Children of Current and Former Welfare Recipients: Similarly at Risk

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Tout ◽  
Juliet Scarpa ◽  
Martha J. Zaslow
2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Morris ◽  
Janaki Santhiveeran ◽  
Brian Trung Lam

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernie Lightman ◽  
Andrew Mitchell ◽  
Dean Herd

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora P. Jackson ◽  
Peter M. Bentler ◽  
Todd M. Franke

2006 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 118-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Miller

Using a unique data set from the US to examine the association between employment stability and childcare stability, we find that childcare use is fairly stable for current and former welfare recipients. In addition, although childcare instability contributes to employment instability, it does not appear to be the major reason women leave their jobs. In this case, employment retention programmes in the US, while not losing focus on childcare issues, should also address other barriers to keeping jobs, such as limited education and lack of work experience.


2003 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyrone Chiwai Cheng

With welfare reform soundly launched and its effects already praised, it is time to examine its impact on former welfare recipients. A typology of adaptation to welfare—comprising dependency, supplementation, self-reliance, and autonomy—was developed based on former welfare recipients' financial status and employment status. An examination was also made of ways in which welfare recipients changed from more independent modes of adaptation (autonomy and self-reliance) to less independent modes (supplementation and dependency). Using longitudinal data extracted from a U. S. Department of Labor survey, event history analysis was applied to investigate changes in adaptation mode and factors contributing to these changes, among former welfare recipients across a period of 1 8 years. The investigation found that return to welfare was uncommon. Furthermore, the results show that nonpoor former recipients most often joined the ranks of the working poor because of welfare reform, ethnicity, education level, occupational skills, family income, housing subsidy, child care, and prior experience in welfare use. Some nonpoor former recipients who spent long spells in welfare returned to welfare because they suffered income reductions and needed food stamps. Working poor former recipients were likely to become nonpoor if they were married and had no need for child care or food stamps. Working poor White, single mothers with little work experience and little child support were likely to return to welfare and become further dependent on it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document