scholarly journals Welfare recipients’ transition into employment and employment stability in Germany

Labour ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Dengler ◽  
Katrin Hohmeyer ◽  
Cordula Zabel
2006 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 118-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Miller

Using a unique data set from the US to examine the association between employment stability and childcare stability, we find that childcare use is fairly stable for current and former welfare recipients. In addition, although childcare instability contributes to employment instability, it does not appear to be the major reason women leave their jobs. In this case, employment retention programmes in the US, while not losing focus on childcare issues, should also address other barriers to keeping jobs, such as limited education and lack of work experience.


2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Brambilla ◽  
David A. Butz

Two studies examined the impact of macrolevel symbolic threat on intergroup attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 71), participants exposed to a macrosymbolic threat (vs. nonsymbolic threat and neutral topic) reported less support toward social policies concerning gay men, an outgroup whose stereotypes implies a threat to values, but not toward welfare recipients, a social group whose stereotypes do not imply a threat to values. Study 2 (N = 78) showed that, whereas macrolevel symbolic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward gay men, macroeconomic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward Asians, an outgroup whose stereotypes imply an economic threat. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the role of a general climate of threat in shaping intergroup attitudes.


Author(s):  
Surjeet K. Ahluwalia ◽  
Sharon M. McGroder ◽  
Martha J. Zaslow ◽  
Elizabeth C. Hair

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Tout ◽  
Juliet Scarpa ◽  
Martha J. Zaslow

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
JOYCE FRIEDEN

Author(s):  
Emile Cammeraat ◽  
Egbert Jongen ◽  
Pierre Koning

AbstractWe study the impact of mandatory activation programs for young welfare recipients in the Netherlands. What makes this reform unique is that it clashed head on with the Great Recession. We use differences-in-differences and data for the period 1999–2012 to estimate the effects of this reform. We find that the reform reduced the number of welfare recipients but had no effect on the number of NEETs (individuals not in employment, education or training). The absence of employment effects contrasts with previous studies on the impact of mandatory activation programs, which we argue is due to the reform taking place during a severe economic recession.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document