scholarly journals P8‐3: Gene amplification of ACTN4 is a predictive biomarker for the adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil‐tegafur in stage‐I patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 287-288
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Noro ◽  
Kazufumi Honda ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Noriko Motoi ◽  
Shinobu Kunugi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7197-7197 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tsuboi ◽  
H. Kato ◽  
Y. Ichinose ◽  
M. Ohta ◽  
E. Hata ◽  
...  

7197 Background: To test the hypothesis that patients with completely resected p-stage I adenocarcinoma [Ad.] of the lung contain a favorable subgroup of patients with well differentiated histology and tumor 2.0 cm or less in greatest dimension, we analyzed the results of the JLCRG trial (a randomized prospective trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with Uracil-Tegaful for stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung) by tumor size, smoking history, degree of histological differentiation and more. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either oral uracil-tegaful (250 mg of tegaful /m2/day) for 2 years postoperatively or no adjuvant treatment. Multivariate analyses and interactions with the Cox proportional-hazards model were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of prognostic factors on survival. Results: The 5-year survival rate of the 412 patients with tumor 2cm or less in size was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8 to 92.8) versus 84.4% (95% CI: 81.3–87.4) for the 569 patients with tumor more than 2cm in size (median follow-up 72 months, p = 0.002). Although univariate analysis demonstrated improved survival for the patients with no smoking history and female gender, the selected covariates by multivariate analysis were as follows: age (hazard ratio [HR] for patients aged 70 years or more, 2.25; 95% CI: 1.58 to 3.14, p < 0.0001), tumor size (HR for more than 2cm in size, 1.55; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.21, p = 0.012), histological differentiation (HR for moderate and poor differentiation, 1.75, 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.47, p = 0.001), and treatment group (HR for the uracil-tegaful group, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94, p = 0.02). For these prognostic factors, there was only one significant interaction between tumor size and the adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: 1) Patients with completely resected stage I Ad. of the lung contain a favorable subgroup of patients with aged less than 70 years, well differentiated histology, and a maximum tumor dimension of 2.0 cm or less. 2) Adjuvant chemotherapy with oral uracil-tegaful should also be considered for stage I Ad. patients more than 2 cm in tumor size. 3) 2cm in tumor size might be a good benchmark candidate of the description of T factor to facilitate treatment strategies and revisions of the TNM staging system. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix387
Author(s):  
K. Honda ◽  
R. Noro ◽  
N. Miura ◽  
K. Tsuta ◽  
G. Ishii ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S124
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Nasioudis ◽  
Spyridon Mastroyannis ◽  
Emily Ko ◽  
Ashley Haggerty ◽  
Lori Cory ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document