The Skewboid Method: A Simple and Effective Approach to Pareto Relaxation and Filtering

Author(s):  
Matthew I. Campbell

The concept of Pareto optimality is the default method for pruning a large set of candidate solutions in a multi-objective problem to a manageable, balanced, and rational set of solutions. While the Pareto optimality approach is simple and sound, it may select too many or too few solutions for the decision-maker’s needs or the needs of optimization process (e.g. the number of survivors selected in a population-based optimization). This inability to achieve a target number of solutions to keep has caused a number of researchers to devise methods to either remove some of the non-dominated solutions via Pareto filtering or to retain some dominated solutions via Pareto relaxation. Both filtering and relaxation methods tend to introduce many new adjustment parameters that a decision-maker (DM) must specify. In the presented Skewboid method, only a single parameter is defined for both relaxing the Pareto optimality condition (values between −1 and 0) and filtering more solutions from the Pareto optimal set (values between 0 and 1). This parameter can be correlated with a desired number of solutions so that this number of solutions is input instead of an unintuitive adjustment parameter. A mathematically sound derivation of the Skewboid method is presented followed by illustrative examples of its use. The paper concludes with a discussion of the method in comparison to similar methods in the literature.

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Giagkiozis ◽  
Peter J. Fleming

The set of available multi-objective optimisation algorithms continues to grow. This fact can be partially attributed to their widespread use and applicability. However, this increase also suggests several issues remain to be addressed satisfactorily. One such issue is the diversity and the number of solutions available to the decision maker (DM). Even for algorithms very well suited for a particular problem, it is difficult—mainly due to the computational cost—to use a population large enough to ensure the likelihood of obtaining a solution close to the DM's preferences. In this paper we present a novel methodology that produces additional Pareto optimal solutions from a Pareto optimal set obtained at the end run of any multi-objective optimisation algorithm for two-objective and three-objective problem instances.


2017 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Previati ◽  
Gianpiero Mastinu ◽  
Massimiliano Gobbi

The paper deals with the problem of choosing the material and the cross section of a beam subjected to bending under structural safety, elastic stability, and available room constraints. An extension of the theory proposed by Ashby is presented. The Pareto-optimal set for the multi-objective problem of stiffness maximization and mass minimization under elastic stability, structural safety, and available room constraints for a beam under bending is derived analytically. The Pareto-optimal set is compared with the solution of the Ashby's selection method.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanyou Y. Zeng ◽  
Lishan S. Kang ◽  
Lixin X. Ding

In this paper, an orthogonal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (OMOEA) is proposed for multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) with constraints. Firstly, these constraints are taken into account when determining Pareto dominance. As a result, a strict partial-ordered relation is obtained, and feasibility is not considered later in the selection process. Then, the orthogonal design and the statistical optimal method are generalized to MOPs, and a new type of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) is constructed. In this framework, an original niche evolves first, and splits into a group of sub-niches. Then every sub-niche repeats the above process. Due to the uniformity of the search, the optimality of the statistics, and the exponential increase of the splitting frequency of the niches, OMOEA uses a deterministic search without blindness or stochasticity. It can soon yield a large set of solutions which converges to the Pareto-optimal set with high precision and uniform distribution. We take six test problems designed by Deb, Zitzler et al., and an engineering problem (W) with constraints provided by Ray et al. to test the new technique. The numerical experiments show that our algorithm is superior to other MOGAS and MOEAs, such as FFGA, NSGAII, SPEA2, and so on, in terms of the precision, quantity and distribution of solutions. Notably, for the engineering problem W, it finds the Pareto-optimal set, which was previously unknown.


Author(s):  
Federico Maria Ballo ◽  
Massimiliano Gobbi ◽  
Giampiero Mastinu ◽  
Giorgio Previati

Author(s):  
Leonard P. Pomrehn ◽  
Panos Y. Papalambros

Abstract This article proposes a method for optimally approximating real values with rational numbers. Such requirements arise in the design of various types of gear sets, where integer numbers of gear teeth force individual stage ratios to assume rational values. The kinematic design of an 18-speed gearbox, taken from the literature, is analyzed and solved using the proposed method. The method, called sequential exhaustion, sequentially considers each stage of the gearbox design, exhaustively examining each stage. Examination of 94 solutions leads to a pareto-optimal set containing 11 solutions. Further, although the layout of the gearbox is predefined for the kinematic design problem, certain solutions of the problem exhibit “non-reducing” gear pairs, revealing previously unforeseen changes in the gearbox layout.


Author(s):  
F. Levi ◽  
M. Gobbi ◽  
M. Farina ◽  
G. Mastinu

In the paper, the problem of choosing a single final design solution among a large set of Pareto-optimal solutions is addressed. Two methods, the k-optimality approach and the more general k-ε-optimality method will be introduced. These two methods theoretically justify and mathematically define the designer’s tendency to choose solutions which are “in the middle” of the Pareto-optimal set. These two methods have been applied to the solution of a relatively simple engineering problem, i.e. the selection of the stiffness and damping of a passively suspended vehicle in order to get the best compromise between discomfort, road holding and working space. The final design solution, found by means of the k-ε-optimality approach seems consistent with the solution selected by skilled suspensions specialists. Finally the k-optimality method has proved to be very effective also when applied to complex engineering problems. The optimization of the tyre/suspension system of a sports car has been formulated as a design problem with 18 objective functions. A large set of Pareto-optimal solutions have been computed. Again, the k-optimality approach has proved to be a useful tool for the selection of a fully satisfactory final design solution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document