Computational Study of Flow Characteristics of Thick and Thin Airfoil With Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation at Low Reynolds Number

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoji Kojima ◽  
Taku Nonomura ◽  
Akira Oyama ◽  
Kozo Fujii
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Naca0012 Airfoil ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Implicit Large Eddy Simulation

The flow fields around NACA0012 and NACA0002 at Reynolds number of 23,000, and their aerodynamic characteristics are analyzed. Computations are conducted with implicit large-eddy simulation solver and Reynolds-averaged-Navier-Stokes solver. Around this Reynolds number, the flow over an airfoil separates, transits and reattaches, resulting in generation of a laminar separation bubble at angle of attack in the range of certain degrees. Over a NACA0012 airfoil a separation point moves toward its leading edge with increasing angle of attack, and a separated flow may transit to create a short bubble. On the other hand, over a NACA0002 airfoil a separation point is kept at its leading edge, and a separated flow may transit to create a long bubble. Moreover, there appears nonlinearity in lift curve for NACA0012 airfoil, but does not appear in that for NACA0002 in spite of existence of a laminar separation bubble.

Detailed Numerical Characterization of the Suction Side Laminar Separation Bubble for a High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine Blade by Means of RANS and LES

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Bigoni ◽  
Stefano Vagnoli ◽  
Tony Arts ◽  
Tom Verstraete
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

The scope of this work is to obtain a deep insight of the occurrence, development and evolution of the laminar separation bubble which occurs on the suction side of the high-lift T106-C low pressure turbine blade operated at correct engine Mach and Reynolds numbers. The commercial codes Numeca FINE/Turbo and FINE/Open were used for the numerical investigation of a set of three different Reynolds numbers. Two different CFD approaches, characterized by a progressively increasing level of complexity and detail in the solution, have been employed, starting from a steady state RANS analysis and ending with a Large Eddy Simulation. Particular attention was paid to the study of the open separation occurring at the lowest Reynolds number, for which a Large Eddy Simulation was performed in order to try to correctly capture the involved phenomena and their characteristic frequencies. In addition, the potentialities of the codes employed for the analysis have been assessed.

Leading Edge Separation From a Blunt Plate at Low Reynolds Number

1980 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Lane ◽  
R. I. Loehrke
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Plate Thickness ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Separated Shear Layer ◽  
Separation Zones ◽  
Edge Separation ◽  
Steady Laminar

The flow over a blunt plate aligned parallel to the stream was visualized using dye tracers. A leading edge separation bubble was observed to form at a Reynolds number based on plate thickness of 100. The steady, laminar separation bubble on a long plate, L/t ≥ 8, grows in size with increasing Reynolds number reaching a maximum streamwise length at Ret = 325. The separated shear layer becomes unsteady and the bubble shrinks in size with further increases in Reynolds number. The leading and trailing edge separation zones on short plates, L/t ≤ 4, may combine to form a large recirculation pocket.

Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation of Laminar Separation Bubbles at Moderate Reynolds Numbers

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Cadieux ◽  
Julian A. Domaradzki ◽  
Taraneh Sayadi ◽  
Sanjeeb Bose
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Direct Numerical Simulation ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Transition To Turbulence ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Large Eddy

Flows over airfoils and blades in rotating machinery for unmanned and microaerial vehicles, wind turbines, and propellers consist of different flow regimes. A laminar boundary layer near the leading edge is often followed by a laminar separation bubble with a shear layer on top of it that experiences transition to turbulence. The separated turbulent flow then reattaches and evolves downstream from a nonequilibrium turbulent boundary layer to an equilibrium one. Typical Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling methods were shown to be inadequate for such laminar separation bubble flows (Spalart and Strelets, 2000, “Mechanisms of Transition and Heat Transfer in a Separation Bubble,” J. Fluid Mech., 403, pp. 329–349). Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is the most reliable but is also the most computationally expensive alternative. This work assesses the capability of large eddy simulations (LES) to reduce the resolution requirements for such flows. Flow over a flat plate with suitable velocity boundary conditions away from the plate to produce a separation bubble is considered. Benchmark DNS data for this configuration are generated with the resolution of 59 × 106 mesh points; also used is a different DNS database with 15 × 106 points (Spalart and Strelets, 2000, “Mechanisms of Transition and Heat Transfer in a Separation Bubble,” J. Fluid Mech., 403, pp. 329–349). Results confirm that accurate LES are possible using O(1%) of the DNS resolution.

scholarly journals Modeling and Control of Dynamic Stall Loads on a Smart Airfoil at Low Reynolds Number

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 4958
Author(s):  
Ayman Mohamed ◽  
David Wood ◽  
Jeffery Pieper
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Dynamic Stall ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Real Time Control ◽  
Trailing Edge ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Modeling And Control ◽  
Trailing Edge Flap

This article describes the development and testing of a modified, semi-empirical ONERA dynamic stall model for an airfoil with a trailing edge flap—a “smart airfoil”—pitching at reduced frequencies up to 0.1. The Reynolds number is 105. The model reconstructs the load fluctuations associated with the shedding of multiple dynamic stall vortices (DSVs) in a time-marching solution, which makes it suitable for real-time control of a trailing edge flap (TEF). No other model captures the effect of the DSVs on the aerodynamic loads on smart airfoils. The model was refined and tuned for force measurements on a smart NACA 643-618 airfoil model that was pitching with an inactive TEF and was validated against the measurements when the TEF was activated. A substantial laminar separation bubble can develop on this airfoil, which is challenging for modelers of the unsteady response. A closed-loop controller was designed offline in SIMULINK, and the output of the controller was applied to the TEF in a wind tunnel. The results indicated that the model has a comparable accuracy for predicting loads with the active TEF compared to inactive TEF loads. In the fully separated flow regime, the controller performed worse when dealing with the development of the laminar separation bubble and DSVs.

The onset of dynamic stall at a high, transitional Reynolds number

2018 ◽  
Vol 861 ◽  
pp. 860-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. I. Benton ◽  
M. R. Visbal
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Dynamic Stall ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Separation ◽  
Large Eddy

Dynamic stall due to a ramp-type pitching motion is investigated on the NACA 0012 airfoil at chord Reynolds number of $Re_{c}=1.0\times 10^{6}$ through the use of wall-resolved large-eddy simulation. Emphasis is placed on the unsteady boundary-layer interactions that develop as the airfoil approaches stall. At this Reynolds number it is shown that turbulent separation moves upstream across much of the airfoil suction surface. When turbulent separation reaches the leading-edge separation bubble, a bursting event is initiated leading to a strong coherent leading-edge vortex structure. This vortex wraps up the turbulent shear layer to form a large dynamic stall vortex. The use of large-eddy simulation elucidates the roll of the laminar separation bubble in defining the onset of the dynamic stall process. Comparisons are made to identical simulations at lower Reynolds numbers of $Re_{c}=0.2\times 10^{6}$ and $0.5\times 10^{6}$. This comparison demonstrates trends in the boundary-layer mechanics that explain the sensitivity of the dynamic stall process to Reynolds number.

An experimental investigation of a laminar separation bubble on the leading-edge of a modelled aerofoil for different Reynolds numbers

2015 ◽  
Vol 230 (13) ◽  
pp. 2208-2224 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Samson ◽  
S Sarkar
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Layer ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Constant Thickness ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Separated Shear Layer

This paper describes the dynamics of a laminar separation bubble formed on the semi-circular leading edge of constant thickness aerofoil model. Detailed experimental studies are carried out in a low-speed wind tunnel, where surface pressure and time-averaged velocity in the separated region and as well as in the downstream are presented along with flow field visualisations through PIV for various Reynolds numbers ranging from 25,000 to 75,000 (based on the leading edge diameter). The results illustrate that the separated shear layer is laminar up to 20% of separation length and then the perturbations are amplified in the second half attributing to breakdown and reattachment. The bubble length is highly susceptible to change in Reynolds number and plays an important role in outer layer activities. Further, the transition of a separated shear layer is studied through variation of intermittency factor and comparing with existing correlations available in the literature for attached flow and as well as separated flow. Transition of the separated shear layer occurs through formation of K-H rolls, where the intermittency following spot propagation theory appears valid. The predominant shedding frequency when normalised with respect to the momentum thickness at separation remains almost constant with change in Reynolds number. The relaxation is slow after reattachment and the flow takes about five bubble lengths to approach a canonical layer.

Large-Eddy Simulations of Owl-Like Wing Under Low Reynolds Number Conditions

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Kondo ◽  
Hikaru Aono ◽  
Taku Nonomura ◽  
Akira Oyama ◽  
Kozo Fujii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Separation Bubble ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Flow Fields ◽  
Pressure Side ◽  
Laminar Separation Bubble ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Drag Ratio ◽  
Lift To Drag Ratio

Flow fields around an owl-like wing and aerodynamic characteristics at a chord Reynolds number of 23,000 are investigated using three-dimensional implicit large-eddy simulation. The cross sectional profile of the owl wing model named “owl-like wing” is constructed based on the owl wing at 40% of the span length from the root. It consists of flat upper surface, large camber, and thin geometry. Results show that at low angles of attack (α), separation, transition, and reattachment are observed in the instantaneous flow fields on the pressure side. The laminar separation bubbles can be seen in time- and span-averaged flow fields. It is likely that lift and drag generation is correlated with the location of separation points on the suction side. However, it has little influence on behavior of CL-α curve. On the other hand, at high angles of attack, the flow on the pressure side is fully attached. The flow on the suction side is similar to that of the pressure side at low angles of attack. It is found that unlike the case of the flow at the low angles of attack, the laminar separation bubble on the suction side affects the response of CL to variation of α. Furthermore, it is possible to decrease the drag and to increase the lift when the location of the laminar separation bubble is well organized by an appropriate airfoil surface geometry. Also, the deeply concaved lower surface contributes to lift enhancement. From those factors mentioned above, the owl-like wing gains higher lift-to-drag ratio comparing with conventional thin and thick symmetrical airfoils such as NACA0002 and NACA0012. Indeed, maximum lift-to-drag ratio of the owl-like wing is approximately 23 at the angle of attack of 6.0 degrees at Reynolds number of 23,000.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document