Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Robotic System Dynamic Performance

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan P. Bowling ◽  
John E. Renaud ◽  
Jeremy T. Newkirk ◽  
Neal M. Patel ◽  
Harish Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reference Point ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Dynamic Performance ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Robotic System ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
End Effector ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliable Design

In this investigation a robotic system’s dynamic performance is optimized for high reliability under uncertainty. The dynamic capability equations (DCE) allow designers to predict the dynamic performance of a robotic system for a particular configuration and reference point on the end effector (i.e., point design). Here the DCE are used in conjunction with a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) strategy in order to obtain designs with robust dynamic performance with respect to the end-effector reference point. In this work a unilevel performance measure approach is used to perform RBDO. This is important for the reliable design of robotic systems in which a solution to the DCE is required for each constraint call. The method is illustrated on a robot design problem.

Reliability Based Design Optimization of Robotic System Dynamic Performance

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Bowling ◽  
John E. Renaud ◽  
Neal M. Patel ◽  
Jeremy Newkirk ◽  
Harish Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Dynamic Performance ◽  
Robotic System ◽  
System Dynamic ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design

scholarly journals Efficient optimum safety factor approach for system reliability-based design optimization with application to composite yarns

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gh. Kharmanda ◽  
I. R. Antypas
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Safety Factor ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Implementation Framework ◽  
Reliability Level ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Convergence Stability

Introduction. The integration of reliability and optimization concepts seeks to design structures that should be both economic and reliable. This model is called Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO). In fact, the coupling between the mechanical modelling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational cost and weak convergence stability. Materials andMethods. Several methods have been developed to overcome these difficulties. The methods called Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA) are two alternative methods. RIA describes the probabilistic constraint as a reliability index while PMA was proposed by converting the probability measure to a performance measure. An Optimum Safety Factor (OSF) method is proposed to compute safety factors satisfying a required reliability level without demanding additional computing cost for the reliability evaluation. The OSF equations are formulated considering RIA and PMA and extended to multiple failure case.Research Results. Several linear and nonlinear distribution laws are applied to composite yarns studies and then extended to multiple failure modes. It has been shown that the idea of the OSF method is to avoid the reliability constraint evaluation with a particular optimization process.Discussion and Conclusions. The simplified implementation framework of the OSF strategy consists of decoupling the optimization and the reliability analyses. It provides designers with efficient solutions that should be economic satisfying a required reliability level. It is demonstrated that the RBDO compared to OSF has several advantages: small number of optimization variables, good convergence stability, small computing time, satisfaction of the required reliability levels.

A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tu ◽  
K. K. Choi ◽  
Y. H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Special Cases

This paper presents a general approach for probabilistic constraint evaluation in the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Different perspectives of the general approach are consistent in prescribing the probabilistic constraint, where the conventional reliability index approach (RIA) and the proposed performance measure approach (PMA) are identified as two special cases. PMA is shown to be inherently robust and more efficient in evaluating inactive probabilistic constraints, while RIA is more efficient for violated probabilistic constraints. Moreover, RBDO often yields a higher rate of convergence by using PMA, while RIA yields singularity in some cases.

Iterative reliable design space approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Jiang ◽  
Haobo Qiu ◽  
Xiaoke Li ◽  
Zhenzhong Chen ◽  
Liang Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliable Design ◽  
Space Approach

Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeng D. Youn ◽  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Young H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Equality Constraint ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Function ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Advanced Mean Value

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) involves evaluation of probabilistic constraints, which can be done in two different ways, the reliability index approach (RIA) and the performance measure approach (PMA). It has been reported in the literature that RIA yields instability for some problems but PMA is robust and efficient in identifying a probabilistic failure mode in the optimization process. However, several examples of numerical tests of PMA have also shown instability and inefficiency in the RBDO process if the advanced mean value (AMV) method, which is a numerical tool for probabilistic constraint evaluation in PMA, is used, since it behaves poorly for a concave performance function, even though it is effective for a convex performance function. To overcome difficulties of the AMV method, the conjugate mean value (CMV) method is proposed in this paper for the concave performance function in PMA. However, since the CMV method exhibits the slow rate of convergence for the convex function, it is selectively used for concave-type constraints. That is, once the type of the performance function is identified, either the AMV method or the CMV method can be adaptively used for PMA during the RBDO iteration to evaluate probabilistic constraints effectively. This is referred to as the hybrid mean value (HMV) method. The enhanced PMA with the HMV method is compared to RIA for effective evaluation of probabilistic constraints in the RBDO process. It is shown that PMA with a spherical equality constraint is easier to solve than RIA with a complicated equality constraint in estimating the probabilistic constraint in the RBDO process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document