Evolutionary Approach to Function Model Synthesis: Development of Parameterization and Synthesis Rules

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amaninder Gill ◽  
Chiradeep Sen
Author(s):  
Amaninder Singh Gill ◽  
Chiradeep Sen

Abstract The goal of this paper is to develop the groundwork for automated synthesis of function models. To this end, an evolutionary algorithm based framework has been developed. A parameterization method that can completely describe any given function models has been proposed. The parameterization makes the function models compatible for use within the evolutionary algorithm framework. Validation of the parameterization method is carried out by using an evolutionary algorithm to synthesize the function models for five different electromechanical products. The algorithm converged in each case, indicating that the method is satisfactory and that function models can actually be synthesized using an evolutionary framework. In addition, the adaptation of several a priori rules for use in this framework has been proposed. These rules are categorized as grammar, logical and feature based rules. An updated evolutionary framework that incorporates these rules is also presented.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amaninder Singh Gil ◽  
Chiradeep Sen

Abstract This paper presents the development of logic rules for evaluating the fitness of function models synthesized by an evolutionary algorithm. A set of 65 rules for twelve different function verbs are developed. The rules are abstractions of the definitions of the verbs in their original vocabularies and are stated as constraints on the quantity, type, and topology of flows connected to the functions. The rules serve as an objective and unambiguous basis of evaluating the fitness of function models developed by a genetic algorithm. The said algorithm and the rules are implemented in software code, which is used to both demonstrate and validate the efficacy of the rule-based approach of converging function model synthesis using GAs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.


Author(s):  
Carmen García-Alba

This study is part of a larger research study (doctoral dissertation), in which a comparative study with adolescent samples is done: 50 anorexic restricting patients (ANP), 50 patients diagnosed with depression (DP) and 50 non patients (NP). The proposed objective is two-fold: 1) To try to clarify the existing relationship between Anorexia (AN) and Depression (D), investigated from diverse disciplines but without conclusive results. 2) To detect in the ANP personality different traits from those of other groups, which should, if possible, allow to detect them at an early stage for an adequate prognosis. The current article presents the Rorschach findings in relation to the cognitive functioning of the ANP. In them, the following has been detected: (1) An information processing similar to that of the other groups, even with a more complete (L ≤ .99), more complex (DQ+↑) and better discriminated (Zd↑) grasp of the stimulus; (2) Mediating processes very similar to those of the other groups, sharing with them the perceptive maladjustments (X–%↑) and an excessive individualism (Xu%↑); (3) A clearly differentiating ideation disorder. Definitely, the ANP use predominantly ideation (M↑), but their thought, usually well-adjusted (MQo↑), presents eventual operations of delusional type (MQnone↑). Above that, their thinking is marked by a great passivity (Mp↑), which makes them more vulnerable to accept ideas without criticizing them and it results in a very inefficient thinking, which spins around these concepts without finding solutions, entering into a sort of ruminating which is completely unproductive. The differences toward the obsessive pathology are established. The discriminant analysis conducted with all the Rorschach variables that resulted as significant throughout the research, provides quite a consistent function which discriminates the ANP: MQnone↑, Mp↑, FD↓, Ma↑, MQo↑, AdjD↑, Sum H↑, (H)↑. Based on this we can understand that these adolescents, being in a developmental period of big changes and disorientations in relation with their own image, confronted with life events, and possibly starting off with some biologic vulnerability: (1) Due to the alterations of their ideation, accept without criticism (Mp) irrational ideas dominating in our culture, in which slimness appears as the only model, synthesis of intelligence, beauty and success; remaining captured in this type of mental activity (MQnone), which they cannot escape nor criticize (Mp), despite they reason adequately on other topics (MQo); (2) Their alterations of self-perception [(H)] make them hide themselves in a fantasized image, which is the axis of their interests and the only thing that really matters to them; (3) The resources they have to decide on behaviors and to finish these deliberately (AdjD), and their scarce tendency to the introspection (FD) lead to their decision of not eating, based on distorted and passively accepted thinking, which has great power and thus, so difficult to modify. Finally, based on the Rorschach data obtained, the hypothesis of a personality disorder as underlying pathology is pointed out.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1007-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan A. Mace ◽  
Abigail B. Waters ◽  
Kayle S. Sawyer ◽  
Taylor Turrisi ◽  
David A. Gansler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document