Inpatient Suicide Second Victim Experience and Support Tool: Psychometric properties of a scale for nurses who experienced inpatient suicide at Chinese general hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1111-1120
Author(s):  
Rong Tan ◽  
Kaiyan Luo ◽  
Deying Hu ◽  
Yue Zhao ◽  
Yanhong Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
General Hospitals ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Inpatient Suicide ◽  
Second Victim

Psychometric Properties of Korean Version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (K-SVEST)

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Mi Kim ◽  
Sun-Aee Kim ◽  
Ju-Ry Lee ◽  
Jonathan D. Burlison ◽  
Eui Geum Oh
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Korean Version ◽  
Second Victim

Second Victim Experience and Support Tool

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Pieretti ◽  
Luca Bastiani ◽  
Tommaso Bellandi ◽  
Sabrina Molinaro ◽  
Paolo Zoppi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Tool ◽  
Second Victim

Psychometric properties of a decision-support tool for the era of managed care

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Glazer ◽  
Geoffrey V. Gray
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Managed Care ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Support Tool

Validation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien M. Winning ◽  
Jenna Merandi ◽  
Joseph R. Rausch ◽  
Nancy Liao ◽  
James M. Hoffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Second Victim

Second victim experiences of nurses in obstetrics and gynaecology: A Second Victim Experience and Support Tool Survey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn E. Finney ◽  
Vanessa E. Torbenson ◽  
Kirsten A. Riggan ◽  
Amy L. Weaver ◽  
Margaret E. Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Tool ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Second Victim

Evaluation of a second victim peer support program on perceptions of second victim experiences and supportive resources in pediatric clinical specialties using the second victim experience and support tool (SVEST)

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 312-317
Author(s):  
Robyn E. Finney ◽  
Scott Czinski ◽  
Kelly Fjerstad ◽  
Grace M. Arteaga ◽  
Amy L. Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Program ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Second Victim ◽  
Peer Support Program

Validation of the Danish version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 140349482110048
Author(s):  
Tine Knudsen ◽  
Charlotte Abrahamsen ◽  
Jan S. Jørgensen ◽  
Katja Schrøder
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Turnover Intentions ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Measurement Scale ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Danish Version ◽  
Victim Support ◽  
Second Victim

Objective: Health-care professionals (HCPs) who are involved in an unanticipated adverse patient event, a medical error or a patient-related injury can become second victims. Being a second victim can lead to various symptoms, affecting the well-being of HCPs and possible turnover intentions or absenteeism. An increasing number of hospitals have implemented a second-victim support programme. To achieve unique insights into what works and what does not work in second-victim support programmes, HCPs’ perceptions are needed. The aim of this study was to translate the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) into Danish and test the psychometric properties of the Danish version (D-SVEST). Methods: The SVEST self-administered questionnaire was translated into Danish following the World Health Organization’s guidelines. Assessments of the content validity, construct validity and internal consistency were performed based on 171 participants. Results: The study demonstrated that the D-SVEST is content valid and fits the a priori defined structure. Yet, four items revealed unacceptable factor loadings (<0.4) and item-rest correlations <0.3. All Cronbach’s alpha estimates for these five dimensions exceeded 0.70. The dimensions on colleague and institutional support did not contribute to the validity. Conclusions: In conclusion, the D-SVEST is considered relevant and valid for measuring second-victim experiences and the adequacy of support resources. However, we recommend a modification of items 9 and 25 to enhance the measurement scale in a Danish context. The D-SVEST can be used by health-care management at Danish hospitals.

The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Scarpis ◽  
Luigi Castriotta ◽  
Edoardo Ruscio ◽  
Beatrice Bianchet ◽  
Anna Doimo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Tool ◽  
Second Victim

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (C‐SVEST)

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1416-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaojiao Chen ◽  
Qiao Yang ◽  
Qinghua Zhao ◽  
Shuangjiang Zheng ◽  
Mingzhao Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Version ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Second Victim

Second Victim Experience and Support Tool: cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Scarpis ◽  
E Ruscio ◽  
B Bianchet ◽  
A Doimo ◽  
V Moretti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
World Health ◽  
Italian Version ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Second Victim

Abstract Background ”Second victims” are defined as “healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in an unanticipated adverse patient event, who experienced professional and psychological distress”. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) is a survey developed and validated in the United States, which describes the experience of second victims. This study aims to perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the SVEST and to evaluate its psychometric characteristics in the Italian context. Methods The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was performed according to the World Health Organization’s guidelines, from March to May 2019. Then HCWs involved in direct patient care (a potential second victim) were asked to complete the Italian version of SVEST in a validation survey, from June to November 2019 at the Academic Hospital of Udine. SVEST consists of 29 items, divided into 7 dimensions, 2 outcome variables and 7 support options. The IT-SVEST was assessed for internal consistency through Cronbach’s α, for content validity with Content Validity Index for Scales (S-CVI) and for Item (I-CVI) and for construct validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results Collected surveys were 349. Women were 79.4%. Nurses were 40.1%, 18.9% were doctors and 8.6% were residents. HCWs involved in a patients’ adverse event were 205 (58.7%). Out of these, 66.3% were near misses. The internal consistency of the instrument was adequate in its overall evaluation with Cronbach α = 0.88 (95% C.I.=0.86). S-CVI was 0.94 and I-CVI was 0.70. The CFA results showed a good model fit for the nine-factor structure (chi2=676.18, 327 df, p &lt; 0.001). Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation, Akaike’s information criterion, Comparative Fix Index Tucker-Lewis Index values also suggested a good fit to the data. Conclusions The Italian version of the SVEST (IT-SVEST) can be used to evaluate second victim experiences, demonstrating adequate validity, reliability and good psychometric properties. Key messages Healthcare institutions need an instrument that can direct efforts to prevent and reduce the second victim experience. IT-SVEST is a reliable and valid instrument to obtain accurate information on second victim experience.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document