Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 462-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy Marie Fields ◽  
James Douglas Calvert
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Johnson ◽  
Jane M. Carrington

It is estimated 1 in 3 clinical trials utilize a wearable device to gather real-time participant data, including sleep habits, telemetry, and physical activity. While wearable technologies (including smart watches, USBs, and implantable devices) have been revolutionary in their ability to provide a higher precision and accuracy to data acquisition external to the research milieu, there is hesitancy among providers and participants alike given security concerns, perception of cyber-related threats, and meaning attributed to privacy issues. The purpose of this research is to define cyber-situational awareness (CSA) as it pertains to clinical trials, evaluate its current measurement, and describe best practices for research investigators and trial participants to enhance protections in the digital age. This paper reviews integrated elements of CSA within the process of informed consent when wearable devices are implemented for trial procedures. Evaluation of CSA as part of informed consent allows the research site to support the participant in knowledge gaps surrounding the technology while also providing feedback to the trial sponsor as to technology improvements to enhance usability and wearability of the device.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet R. Aiken ◽  
Paul J. Hanges

Big data is becoming a buzzword in today's corporate language and lay discussions. From individually targeting advertising based on previous consumer behavior or Internet searches to debates by Congress concerning National Security Agency (NSA) access to phone metadata, the era of big data has arrived. Thus, the Guzzo, Fink, King, Tonidandel, and Landis (2015) discussion of the challenges (e.g., confidentiality, informed consent) that big data projects present to industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists is timely. If the hype associated with these techniques is warranted, then our field has a clear imperative to debate the ethics and best practices surrounding use of these techniques. We believe that Guzzo et al. have done our field a service by starting this discussion.


2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Loue

It is critical that cognitively impaired adults be permitted to participate in research in order to develop a greater understanding of the underlying causes of the impairments and strategies to prevent or ameliorate their impact. Significant ethical and legal issues may arise in the recruitment and enrollment of these persons as study participants, due to difficulties in understanding information, uncertainty regarding the existence of sufficient mental capacity to provide informed consent to participate, and the potential for coercion to participate as a function of limited capacity and dependence on others for care. This article explores these issues and suggests mechanisms to maximize the understanding of information and facilitate the cognitively impaired elders’ expression of choice during incapacity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 43-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky Munoz ◽  
Mark Fox ◽  
Michael Gomez ◽  
Scott Gelfand

Author(s):  
David M. Corey ◽  
Mark Zelig

This chapter describes the procedures commonly followed in suitability and fitness evaluations, with a particular focus on the collection of data from three sources routinely required for these assessments. The authors discuss best practices for providing examinees with the necessary elements of disclosure about the evaluation, including its probable uses and potential negative outcomes, and for obtaining the examinee’s informed consent. The chapter includes detailed guidance for selecting assessment instruments, brief descriptions of the psychological tests most commonly used in suitability and fitness evaluations, and discussion of the emerging use of executive function measures in suitability evaluations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Edlund ◽  
Jessica L. Hartnett ◽  
Jeremy D. Heider ◽  
Emmanuel J. Perez ◽  
Jessica Lusk

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 546-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Goldfarb ◽  
John A Fromson ◽  
Tristan Gorrindo ◽  
Robert J Birnbaum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document