Ontology of Mutation Testing for Java Operators

Author(s):  
Sherolwendy Sualim ◽  
Radziah Mohamad ◽  
Nor Azizah Saadon

Operators are special characters within the Java language to manipulate primitive data type. Java operators can be classified as unary, binary and ternary. The design of Java operator sometimes becomes confusing when it comes to testing tools as they had the same function with different label in every testing tool.  Therefore, in order to map the knowledge of operators correctly, this research has proposed ontology that is dedicated to mutation testing as a means to define the formal specification of concepts and documentation of knowledge of Java operators. Existing papers on ontology did not specify further on entities and properties of operators. Some papers only focus on mutation testing but not the operators. Thus, this paper will present the ontology clearly with the aim to ease end user to identify and understand every classes, properties and relations in Java operators.

Author(s):  
N. Induja ◽  
R. Maruthi

The environments where the build to focus the warehouse to maintain all the business aspects are satisfied and the quality are obtained on the functionalities are acting up to the users mark. The objective of this paper is to evaluate and initiate a mechanism to evaluate automation tools effectively, at the moment. There are various systems built and even if they are platform independent and also if existing with additional features they are having many demerits that don't satisfy the end user. An important contribution of this paper is the development of the metric suite that facilitates assessment and selection of a desired testing tool for automated testing and in relation to the environment for the software is developed. At the software industry it is a high value for project management team selecting the tools that may satisfy the requirement satisfactions highlighted by the end user to be satisfied to maintain the business mix.


Author(s):  
John R. Hoyes

With the benefit of hindsight some of the initial non-asbestos offerings were doomed to be commercial failures and since then evolution, in the true Darwinian “survival of the fittest” sense, has resulted in the demise of those offerings. In parallel with this process of evolution, the sealing material testing tools that are available have improved. Consequently, the relationship between a material’s contents, its structure, test data and its service potential is far better understood than in previous times. This improved understanding has brought, and will continue to bring, enhanced performance benefits to the end user and increased security against unplanned shut down due to service failures. This paper reviews the evolution process, highlights the classes of materials that have proven to be successful and tries to indicate why, in terms of the properties of the material, they have been successful. The salient features of the content and structure of these materials are also discussed. The paper also speculates about the way in which further consolidation of the range of sealing materials may come about as the process of evolution, driven by cost, performance and environment pressures, continues.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 2426-2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marinos Kintis ◽  
Mike Papadakis ◽  
Andreas Papadopoulos ◽  
Evangelos Valvis ◽  
Nicos Malevris ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Heidilyn Veloso Gamido ◽  
Marlon Viray Gamido

<span>Software testing is considered to be one of the most important processes in software development for it verifies if the system meets the user requirements and specification. Manual testing and automated testing are two ways of conducting software testing. Automated testing gives software testers the ease to automate the process of software testing thus considered more effective when time, cost and usability are concerned. There are a wide variety of automated testing tools available, either open source or commercial. This paper provides a comparative review of features of open source and commercial testing tools that may help users to select the appropriate software testing tool based on their requirements.</span>


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayank Singh ◽  
Shailendra Mishra ◽  
Rajib Mall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document