Clinical comparison of tear film breakup time measurements in normal dogs using three different methods of fluorescein solution administration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Palmer ◽  
Renata V. Ramos ◽  
Roxanne M. Rodriguez Galarza
Author(s):  
Lindsay D. Seyer ◽  
Robert W. Wills ◽  
Caroline M. Betbeze

Abstract OBJECTIVE To determine intra- and interobserver reliability of a fluorescein stain–based tear film breakup time (TFBUT) test as performed in a clinical environment with and without administration of a topical anesthetic. ANIMALS 21 privately owned dogs. PROCEDURES A randomized study design was used. Two independent observers that commonly perform the TFBUT test in clinical practice read the same description of TFBUT. Observers performed TFBUT testing for each dog before and after topical administration of 0.5% proparacaine solution in 4 testing periods with a 1-hour interval between periods. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to assess inter- and intraobserver test reliability. Linear mixed models were used to assess the main effects of testing period, observer, eye, and presence of ophthalmic disorders and their interactions on TFBUT. RESULTS Mean TFBUT measurements performed by observer 1 and observer 2 were 5.9 seconds and 8.6 seconds, respectively, when adjusted for other effects in the model. Intraobserver ICC was poor for one observer and moderate for the other. Interobserver ICC was poor without use of topical anesthetic and slightly lower when anesthetic was used. Observer and testing period were each significantly associated with TFBUT; the measurements decreased and were more variable after multiple applications of fluorescein stain and proparacaine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested tear film stability is negatively affected by topical administration of 0.5% proparacaine solution and repeated applications of fluorescein stain. The TFBUT test as performed in this study had poor to moderate reliability.


1979 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 1944-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. Gautheron ◽  
V. J. Lotti ◽  
J. C. Le Douarec
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takenori Inomata ◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
Yoshimune Hiratsuka ◽  
Keiichi Fujimoto ◽  
Yuichi Okumura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Xiao ◽  
Muhammed Yasin Adil ◽  
Jonatan Olafsson ◽  
Xiangjun Chen ◽  
Øygunn A. Utheim ◽  
...  

AbstractMeibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of dry eye and proposed treatments are based on disease severity. Our purpose was to establish reliable morphologic measurements of meibomian glands for evaluating MGD severity. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 100 MGD patients and 20 controls. The patients were classified into dry eye severity level (DESL) 1–4 based on symptoms and clinical parameters including tear-film breakup time, ocular staining and Schirmer I. The gland loss, length, thickness, density and distortion were analyzed. We compared the morphology between patients and controls; examined their correlations to meibum expressibility, quality, and DESL. Relative to controls, the gland thickness, density and distortion were elevated in patients (p < 0.001 for all tests). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96–1.0) for gland loss, and 0.96 (CI 0.91–1.0) for gland distortion, with a cutoff value of six distorted glands yielding a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97% for MGD diagnosis. The gland distortion was negatively correlated to the meibum expressibility (r = −0.53; p < 0.001) and DESL (r = −0.22, p = 0.018). In conclusion, evaluation of meibomian gland loss and distortion are valuable complementary clinical parameters to assess MGD status.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0215130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eisuke Shimizu ◽  
Yoko Ogawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Yazu ◽  
Naohiko Aketa ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 736-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rana Altan-Yaycioglu ◽  
Selcuk Sizmaz ◽  
Handan Canan ◽  
Muge Coban-Karatas

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Willmann ◽  
Andreas Schatz ◽  
M. Dominik Fischer ◽  
Kai Schommer ◽  
Eberhart Zrenner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 3463
Author(s):  
Samrat Chatterjee ◽  
Deepshikha Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Dry Eye ◽  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 789
Author(s):  
Jun Shimazaki ◽  
Miki Sakata ◽  
Seika Den ◽  
Miki Iwasaki ◽  
Ikuko Toda

We studied the efficacy and safety of a handheld osmolarity measurement system (I-PEN) in Japanese patients with dry eye disease (DED) and non-DED subjects. In this prospective, multicenter study, tear osmolarity was examined using the I-PEN in a total of 122 eyes divided into DED (n = 71) and non-DED (n = 51) groups. Subjective symptoms were assessed using the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaire. Ocular surface condition was evaluated in terms of fluorescein tear breakup time (FBUT) and tear breakup pattern (TBUP), and by fluorescein staining and Schirmer’s test. The I-PEN measurements were performed safely in the majority of cases. There was no statistically significant difference in mean tear film osmolarity between the DED and non-DED groups (294.76 ± 16.39 vs. 297.76 ± 16.72 mOsms/L, respectively, p = 0.32). No significant correlations were observed between osmolarity values and DEQS score, FBUT, or the Schirmer score. Osmolarity did not differ among TBUP subgroups. This prospective clinical study found no correlations between the tear film osmolarity values obtained with the I-PEN system and any subjective or objective parameters of DED. Further studies are required to determine the utility of the I-PEN system in other settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document