Inferring Humor Styles Through Men’s Formidability

Men’s formidability is inferred multimodally through various facial and bodily features. Such inferences frequently provide downstream perceptions of various traits and motivational states that inform subsequent affiliative decisions. Within these inferences could be an implicit understanding of men’s preferred humor styles. Across four studies, this research considered perceptions of men’s proclivity to employ each of the four humor styles through different formidability cues: upper body strength (Study 1), body muscularity (Study 2), facial width-to-height ratio (Study 3), and neck musculature (Study 4). Results indicated a relatively consistent perception of formidable features being diagnostic of men’s interest in aggressive humor. Additional findings indicate certain formidability cues connote a disinterest in self-defeating and self-enhancing humor. Facial and bodily cues finally connoted affiliative humor in different capacities. We frame findings from an evolutionary perspective based on perceptions of the various benefits and costs of different formidability features.

Overcoming a 'forbidden phenotype': The parrot's head supports, propels, and powers tripedal locomotion

No vertebrate, living or extinct, is known to have possessed an odd number of limbs. Despite this ″forbidden phenotype″, gaits that utilize odd numbers of limbs (e.g., tripedalism or pentapedalism) have evolved in both avian and mammalian lineages. Tripedal locomotion is commonly employed by parrots during climbing, who utilize their beaks as an additional support. However, it is unclear whether the beak functions simply as a stabilizing hook, or as a propulsive limb. Here, we present data on kinetics of tripedal climbing in six rosy –faced lovebirds (Agapornis rosiecollis). Our findings demonstrate that parrots utilize cyclical tripedal gaits when climbing and the beak and hindlimbs generate comparable propulsive and tangential substrate reaction forces and power. Propulsive and tangential forces generated by the beak are of equal or greater magnitudes to those forces generated by the forelimbs of humans and non –human primates during vertical climbing. We conclude that the feeding apparatus and neck musculature of parrots has been co–opted to function biomechanically as a third limb during vertical climbing. We hypothesize that this exaptation required substantive alterations to the neuromuscular system including enhanced force–generating capabilities of the neck musculature and modifications to limb central pattern generators.

Intersexual and intrasexual selection for neck musculature in men: Attractiveness, dominance, and actual fighting success

Countless organisms are equipped with physiological armor that reduce damage from opponents. Because humans have sustained a long evolutionary history of hand-to-hand combat, selection would have been placed on morphological structures which reduce rotational acceleration to the head and increase the likelihood of victory. Grounded in over 60 years of sports performance theory and recent theoretical work in evolutionary biology, geometric morphometric analyses revealed that larger neck musculature in professional combatants (N = 715) was associated with greater real-world fighting success, after for adjusting for allometry (Study 1). Because sexual dimorphism emerges from selection on morphological structures that improve men’s fighting success, we then discovered that the human neck is the most sexually dimorphic feature of human anatomy when compared to 91 other anatomical features (N = 6,068; Study 2). This male-biased sexual dimorphism held after controlling for these 91 allometric measurements, and held across every world region (Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania, and North, Central, and South America). Because human psychological systems consequently evolved to attend to men’s secondary sexual characteristics, we discovered that men (N = 564 stimuli) with larger neck musculature (Study 3: geometric morphometrics; Study 4: physiological neck strength; Study 5: photorealistic stimuli) are rated (N = 772 raters) as stronger, more masculine, and higher in fighting ability and short-term attractiveness, after accounting for allometry. Combined, our research introduced a new secondary sexual characteristic to the biological, anthropological, and psychological sciences: the human neck.

Intrasexual and intersexual selection for neck musculature in men

Over 150 years ago, Darwin (1871) argued that humans evolved to inflict and resist damage in violent combat. Until now, however, no research has examined the claim that humans have evolved anatomical structures to both better inflict and resist damage in real-world agonistic exchanges. Human neck musculature has long been theoretically implicated in force output and concussion resistance capacities, and we proposed that human neck musculature evolved to increase damage resistance (knockout resistance) and damage infliction (knockout power) in real-world violent combat. Larger neck musculature was indeed associated with greater fighting success, knockout resistance, and knockout power capabilities across 715 professional combatants, after comprehensively controlling for weight, height, age, fighter's debut date, sex, reach, leg reach, and facial structure (Study 1). We then discovered that human neck musculature is one of the most sexually dimorphic human anatomical features, when compared against over 70 other human anatomical features (Study 2; N = 6000). We then found that human psychological systems have evolved to generate social perceptions in response to neck musculature. Men with greater physiological neck strength are perceived as stronger fighters (Study 3, after controlling for weight, height, age, beardedness, and torso, arm, bicep, and lower body strength). Study 4 specifically showed that men with larger sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius muscles -- muscles implicated in damage resistance and infliction, respectively -- are perceived as more dominant (i.e., strong, masculine, anger-prone, and aggressive) and attractive (i.e., short and long-term attractiveness). Our results comprehensively demonstrate that human neck musculature evolved to increase resource-holding potential in violent combat, for which human psychological systems have consequently evolved an attraction. Given that human neck musculature is novel to the psychological and biological sciences, implications are discussed for the research areas of formidability assessment, contest competition, violence, face perception, emotion recognition, attraction and relationship research, political and organisational psychology, sports performance, and biomedical research.

Neck Muscular Load When Using a Smartphone While Sitting, Standing, and Walking

Objective Myoelectric activity of neck extensor muscles and head kinematic variables, when using a smartphone for one-handed browsing and two-handed texting while sitting, standing, and walking, were evaluated to compare the neck muscular load during these tasks and across the posture conditions. Background There has been limited research on the relation between head-down postures and the muscular load on the neck of smartphone users. Methods Twenty-one asymptomatic young users were asked to perform one-handed browsing and two-handed texting tasks in each of the posture conditions, and the myoelectric activities of the neck extensor muscles, head kinematic variables, and upper back posture were quantified. Results The muscle activation level when using a phone during walking was 21.2% and 41.7% higher than that of sitting and standing on average ( p < .01). Head vertical and angular accelerations were also significantly greater ( p < .01) for walking than for sitting and standing conditions. Between the two conducted tasks, participants flexed their heads more significantly ( p < .01) with higher activation of the neck extensor muscles ( p < .01) when texting as compared to when browsing. Conclusion Results indicate that two-handed texting while walking would be the most physically demanding scenario for neck musculature, and it might be attributable to the dynamics of the head while walking with the head facing downwards. Application These findings can be used to better understand the potential relation between smartphone use and the occurrence of neck musculoskeletal problems and to inform the users of the ergonomic risks of using smartphones while walking.