RHCE diversity among Brazilian patients with sickle cell disease ( SCD ) and selected groups of blood donors

Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine Prisco Arnoni ◽  
Tatiane Vendrame ◽  
Janaína Muniz ◽  
Afonso Cortez ◽  
Flavia Latini ◽  
...  
Transfusion ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1388-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Price ◽  
Jessica H. Boyd ◽  
Andre R. Watkins ◽  
Fay Fleming ◽  
Michael R. DeBaun

2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1652-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetoslav Nanev Slavov ◽  
Simone Kashima Haddad ◽  
Ana Cristina Silva-Pinto ◽  
Alberto Anastacio Amarilla ◽  
Helda Liz Alfonso ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Author(s):  
Richard O Francis ◽  
Danamarie Belpulsi ◽  
Mark Soffing ◽  
Randy Yeh ◽  
Esther E Coronel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pre-transfusion refrigerated storage of red cells (RBCs) induces a series of metabolic and structural changes in stored RBCs (i.e., the "storage lesion"). The resulting, progressive, time-dependent decrease in RBC quality leads to decreased post-transfusion RBC recovery (PTR). Markers of oxidative stress increase during storage, suggesting the possibility that oxidative stress may be a key contributor to the storage lesion. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, an X-linked condition, decreases the ability of RBCs to withstand oxidative stress by compromising their ability to synthesize NADPH. Therefore, we hypothesized that RBCs from G6PD-deficient donors would have inferior storage quality, as compared to RBCs from G6PD-normal (i.e., control) donors. Aims: This study examined whether G6PD deficiency, the most common enzyme deficiency worldwide, which impairs the RBC response to oxidative stress, also decreases RBC storage quality. Methods: Male volunteers were screened for G6PD deficiency by enzymatic assay, and next generation sequencing was performed to identify the G6PD variant in deficient subjects. In addition, participants were screened for the presence of hemoglobin variants and thalassemia by high performance liquid chromatography and complete blood count. Twenty seven control and 10 G6PD-deficient volunteers each received informed consent, donated 1 unit of leukoreduced RBCs that was stored in AS-3 under standard blood banking conditions, and completed an autologous 51-Chromium-labeled PTR study after 40-42 days of storage. Hemolysis rate in the transfused unit was measured on the day of the PTR study using a Drabkin assay. Results for control and G6PD-deficient PTRs and hemolysis rates were compared using unpaired t-tests. Results: A total of 145 males were screened for G6PD deficiency, yielding 15 deficient (10%) and 130 G6PD normal control (90%) subjects. Twenty seven control (G6PD normal) and 10 deficient participants who did not have hemoglobin variants or microcytosis completed the study. All blood donors met the hemoglobin acceptance criteria for autologous whole blood donation of at least 11.5 g/dL. G6PD gene sequencing of the 10 enrolled G6PD-deficient subjects identified the A- variant in 9 volunteers and the Mediterranean variant in 1. The autologous mean 24-hour PTR for control RBC units was 86.8 ± 2.8% (mean ± SD). The autologous mean 24-hour PTR for G6PD-deficient RBC units was 81.0 ± 7.2% (mean ± SD), which was significantly lower than that for control RBCs (p=0.001). None of the control volunteers (0/27) had PTR results below 75%, one of the key FDA acceptability criteria for stored RBCs. In contrast, two G6PD-deficient volunteers (2/10) had PTR results below 75% (i.e., 68.8% and 70.1%). There was no association between enzymatic G6PD activity and PTR when adjusted for G6PD status (i.e., among control or G6PD-deficient subjects, the enzymatic G6PD activity did not predict PTR). Finally, there was no difference between control and deficient RBC units in mean in vitro hemolysis rates at the end of storage (0.29 ± 0.18% vs. 0.24 ± 0.07%, respectively; p=0.38) Conclusions: This is the first report of the effect of G6PD deficiency on the storage quality at outdate of transfused donor RBCs stored in AS-3 additive solution as assessed by PTR, the FDA gold standard. These results demonstrate that the storage quality of G6PD-deficient RBCs is inferior to G6PD-normal RBCs. In particular, based on the FDA criteria that acceptable RBC units should have a 24-hour PTR of ≥75% at the end of storage, RBC units from G6PD-deficient donors had a 20% failure rate. The clinical consequences of the mean 5.8% decreased PTR of G6PD-defcient RBC units remain to be determined. Patients with sickle cell disease often require lifetime transfusions and up to 12.3% of phenotypically-matched RBC units utilized in their care may be G6PD-deficient. Thus, these data raise the question of whether there is value in screening blood donors for G6PD deficiency, particularly in the setting of chronic transfusion therapy, such as for patients with sickle cell disease and thalassemia. Disclosures Spitalnik: New Health Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3446-3454 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.M.S. Viana-Baracioli ◽  
N.C. Tukamoto Junior ◽  
O. Ricci Júnior ◽  
L.C. Mattos ◽  
I.L. Ângulo ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2893-2893
Author(s):  
Stella T. Chou ◽  
David F. Friedman ◽  
Tannoa Jackson ◽  
Sunitha Vege ◽  
Margaret A. Keller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background RH gene variation is frequent in individuals of African descent and contributes to Rh alloimmunization among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite antigen matching for C, E, and K and transfusion from African American (AA) donors, patients with SCD continue to form antibodies against Rh antigens (Chou et al 2013, Blood, 122, 1062). RH genotyping of patients with SCD and selected African American (AA) donor groups has the potential to improve transfusion therapy. We developed a virtual matching program with groups of AA blood donors and patients with SCD to select blood based on RH genotype and tested whether a RH genotype matching strategy is feasible. Moreover, we evaluated the feasibility of considering patient and AA donor RH genotypes for individuals with SCD immunized to D and e antigens since providing D- and/or e- RBCs often exposes the patient to other antigens they may lack and results in further alloimmunization events. Methods RH genotypes were determined in 657 patients with SCD and 625 AA blood donors by RH BeadChip (BioArray Solutions) and manual AS-PCR or exon sequence analysis for alleles ambiguous or not detected by Beadchip. Automated virtual donor matching for each patient with SCD was performed considering RHD and RHCE separately and together. Customized scripts in a Filemaker Pro database counted exact genetic matches as well as used more ÒinclusiveÓ criteria to select donors with only RH genes that would not encode Rh antigens absent in the patient. Results The distributions of RHD and RHCE alleles in donors and patients were similar. Of 24 RHD genes detected in both groups, 5 (RHD*D, *DAU0, *deleted D, *weak D 4.0, and *inactive RHDψ) accounted for 91% of donor alleles and 90% of patient alleles. Of 23 RHCE genes, the 7 most common accounted for 92% of donor alleles, and 91% of patient alleles. Match results for patients with > 25 donor matches or no matches according to locus and stringency of criteria are summarized in the table. Percent of 657 pts with > 25 or no matches by locus and stringency of criteria TableMatch by:RHDRHCERHD and RHCECriteria>25None>25None>25NoneExact68.2%4.4%41.7%5.0%9.9%19.0%Inclusive*100%0%76.7%0.91%61.8%1.4% *Inclusive match includes donors with only RH genes that would not encode Rh antigens absent in the patient. Thirty D+ individuals had formed anti-D and were subsequently transfused D- RBCs, accounting for 70% of units transfused to these individuals (9305 D- units of 13304 total units transfused). Twenty-three individuals had at least one conventional RHD allele (77%). Virtual matching revealed an average of 8 donors (1.3%, range 0 - 44) with exact genetic matches and 43 donors (6.9%, range 0 - 44) using ÒinclusiveÓ criteria, compared to 128 donors (20.5%, range 113 - 210) available if matching by serology for D, C, and E. Twenty-one e+ individuals (7 E+e+ and 14 E-e+) had anti-e, and were transfused e-E+ RBCs if anti-e was demonstrating in their serum. Four of the 14 E-e+ subsequently formed anti-E. Virtual matching revealed an average of 7 donors (1.1%, range 0 - 22) with exact genetic matches and 34 donors (5.4%, range 5 - 107) using ÒinclusiveÓ criteria, compared to 133 donors (21.3%, range 113 - 166) available if matching by serology for D, C, and E. Conclusions Automated selection of AA donors based on RHD, RHCE, or both would be feasible for the majority of patients with SCD given an adequate genotyped donor pool. These studies are necessary to determine the number of minority donors required to support patients with SCD with genetically Rh matched donor units. Compared to donor matching by serologic Rh types, genetic matching for this patient cohort may prevent exposure to a foreign RhD or RhCE protein, but does limit the number of donors versus standard phenotype matching for C and E. For patients immunized to Rh antigens, providing RH genotype matched units may decrease the need for D- donor units and avoid further alloimmunization. Future prospective studies are needed to determine whether transfusion with RH genotype matched donor units can decrease alloimmunization and improve transfusion safety for patients with SCD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3842-3842
Author(s):  
Jay N Lozier ◽  
Eugene Park ◽  
Chutima Kumkhaek ◽  
Mary E Link ◽  
Wynona Coles ◽  
...  

Abstract We have reported a case of acquired hemophilia A in our series of sickle cell disease patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using HLA matched sibling donors, non-myeloablative conditioning, and sirolimus immunosuppression for GVHD prevention (Lozier et al, Haemophilia 2013). Subsequently we encountered another case in the 48 patients now transplanted. The objective of our transplant regimen is to establish a stable engraftment that will correct the sickle cell disease, with minimal morbidity. As a result of the non-myeloablative conditioning, our HSCT recipients typically display mixed chimerism between donor and recipient after HSCT with a post-HSCT immune system derived from both donor and recipient. We investigated the prevalence of FVIII-binding antibodies by ELISA in HSCT recipients prior to and after HSCT, and sought to determine if prior exposure to blood products, differences in FVIII haplotypes, and/or ethnicity may predispose to FVIII inhibitors. We measured IgG antibodies that bind FVIII by ELISA in 30 of our 48 transplanted subjects and donors for whom plasma, serum, and DNA were available, before and after HSCT. Published evidence suggests 3-19% of normal blood donors have detectable FVIII binding antibodies when tested in an ELISA format (Krudysz-Amblo et al, Blood 2009; Whelan et al, Blood 2012). We were surprised to find that 22 of 30 recipients (73%) had measurable titers of ≥ 1:50 prior to HSCT. We also assessed their sibling donors as a control group and found 13 of 24 evaluable donors had titers ≥ 1:50 (54%). Measurement of antibodies to FVIII in African-American blood donors at NIH showed 8 of 13 (62%) to have ≥ 1:50 titers, in contrast to only 1 of 20 Caucasian (5%) NIH blood donors tested (P < 0.05). This suggests African-Americans are more likely to form antibodies to FVIII than Caucasians, and might explain the two cases of acquired hemophilia A in our HSCT study. This has not been reported in allogeneic HSCT studies, though 2 out of 155 autologous HSCT patients with autoimmune diseases were reported to have acquired hemophilia after HSCT (Loh et al, Blood 2007). Of 8 patients with titers <1:50, 6 had no increase in titers measured out to two years after HSCT; 2 had peak post-transplant titers of 1:50 or 1:100 at most, and none developed FVIII inhibitors. Of 22 patients with titers of ≥ 1:50 pre-transplant two developed FVIII inhibitors and 20 had unchanged or diminishing titers following HSCT (P = 0.38, for inhibitor development, NS). We investigated the possibility that transfusions with red blood cells for sickle cell disease might have sensitized patients, either by exposure to "foreign" FVIII protein or by modulation of the immune system, prior to HSCT. Of the 8 patients with titers < 1:50 pre-transplant, one recalled transfusion with > 50 units of RBCs prior to transplant (12.5%), while 9 of 22 with titers ≥ 1:50 prior to transplant (41%) recalled transfusion with > 50 units of RBCs prior to transplant (P = 0.14, NS). Six haplotypes of the FVIII protein are known, and empiric data suggests uncommon haplotypes more prevalent in African-Americans may be associated with higher rates of FVIII inhibitors in African-Americans with hemophilia A after FVIII treatment (Viel et al, NEJM 2009), and rare FVIII polymorphisms are associated with acquired hemophilia A in the Caucasian population as well (Tiede et al, Ann Hematol 2010). We ascertained FVIII haplotypes in HSCT recipients and their donors to see if mismatches between donor and recipient may be associated with FVIII antibodies or inhibitors. Of 30 patients studied, there were 27 for whom DNA data permitted us to infer haplotypes. Fourteen recipients were identical matches to their donors, of whom one (7%) had an increase in titer from baseline after transplant; none developed an inhibitor. Of 15 recipients with mismatches in FVIII haplotypes with their donors, 3 had increases from baseline titers after transplant (20%), including the two FVIII inhibitor patients (P = 0.45, NS). Our study shows that African-Americans have a higher prevalence of low-titer/subclinical anti-human FVIII antibodies compared to Caucasians which may explain subsequent FVIII inhibitors in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell HSCT. Neither greater recalled exposure to RBC transfusions pre-HSCT nor mismatch of FVIII haplotypes with donor explain the risk of inhibitor development. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document