Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Selecting The Best Design Concept

Author(s):  
Hambali Ariff ◽  
Mohd. Sapuan Salit ◽  
Napsiah Ismail ◽  
Y. Nukman

Pemilihan konsep reka bentuk yang sesuai di peringkat reka bentuk gagasan dalam proses pembangunan produk adalah merupakan keputusan yang genting. Keputusan yang tidak tepat boleh menyebabkan sesuatu produk itu perlu direka bentuk semula atau dikilang semula. Salah satu daripada keadah yang boleh digunakan dalam menentukan konsep reka bentuk yang paling sesuai adalah process hierarki beranalitis (AHP). AHP telah digunakan dalam hampir kesemua aplikasi yang berkaitan dengan membuat sesuatu keputusan. Dalam kertas kerja ini, hasil daripada kajian kes menunjukkan bahawa konsep AHP boleh membantu pereka bentuk untuk membuat penilaian secara berkesan daripada pelbagai konsep reka bentuk di peringkat reka bentuk gagasan. Kertas kerja ini memaparkan kaedah pemilihan konsep reka bentuk dengan menggunakan proses hierarki beranalitis. Kata kunci: Process hierarki beranalitis; reka bentuk gagasan; proses pembangunan produk; perbandingan pasangan; pembangunan kerusi roda Selecting the right design concept at conceptual design stage in product development process is a crucial decision. Inaccurate decision can cause the product to be redesigned or remanufactured. One of the useful tools that can be employed in determining the most appropriate design concept is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). AHP has been employed in almost all applications related to decision–making problems. In this paper, the results of a case study illustrates that AHP concept can assist designers to effectively evaluate various conceptual design alternatives at the conceptual design stage. This paper presents the methodology of selecting design concepts using analytical hierarchy process. Key words: Analytical hierarchy process; conceptual design; product development process; pairwise comparison; wheelchair development

Author(s):  
Narucha Tanaiutchawoot ◽  
Nikola Bursac ◽  
Simon Rapp ◽  
Albert Albers

AbstractMany activities in the new product development requires the decision making to find the final solution from multiple alternatives and make an evaluation. Even methods to support decision maker are available, the decision can go to the wrong direction because of heuristics. “Decoy effect” is a heuristic that appears in a comparison when 2 of 3 alternatives are similar but different in quality. The alternative that is similar but better in quality is possibly selected. The paper aims to understand the decoy effect by investigating it in the pairwise comparison that is a powerful technique for comparing alternatives. In an experiment, 3 ideas for the next generation of apple peeler are compared in pairs with different sequences. An impact of the decoy alternative on the comparison between other two alternatives, is investigated. Results show low impact of the decoy effect in the pairwise comparison, but this effect induces a high chance of selecting the decoy alternative when comparing the results from this study and the previous study by proposing 3 alternatives in the same sequence. Applying pairwise comparison to avoid decoy effect is thus an idea that will be further investigated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 699 ◽  
pp. 897-902
Author(s):  
Sivarao ◽  
Mohd Fairuz Dimin ◽  
N.M.F. Faris ◽  
A. Hambali ◽  
Sivakumar Dhar Malingam ◽  
...  

Veracious concept selection process is crucial in design engineering where, a concept with concise description will fulfill customers’ requirements. Failure in concept selection can lead to inaccurate design which will result in unnecessary process repetition of the initial stage. One of the best tools that can be used in determining the best design concept is Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Micro Hot-Marking Tool (HMT) is a super-finished tool with micro tip which is to be used for alphabetical marking process using CNC milling machine. In this research, AHP was successfully employed in selecting design concept for HMT. Four significant and robust concepts were analyzed, namely C1, C2, C3 & C4. Concept 2 (C2) has been chosen as the best concept with the highest score of 27% among all the evaluated concepts which will be taken into next design stage.


Author(s):  
Ravindra M. Kurtadikar ◽  
Robert B. Stone

Customer satisfaction is key for survival and success in today’s consumer market. It is crucial that the customer be used to differentiate between different variants of a product, also known as a company’s product portfolio. Numerous examples in industry prove the benefit of a platform strategy in product development. The aim is to capture a wider market share by launching a number of products based on a common platform and to reduce design and development cost by reducing design cycle time. In this paper we explore the possibility of using high level customer needs alone to define the product’s base platform and differentiating modules. The basic idea is to outline platform and differentiating modules during conceptual design stage of product development and thus plan a product family before we consider any architecture. Planning platforms in conceptual design stage reduces additional costs associated with designing, manufacturing and managing resources for each variant separately. We use design tools such as the functional basis and functional modeling in our approach. In this work we seek to validate the technique by first applying it to existing products and comparing the results against known product platforms. In this paper we outline platform and differentiating modules for a bike and shop vacuum. Future work will focus on applying this approach for more products and finally to new products during conceptual design stage.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 488
Author(s):  
Daizhong Su ◽  
Jose L. Casamayor ◽  
Xuemin Xu

Lighting products are essential for our modern life nowadays, but they also produce high negative impacts on the environment. Although there are tools and methods available for reducing the environmental impact of lighting products, it is a challenging task to integrate them throughout the product development process. To overcome the challenge, this research developed an approach to integrate tools/methods relevant for the eco-design through product development process to reduce the environmental impact of lighting products. Six types of methods, such module design, and 30 tools, such as lifecycle assessment software packages, are considered in the integrated approach. The product specification with eco-constrains is established for implementation at each design stage to ensure the product eco-features. The approach was applied in the development of an LED table lamp which was then assessed in comparison with a benchmark LED lamp regarding environmental lifecycle impact and lighting performance. The comparative assessment results indicate that the LED lamp developed with this approach is much better than the benchmark lamp.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document