scholarly journals Assessing Potential Risks of Influenza A Virus Transmission at the Pig-Human Interface in Thai Small Pig Farms Using a Questionnaire Survey

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. e135-e139
Author(s):  
P. Netrabukkana ◽  
I. D. Robertson ◽  
S. Kasemsuwan ◽  
K. Wongsathapornchai ◽  
S. Fenwick
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S24-S24
Author(s):  
Mai-Juan Ma ◽  
Guo-Lin Wang ◽  
Benjamin Anderson ◽  
Zhen-Qiang Bi ◽  
Bing Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our understanding of the risk factors for swine influenza A virus transmission between humans and pigs is sparse. Methods Beginning in 2015, we used a One Health approach and serial sampling to prospectively study 299 swine workers and 100 controls, their 9000 pigs, and six pig farm environments in China for influenza A viruses (IAVs) using molecular, culture, and immunological techniques. Study subjects were closely monitored for influenza-like illness (ILI) events. Results Upon enrollment, swine workers had higher serum neutralizing antibody titers against swine H1N1 and higher nasal wash total IgA and specific IgA titers against swine H1N1 and H3N2 viruses. Over a period of 12 months, IAVs were detected by qRT-PCR in 52 (12%) of 432 environmental swabs, 275 (7.6%) of 3600 pig oral secretion, 25 (5.8%) of 432 water, 24 (5.5%) of 432 aerosol, and 20 (4.6%) of 432 fecal-slurry specimens. Five (15.6%) of 32 subjects with ILI events had nasopharyngeal swab specimens that were positive for IAV and 17 (53%) demonstrated 4-fold rises in neutralization titers against a swine virus. Reassorted Eurasian avian-like swine H1N1, pdm09(H1N1)-like virus, and swine-like H3N2 viruses were identified in pig farms. The H1N1 viruses were nearly genetically identical with the human H1N1 viruses isolated from the subjects with ILI. Conclusion There was considerable evidence of A(H1N1)pdm09-like, swine H1N1 and swine H3N2 viruses reassorting and circulating within the pig farms and crossing species. These data suggest that stronger surveillance for novel influenza virus emergence within swine farms is imperative. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Cardona ◽  
Ben Wileman ◽  
Sasidhar Malladi ◽  
Rachael Ceballos ◽  
Marie Culhane ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Ninomiya ◽  
Ayato Takada ◽  
Katsunori Okazaki ◽  
Kennedy F Shortridge ◽  
Hiroshi Kida

2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai-Juan Ma ◽  
Guo-Lin Wang ◽  
Benjamin D Anderson ◽  
Zhen-Qiang Bi ◽  
Bing Lu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane Ribeiro Amorim ◽  
Luz Alba Maria Garcete Fornells ◽  
Felicidade da Costa Reis ◽  
Daiana Jacinto Rezende ◽  
Gabriella da Silva Mendes ◽  
...  

mSphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Rambo-Martin ◽  
Matthew W. Keller ◽  
Malania M. Wilson ◽  
Jacqueline M. Nolting ◽  
Tavis K. Anderson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT While working overnight at a swine exhibition, we identified an influenza A virus (IAV) outbreak in swine, Nanopore sequenced 13 IAV genomes from samples we collected, and predicted in real time that these viruses posed a novel risk to humans due to genetic mismatches between the viruses and current prepandemic candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs). We developed and used a portable IAV sequencing and analysis platform called Mia (Mobile Influenza Analysis) to complete and characterize full-length consensus genomes approximately 18 h after unpacking the mobile lab. Exhibition swine are a known source for zoonotic transmission of IAV to humans and pose a potential pandemic risk. Genomic analyses of IAV in swine are critical to understanding this risk, the types of viruses circulating in swine, and whether current vaccines developed for use in humans would be predicted to provide immune protection. Nanopore sequencing technology has enabled genome sequencing in the field at the source of viral outbreaks or at the bedside or pen-side of infected humans and animals. The acquired data, however, have not yet demonstrated real-time, actionable public health responses. The Mia system rapidly identified three genetically distinct swine IAV lineages from three subtypes, A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and A(H1N2). Analysis of the hemagglutinin (HA) sequences of the A(H1N2) viruses identified >30 amino acid differences between the HA1 of these viruses and the most closely related CVV. As an exercise in pandemic preparedness, all sequences were emailed to CDC collaborators who initiated the development of a synthetically derived CVV. IMPORTANCE Swine are influenza virus reservoirs that have caused outbreaks and pandemics. Genomic characterization of these viruses enables pandemic risk assessment and vaccine comparisons, though this typically occurs after a novel swine virus jumps into humans. The greatest risk occurs where large groups of swine and humans comingle. At a large swine exhibition, we used Nanopore sequencing and on-site analytics to interpret 13 swine influenza virus genomes and identified an influenza virus cluster that was genetically highly varied to currently available vaccines. As part of the National Strategy for Pandemic Preparedness exercises, the sequences were emailed to colleagues at the CDC who initiated the development of a synthetically derived vaccine designed to match the viruses at the exhibition. Subsequently, this virus caused 14 infections in humans and was the dominant U.S. variant virus in 2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document