Do angiosperm tree species adjust intervessel lateral contact in response to soil drought?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radek Jupa ◽  
Dita Krabičková ◽  
Roman Plichta ◽  
Stefan Mayr ◽  
Vít Gloser

2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Zapater ◽  
Nathalie Bréda ◽  
Damien Bonal ◽  
Sylvia Pardonnet ◽  
André Granier


2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 3648-3656 ◽  
Author(s):  
吴芹 WU Qin ◽  
张光灿 ZHANG Guangcan ◽  
裴斌 PEI Bin ◽  
方立东 FANG Lidong


Trees ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Hölscher ◽  
Oliver Koch ◽  
Sandra Korn ◽  
Ch. Leuschner


2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Köcher ◽  
Tobias Gebauer ◽  
Viviana Horna ◽  
Christoph Leuschner


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2179-2194 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schuldt ◽  
C. Leuschner ◽  
V. Horna ◽  
G. Moser ◽  
M. Köhler ◽  
...  

Abstract. A large-scale replicated throughfall exclusion experiment was conducted in a pre-montane perhumid rainforest in Sulawesi (Indonesia) exposing the trees for two years to pronounced soil desiccation. The lack of regularly occurring dry periods and shallow rooting patterns distinguish this experiment from similar experiments conducted in the Amazonian rainforest. We tested the hypotheses that a tree's sun canopy is more affected by soil drought than its shade crown, making tall trees particularly vulnerable even under a perhumid climate, and that extended drought periods stimulate an acclimation in the hydraulic system of the sun canopy. In the abundant and tall tree species Castanopsis acuminatissima (Fagaceae), we compared 31 morphological, anatomical, hydraulic and chemical variables of leaves, branches and the stem together with stem diameter growth between drought and control plots. There was no evidence of canopy dieback. However, the drought treatment led to a 30 % reduction in sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity of sun canopy branches, possibly caused by the formation of smaller vessels and/or vessel filling by tyloses. Drought caused an increase in leaf size, but a decrease in leaf number, and a reduction in foliar calcium content. The δ13C and δ18O signatures of sun canopy leaves gave no indication of a permanent down-regulation of stomatal conductance during the drought, indicating that pre-senescent leaf shedding may have improved the water status of the remaining leaves. Annual stem diameter growth decreased during the drought, while the density of wood in the recently produced xylem increased in both the stem and sun canopy branches (marginally significant). The sun canopy showed a more pronounced drought response than the shade crown indicating that tall trees with a large sun canopy are more vulnerable to drought stress. We conclude that the extended drought prompted a number of medium- to long-term responses in the leaves, branches and the trunk, which may have reduced drought susceptibility. However, unlike a natural drought, our drought simulation experiment was carried out under conditions of high humidity, which may have dampened drought induced damages.



1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Toll ◽  
Federico J. Castillo ◽  
Pierre Crespi ◽  
Michele Crevecoeur ◽  
Hubert Greppin


EDIS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Paez ◽  
Jason A. Smith

Biscogniauxia canker or dieback (formerly called Hypoxylon canker or dieback) is a common contributor to poor health and decay in a wide range of tree species (Balbalian & Henn 2014). This disease is caused by several species of fungi in the genus Biscogniauxia (formerly Hypoxylon). B. atropunctata or B. mediterranea are usually the species found on Quercus spp. and other hosts in Florida, affecting trees growing in many different habitats, such as forests, parks, green spaces and urban areas (McBride & Appel, 2009).  Typically, species of Biscogniauxia are opportunistic pathogens that do not affect healthy and vigorous trees; some species are more virulent than others. However, once they infect trees under stress (water stress, root disease, soil compaction, construction damage etc.) they can quickly colonize the host. Once a tree is infected and fruiting structures of the fungus are evident, the tree is not likely to survive especially if the infection is in the tree's trunk (Anderson et al., 1995).



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document