Secondary endings of muscle spindles: Structure, reflex action, role in motor control and proprioception

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W Banks ◽  
PH Ellaway ◽  
Arthur Prochazka ◽  
Uwe Proske
1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Richard Nichols
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-344
Author(s):  
R. W. BANKS ◽  
D. BARKER ◽  
H. G. BROWN

The common peroneal nerve was transected and repaired by epineurial suture in nine cats. In a further nine the nerve was transected twice and similarly repaired so as to produce a short autograft. Recovery of stretch receptors in peroneus brevis was monitored histologically and physiologically from six to fifty weeks. In recovery after single neurotomy functionally identifiable muscle-spindle and tendon-organ afferents were reduced to 25% and 45% of normal, respectively; after double neurotomy (autograft) both were reduced to about 10% of normal. Muscle spindles were reinnervated with annulospiral terminals, or wholly abnormal fine axon terminals, or both. Recovery evidently entails not only a reduction in number of stretch afferents, but also the making of some incorrect reconnections that presumably result in abnormal proprioceptive feedback and reflex action. When a graft is used the sensory impairment is compounded.


1964 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. C. Matthews

2002 ◽  
Vol 44-46 ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Gilbert Nielsen

Physiology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Proske

A brief, summarizing description is given of the structure and physiology of the mammalian muscle spindle. The question is addressed, What might be the roles of the three different kinds of intrafusal fibers on which the sensory endings lie? The role of muscle spindles in proprioception and in motor control is discussed.


1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Bizzi ◽  
P. Dev ◽  
P. Morasso ◽  
A. Polit

1. We have investigated the relative contributions of mechanical and reflex mechanisms in generating the forces produced by the neck muscles when loads were unexpectedly applied during centrally programmed head movements in monkeys. These movements, subserved by muscles well endowed with muscle spindles, are part of the coordinated eye-head response to the appearance of a stimulus in the animal's visual field. Our preparation was a chronically vestibulectomized monkey trained to make a visual discrimination. 2. Two procedures were used to evaluate the torque generated by the neck musculature when an unexpected load disturbance was applied: first, by surgically interrupting the afferent loop subserving the reflex action (section of cervical dorsal roots) and second, by building a mathematical model of the head-neck system and carrying out a process of simulation. 3. Our results indicated that the compensatory torque of reflex origin stimulated by the application of an opposing force was less than 10--30% of that required for perfect compensation, and the larger fraction of the observed compensation was due to the mechanical properties (inertial, viscous, and elastic) of the neck musculature. The combined action of reflex and mechanical processes never completely compensated for the disturbance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Erin M. Wilson ◽  
Ignatius S. B. Nip

Abstract Although certain speech development milestones are readily observable, the developmental course of speech motor control is largely unknown. However, recent advances in facial motion tracking systems have been used to investigate articulator movements in children and the findings from these studies are being used to further our understanding of the physiologic basis of typical and disordered speech development. Physiologic work has revealed that the emergence of speech is highly dependent on the lack of flexibility in the early oromotor system. It also has been determined that the progression of speech motor development is non-linear, a finding that has motivated researchers to investigate how variables such as oromotor control, cognition, and linguistic factors affect speech development in the form of catalysts and constraints. Physiologic data are also being used to determine if non-speech oromotor behaviors play a role in the development of speech. This improved understanding of the physiology underlying speech, as well as the factors influencing its progression, helps inform our understanding of speech motor control in children with disordered speech and provide a framework for theory-driven therapeutic approaches to treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document