI: 0.54-0.69) had larger AUC when predicting prolonged LOS as compared to MNA-SF scores (AUC=0.533, P= 0.421, 95%CI: 0.45-0.62). Conclusion : The GNRI was more effective than the MNA-SF at predicting prolonged LOS, but the MNA-SF was a superior predictor of POD in older non-cardiac surgical patients.

scholarly journals Nutritional status and screening tools to detect nutritional risk in hospitalized patients with hepatic echinococcosis

Parasite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Zhan Wang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ge Song ◽  
MingQuan Pang ◽  
Bin Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002

Background: Echinococcosis is a chronic consumptive liver disease. Little research has been carried out on the nutritional status of infected patients, though liver diseases are often associated with malnutrition. Our study investigated four different nutrition screening tools, to assess nutritional risks of hospitalized patients with echinococcosis. Methods: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Short Form of Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), and the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI) were used to assess 164 patients with alveolar echinococcosis (AE) and 232 with cystic echinococcosis (CE). Results were then compared with European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria for malnutrition diagnosis. Results: According to ESPEN standards for malnutrition diagnosis, 29.2% of CE patients and 31.1% of AE patients were malnourished. The malnutrition risk rates for CE and AE patients were as follows: NRS 2002 – 40.3% and 30.7%; MUST – 51.5% and 50.9%; MNA-SF – 46.8% and 44.1%; and NRI – 51.1% and 67.4%. In patients with CE, MNA-SF and NRS 2002 results correlated well with ESPEN results (k = 0.515, 0.496). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) values of MNA-SF and NRS 2002 were 0.803 and 0.776, respectively. For patients with AE, NRS 2002 and MNA-SF results correlated well with ESPEN (k = 0.555, 0.493). AUC values of NRS 2002 and MNA-SF were 0.776 and 0.792, respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first to analyze hospitalized echinococcosis patients based on these nutritional screening tools. Our results suggest that NRS 2002 and MNA-SF are suitable tools for nutritional screening of inpatients with echinococcosis.

scholarly journals Triagem nutricional em adultos hospitalizados

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariur Gomes Beghetto ◽  
Bibiana Manna ◽  
Andréia Candal ◽  
Elza Daniel de Mello ◽  
Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tool ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Mini Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Nutrition Risk ◽  
Nutritional Risk Index ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Em hospitais, o objetivo de um procedimento de triagem nutricional é identificar indivíduos desnutridos ou em risco de desnutrição, possibilitando intervenção nutricional precoce e melhor alocação de recursos. Diferentes métodos são apresentados na literatura para esta finalidade: Malnutrition Screening Tool, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Nutritional Risk Index, Nutrition Risk Score, Nutritional Risk Screening, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Nutritional Screening Tool, Nutritional Screening Equation. No entanto, o emprego de muitos destes instrumentos está limitado pela inadequada metodologia empregada na derivação e/ou validação, pela seleção de grupos específicos de pacientes, pela pouca praticidade ou por necessidade de um especialista para seu emprego. Na ausência de um padrão de referência para emitir o diagnóstico nutricional, desfechos clínicos relevantes devem balizar a derivação e a validação de novos instrumentos. Este trabalho descreve os instrumentos de triagem nutricional acima referidos e apresenta considerações quanto ao seu emprego para adultos hospitalizados não selecionados.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document