Late-life homicide-suicide: a national case series in New Zealand

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Cheung ◽  
Susan Hatters Friedman ◽  
Frederick Sundram
Keyword(s):  
IDCases ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e01233
Author(s):  
Shivani Fox-Lewis ◽  
Andrew Fox-Lewis ◽  
Jay Harrower ◽  
Richard Chen ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
James Johnston ◽  
Timothy Hardcastle ◽  
Sita Tarini Clark ◽  
Murali Mahadevan ◽  
Richard G. Douglas

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211987106
Author(s):  
Judy Wang ◽  
Jasamine Coles-Black ◽  
Matija Radojcic ◽  
Jason Chuen ◽  
Philip Smart

Objectives: High-quality research is fundamental to the advancement of surgical practice. Currently, there is no quantitative assessment of the research output of vascular surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. By conducting this bibliometric analysis, we aim to provide an objective representation of the trends in vascular surgery and guide future research. Methods: A list of all current vascular surgeons in Australia and New Zealand was compiled from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons ‘Find a Surgeon’ website tool and correlated with the Australia and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery database. A Scopus search of each surgeon’s author profile over the last 20 years was conducted. Results: In total, 2120 articles were published by 208 Australasian vascular surgeons between 1998 and July 2018, with an overall increase in publications over time. Audits or case series were the most published type of study and only 8% of the publications were of high-level evidence. The most popular topics were thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies (24%), followed by peripheral arterial disease (15%). Chronological analysis illustrates an increasing volume of peripheral arterial disease research over time and there is a clear trend towards more endovascular and hybrid surgery publications. The top 10 (5%) highest publishing authors by h-index account for 41% of all publications and 49% of all citations and are also responsible for producing significantly more high-level evidence research. Conclusion: Australasian vascular surgeons have made a significant contribution to medical research. However, the majority of these articles are of low-level evidence. In this time, there has been an increasing number of publications on endovascular and hybrid surgery in keeping with the trend in clinical practice. These areas, as well as research regarding peripheral arterial disease, show potential for high-evidence research in the future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Joanna Wang ◽  
Elsie Ho ◽  
Patrick Au ◽  
Gary Cheung

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Winder ◽  
Stephen J. Monteith ◽  
Nicholas Lightfoot ◽  
Edward Mee

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jain ◽  
R P Morton ◽  
Z Ahmad

AbstractObjectives:To evaluate common pitfalls in diagnosing complicated plunging ranula, either due to misidentification of plunging ranula or alternative pathology (i.e. false negatives or false positives, respectively).Methods:A review of cases of plunging ranula seen in Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand, was performed. Diagnostically uncertain cases were identified and reviewed, taking particular note of clinical, radiological and surgical findings.Results:From our database, 12 cases were found to have had a complicated diagnosis of plunging ranula. Ten cases were false negatives: four were treated as abscesses, four as simple cysts, one as a thyroglossal cyst and one as a cystic hygroma. Two cases were false positives: one was found to be a thyroglossal cyst and the other a lipoma.Conclusion:The diagnosis of plunging ranula is usually straightforward, with simple surgical management. Misdiagnosis can lead to recurrence of symptoms and inappropriate management, with the associated risks, complications and frustrations of surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Mathur ◽  
MahendraPrakash Sharma ◽  
Srikala Bharath

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Savage

The database of the New Zealand Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM) is an example of the practice-based evidence discussed in the June issue of the Journal of Primary Health Care. Databases of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were established to generate hypotheses to be tested about previously unrecognised adverse reactions and interactions. Occasionally they are sufficient evidence in themselves. They can also identify prescribing practices that might increase the potential for ADRs to occur and provide feedback into guidelines in terms of the consequences of their use or non-use. Well-documented ADR reports can also highlight risk factors, thus providing a valuable contribution to risk benefit assessments in individual patients. Examples are discussed that support the use of ADRs as practice-based evidence in a non-hierarchical system in which case reports and case series, observational studies and randomised clinical trials contribute in a flexible relationship depending on the issue under investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document