Suppressing methane emission and global warming potential from rice fields through intermittent drainage and green biomass amendment

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. M. Haque ◽  
J. C. Biswas ◽  
S. Y. Kim ◽  
P. J. Kim

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Mozammel Haque ◽  
Jatish Chandra Biswas ◽  
Sang Yoon Kim ◽  
Pil Joo Kim




2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (17) ◽  
pp. 2737-2746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liming Zhang ◽  
Dongsheng Yu ◽  
Xuezheng Shi ◽  
David C. Weindorf ◽  
Limin Zhao ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Colombini ◽  
Maddalena Zucali ◽  
Luca Rapetti ◽  
G. Matteo Crovetto ◽  
Anna Sandrucci ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 6581-6591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guochun Xu ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Qiangsheng Wang ◽  
Ruiheng Xiong ◽  
Yuhao Hang




Atmosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiwamu Ishikura ◽  
Untung Darung ◽  
Takashi Inoue ◽  
Ryusuke Hatano

This study investigated spatial factors controlling CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes and compared global warming potential (GWP) among undrained forest (UDF), drained forest (DF), and drained burned land (DBL) on tropical peatland in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sampling was performed once within two weeks in the beginning of dry season. CO2 flux was significantly promoted by lowering soil moisture and pH. The result suggests that oxidative peat decomposition was enhanced in drier position, and the decomposition acidify the peat soils. CH4 flux was significantly promoted by a rise in groundwater level, suggesting that methanogenesis was enhanced under anaerobic condition. N2O flux was promoted by increasing soil nitrate content in DF, suggesting that denitrification was promoted by substrate availability. On the other hand, N2O flux was promoted by lower soil C:N ratio and higher soil pH in DBL and UDF. CO2 flux was the highest in DF (241 mg C m−2 h−1) and was the lowest in DBL (94 mg C m−2 h−1), whereas CH4 flux was the highest in DBL (0.91 mg C m−2 h−1) and was the lowest in DF (0.01 mg C m−2 h−1), respectively. N2O flux was not significantly different among land uses. CO2 flux relatively contributed to 91–100% of GWP. In conclusion, it is necessary to decrease CO2 flux to mitigate GWP through a rise in groundwater level and soil moisture in the region.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document