scholarly journals Organizational structures and processes in nurse-led, evidence-based practice projects that result in measurable outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Carroll ◽  
Peggy Murphy ◽  
Eileen Romano ◽  
Inga Uremovich
2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Rodgers ◽  
Janice S. Withycombe ◽  
Marilyn J. Hockenberry

2021 ◽  
Vol 186 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Heather C King ◽  
Laura A Talbot

ABSTRACT Military nurses have been placed in the forefront of clinical and leadership roles during the COVID-19 pandemic. Serving in critical roles, military nurses have spearheaded innovations in clinical practice, conducted research, and implemented evidence-based practice projects that have advanced the capabilities of the Armed Forces Nurse Corps. This collection captures and highlights many of these military nursing contributions combating the COVID-19 pandemic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Moch ◽  
Lisa Quinn-Lee ◽  
Cara Gallegos ◽  
Charlotte K. Sortedahl

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Erichsen Andersson ◽  
Wendy Gifford ◽  
Kerstin Nilsson

Background: More knowledge is needed on the preconditions and circumstances for leading implementation of evidence based practice in the operating room (OR). Effective leadership support is critical to enhance the provision of safer care. The aim of this study was to explore managers’ and clinical leaders’ experiences of implementing evidence-based practice to increase patient safety in the operating room.Methods: The study had a qualitative descriptive design. In all, 25 managers were interviewed, with different surgical specialities (orthopedics, general and pediatric surgery) and operating room suites, from eight hospitals and 15 departments.Results: The organizational structures were defined as key obstacles to implementation. Specifically, lack of a common platform for cooperation between managers from different departments, organizational levels and professional groups impeded the alignment of shared goals and directions. In cases where implementation was successful, well-functioning and supportive relationships between the managers from different professions and levels were crucial along with a strong sense of ownership and control over the implementation process. Whilst managers expressed the conviction that safety was an important issue that was supported by top management, the goal was usually to “get through” as many operations as possible. This created conflicts between either prioritizing implementation of safety measures or production goals, which sometimes led to decisions that were counter to evidence-based practice (EBP). While evidence was considered crucial in all implementation efforts, it might be neglected and mistrusted if hierarchical boundaries between professional subgroups were challenged, or if it concerned preventive innovations as opposed to technical innovations.Conclusions: The preconditions for implementing EBP in the OR are suboptimal; thus addressing leadership, organizational and interprofessional barriers are of vital importance.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Chlan ◽  
Mary F. Tracy ◽  
Irene Grossbach

This article presents suggestions for nurses to gain skill, competence, and comfort in caring for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support, with a specific focus on education strategies and building communication skills with these challenging nonverbal patients. Engaging in evidence-based practice projects at the unit level and participating in or leading research studies are key ways nurses can contribute to improving outcomes for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Suggestions are offered for evidence-based practice projects and possible research studies to improve outcomes and advance the science in an effort to achieve quality patient-ventilator management in intensive care units.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane McNally Forsyth ◽  
Tracy L. Wright ◽  
Cindy A. Scherb ◽  
Phyllis M. Gaspar

The international emphasis on evidence-based practice (EBP) as a basis for quality care has elevated the importance of EBP dissemination. The doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree has created opportunities for nurses to implement EBP projects in collaboration with academic and clinical teams. Findings from such innovative efforts ought to be widely distributed, yet such projects have unique dissemination needs that are not readily met by traditional research-based presentation venues. Current literature focuses on presentation approaches for research-based poster content and evaluation rather than EBP posters. To facilitate timely and quality dissemination of EBP projects, there is a need for clear criteria identifying the essential information to be shared, how to share it effectively, and how to evaluate the end product. Thus far, the challenge to better accommodate EBP poster presentations has been unmet. The purposes of this article are to provide suggestions for EBP poster creation and to describe the process of developing a Poster Evaluation Rubric for Evidence-Based Practice (PER-EBP). The PER-EBP tool, developed by the authors, provides a guide for EBP poster creation and criteria for EBP poster evaluation by self and others. Examples of an EBP literature review and a DNP student poster are provided.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan T. Shaffer ◽  
Colleen D. Zarnowsky ◽  
Renee C. Green ◽  
Mei-Lin Chen Lim ◽  
Brenda M. Holtzer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
Katrina Fulcher-Rood ◽  
Anny Castilla-Earls ◽  
Jeff Higginbotham

Purpose The current investigation is a follow-up from a previous study examining child language diagnostic decision making in school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of this study was to examine the SLPs' perspectives regarding the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in their clinical work. Method Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 25 school-based SLPs who previously participated in an earlier study by Fulcher-Rood et al. 2018). SLPs were asked questions regarding their definition of EBP, the value of research evidence, contexts in which they implement scientific literature in clinical practice, and the barriers to implementing EBP. Results SLPs' definitions of EBP differed from current definitions, in that SLPs only included the use of research findings. SLPs seem to discuss EBP as it relates to treatment and not assessment. Reported barriers to EBP implementation were insufficient time, limited funding, and restrictions from their employment setting. SLPs found it difficult to translate research findings to clinical practice. SLPs implemented external research evidence when they did not have enough clinical expertise regarding a specific client or when they needed scientific evidence to support a strategy they used. Conclusions SLPs appear to use EBP for specific reasons and not for every clinical decision they make. In addition, SLPs rely on EBP for treatment decisions and not for assessment decisions. Educational systems potentially present other challenges that need to be considered for EBP implementation. Considerations for implementation science and the research-to-practice gap are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document