Near-Hole Thermal Field Measurements for Round Compound Angle Film Cooling Holes Fed by Cross-Flow

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. McClintic ◽  
Ellen K. Wilkes ◽  
David G. Bogard ◽  
Jason E. Dees ◽  
Gregory M. Laskowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Thermal Field ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Rectangular Channel ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

The effectiveness of film cooling from short cooling holes, scaled to engine conditions, has been shown to be dependent on the nature of the internal coolant feed. A common method of supplying coolant to film cooling holes in engine components is through an internal cross-flow, which causes skewed effectiveness profiles on the surface of film cooled parts. For round axial holes, this effect causes coolant jets to more effectively spread across the surface. Additionally, for compound angle round holes, the direction of the cross-flow relative to the direction of injection has a substantial effect on film cooling effectiveness. A cross-flow directed counter to the span-wise direction of coolant injection has previously been shown to cause greater lateral jet spreading than cross-flow directed in-line with the span-wise injection direction. To better understand the phenomena responsible for the improved coolant spreading, two-dimensional thermal field profiles were measured downstream of compound angle film cooling holes fed by an internal cross-flow. A smooth-walled rectangular channel was used to produce an internal cross-flow in both a counter and in-line flow direction. Thermal field cross-section data was collected at three stream-wise locations: 0.7, 3.4, and 8.8 diameters downstream of the holes. Blowing ratios of 0.75 and 1.00 were studied at a density ratio of 1.5. Experiments were performed in a low speed recirculating wind tunnel at high mainstream turbulence with a thick approach boundary layer relative to the film cooling holes. It was found that the improved lateral spreading observed in the coolant jets fed by a counter cross-flow occurred due to the formation of a bulge on the downstream side of the jet.

The Effect of Rib Turbulators on Film Cooling Effectiveness of Round Compound Angle Holes Fed by an Internal Cross-Flow

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean R. Klavetter ◽  
John W. McClintic ◽  
David G. Bogard ◽  
Jason E. Dees ◽  
Gregory M. Laskowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Local Pressure ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Rib Turbulators ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Early stage gas turbine blades feature complicated internal geometries in order to enhance internal heat transfer and to supply coolant for film cooling. Most film cooling experiments decouple the effect of internal coolant feed from external film cooling effectiveness, even though engine parts are commonly fed by cross-flow and feature internal rib turbulators which can affect film cooling. Experiments measuring adiabatic effectiveness were conducted to investigate the effects of turbulated perpendicular cross-flow on a row of 45 deg compound angle cylindrical film cooling holes for a total of eight internal rib configurations. The ribs were angled to the direction of prevailing internal cross-flow at two different angles: 45 deg or 135 deg. The ribs were also positioned at two different spanwise locations relative to the cooling holes: in the middle of the cooling hole pitch and slightly intersecting the holes. Experiments were conducted at a density ratio of DR = 1.5 for a range of blowing ratios including M = 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. This study demonstrates that peak effectiveness can be attained through the optimization of cross-flow direction relative to the compound angle direction and rib configuration, verifying the importance of hole inlet conditions in film cooling experiments. It was found that ribs tend to reduce adiabatic effectiveness relative to a baseline, smooth-walled configuration. Rib configurations that directed the internal coolant forward in the direction of the mainstream resulted in higher peak adiabatic effectiveness. However, no other parameters could consistently be identified correlating to increased film cooling performance. It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for influencing performance, including internal local pressure caused by the ribs, the internal channel flow field, in-hole vortices, and jet exit velocity profiles. This study also attempted to replicate the possibility that film cooling holes may intersect ribs and found that a hole which partially intersects a rib still maintains moderate levels of effectiveness.

The Effect of Rib Turbulators on Film Cooling Effectiveness of Round Compound Angle Holes Fed by an Internal Cross-Flow

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean R. Klavetter ◽  
John W. McClintic ◽  
David G. Bogard ◽  
Jason E. Dees ◽  
Gregory M. Laskowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Local Pressure ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Rib Turbulators ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

Early stage gas turbine blades feature complicated internal geometries in order to enhance internal heat transfer and to supply coolant for film cooling. Most film cooling experiments decouple the effect of internal coolant feed from external film cooling effectiveness, even though engine parts are commonly fed by cross-flow and feature internal rib turbulators which can affect film cooling. Experiments measuring adiabatic effectiveness were conducted to investigate the effects of turbulated perpendicular cross-flow on a row of 45° compound angle cylindrical film cooling holes for a total of eight internal rib configurations. The ribs were angled to the direction of prevailing internal cross-flow at two different angles: 45° or 135°. The ribs were also positioned at two different span-wise locations relative to the cooling holes: in the middle of the cooling hole pitch, and slightly intersecting the holes. Experiments were conducted at a density ratio of DR = 1.5 for a range of blowing ratios including M = 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. This study demonstrates that peak effectiveness can be attained through the optimization of cross-flow direction relative to the compound angle direction and rib configuration, verifying the importance of hole inlet conditions in film cooling experiments. It was found that ribs tend to reduce adiabatic effectiveness relative to a baseline, smooth-walled configuration. Rib configurations that directed the internal coolant forward in the direction of the mainstream resulted in higher peak adiabatic effectiveness. However, no other parameters could consistently be identified correlating to increased film cooling performance. It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for influencing performance, including internal local pressure caused by the ribs, the internal channel flow field, in-hole vortices, and jet exit velocity profiles. This study also attempted to replicate the possibility that film cooling holes may intersect ribs and found that a hole which partially intersects a rib still maintains moderate levels of effectiveness.

Effect of Coolant Density on Leading Edge Showerhead Film Cooling Using PSP Measurement Technique

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiou-Jiuan Li ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Pressure Sensitive ◽  
Cylindrical Holes ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle ◽  
Low Speed Wind Tunnel

The density ratio effect on leading edge showerhead film cooling has been studied experimentally using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) mass transfer analogy method. Leading edge model is a blunt body with a semi-cylinder and an after body. There are two designs: seven-row and three-row of film cooling holes for simulating vane and blade, respectively. The film holes are located at 0 (stagnation row), ±15, ±30, and ±45 deg for seven-row design, and at 0 and ±30 for three-row design. Four film holes configurations are used for both test designs: radial angle cylindrical holes, compound angle cylindrical holes, radial angle shaped holes, and compound angle shaped holes. Coolant to mainstream density ratio varies from DR = 1.0, 1.5, to 2.0 while blowing ratio varies from M = 0.5 to 2.1. Experiments were conducted in a low speed wind tunnel with Reynolds number 100,900 based on mainstream velocity and diameter of the cylinder. The mainstream turbulence intensity near leading edge model is about 7%. The results show the shaped holes have overall higher film cooling effectiveness than cylindrical holes, and radial angle holes are better than compound angle holes, particularly at higher blowing ratio. Larger density ratio makes more coolant attach to the surface and increases film protection for all cases. Radial angle shaped holes provides best film cooling at higher density ratio and blowing ratio for both designs.

The Effect of Internal Cross-Flow on the Adiabatic Effectiveness of Compound Angle Film Cooling Holes

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. McClintic ◽  
Sean R. Klavetter ◽  
Joshua B. Anderson ◽  
James R. Winka ◽  
David G. Bogard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Turbine Engines ◽  
Turbine Engine ◽  
Adiabatic Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

In gas turbine engines, film cooling holes are often fed by an internal cross-flow, with flow normal to the direction of the external flow around the airfoil. Many experimental studies have used a quiescent plenum to feed model film cooling holes and thus do not account for the effects of internal cross-flow. In this study, an experimental flat plate facility was constructed to study the effects of internal cross-flow on a row of cylindrical compound angle film cooling holes. Operating conditions were scaled, based on coolant hole Reynolds number and turbulence level, to match realistic turbine engine conditions. A cross-flow channel allowed for coolant to flow alternately in either direction perpendicular to the mainstream flow. Film cooling holes were operated at blowing ratios ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 at a density ratio of 1.5. There are relatively few studies available in literature that focus on the effects of cross-flow on film cooling performance, with no studies examining the effects of internal cross-flow on film cooling with round, compound angled holes. This study showed that significantly greater adiabatic effectiveness was achieved for cross-flow in the opposite direction of the span-wise direction of the coolant holes and provides possible explanations for this result.

Interaction of Flow and Film-Cooling Effectiveness Between Double-Jet Film-Cooling Holes With Various Spanwise Distances

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxu Yao ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Jiang Lei ◽  
Lesley M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Vortex Pair ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Two Jets ◽  
Compound Angle

The interaction of flow and film-cooling effectiveness between jets of double-jet film-cooling (DJFC) holes on a flat plate is studied experimentally. The time-averaged flow field in several axial positions (X/d = −2.0, 1.0, and 5.0) is obtained through a seven-hole probe. The downstream film-cooling effectiveness on the flat plate is measured by pressure sensitive paint (PSP). The inclination angle (θ) of all the holes is 35 deg, and the compound angle (β) is ±45 deg. Effects of the spanwise distance (p = 0, 0.5d, 1.0d, 1.5d, and 2.0d) between the two interacting jets of DJFC holes are studied, while the streamwise distance (s) is kept as 3d. The blowing ratio (M) varies as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The density ratio (DR) is maintained at 1.0. Results show that the interaction between the two jets of DJFC holes has different effects at different spanwise distances. For a small spanwise distance (p/d = 0), the interaction between the jets presents a pressing effect. The downstream jet is pressed down and kept attached to the surface by the upstream one. The effectiveness is not sensitive to blowing ratios. For mid-spanwise distances (p/d = 0.5 and 1.0), the antikidney vortex pair dominates the interaction and pushes both of the jets down, thus leading to better coolant coverage and higher effectiveness. As the spanwise distance becomes larger (p/d ≥ 1.5), the pressing effect almost disappears, and the antikidney vortex pair effect is weaker. The jets separate from each other and the coolant coverage decreases. At a higher blowing ratio, the interaction between the jets of DJFC holes happens later.

Interaction of Flow and Film-Cooling Effectiveness Between Double-Jet Film-Cooling Holes With Various Spanwise Distances

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxu Yao ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Jiang Lei ◽  
Lesley M. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Flat Plate ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Vortex Pair ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Two Jets ◽  
Compound Angle

The interaction of flow and film-cooling effectiveness between jets of double-jet film-cooling (DJFC) holes on a flat plate is studied experimentally. The time-averaged secondary flow field in several axial positions (X/d = −2.0, 1.0, and 5.0) is obtained through a seven-hole probe. The downstream film-cooling effectiveness on the flat plate is achieved by Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP). The inclination angle (θ) of all holes is 35°, and the compound angle (β) is ±45°. Effects of spanwise distance (p = 0, 0.5d, 1.0d, 1.5d, 2.0d) between the two interacting jets of DJFC holes are studied while streamwise distance (s) is kept as 3d. The blowing ratio (M) varies as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0. The density ratio (DR) is maintained at 1.0. Results show that the interaction between two jets of DJFC holes has different effects for different spanwise distance. For a small spanwise distance (p/d = 0), the interaction between jets presents a pressing effect. The downstream jet is pressed down and kept attached to the surface by the upstream one. The effectiveness is not sensitive to blowing ratios. For mid spanwise distances (p/d = 0.5 and 1.0), the anti-kidney vortex pair dominates the interaction, and pushes both of the jets down, thus leads to better coolant coverage and higher effectiveness. As spanwise distance becomes larger (p/d≥1.5), the pressing effect almost disappears, and the anti-kidney vortex pair effect is weaker. The jets separate from each other and the coolant coverage decreases. At higher blowing ratio, the interaction between the two jets of DJFC holes moves more downstream.

Effect of Coolant Density on Leading Edge Showerhead Film Cooling Using the Pressure Sensitive Paint Measurement Technique

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiou-Jiuan Li ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Pressure Sensitive Paint ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Pressure Sensitive ◽  
Cylindrical Holes ◽  
Film Cooling Holes ◽  
Compound Angle

The density ratio effect on leading edge showerhead film cooling has been studied experimentally using the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) mass transfer analogy method. The leading edge model is a blunt body with a semicylinder and an after body. There are two designs: seven-row and three-row of film cooling holes for simulating a vane and blade, respectively. The film holes are located at 0 (stagnation row), ±15, ±30, and ±45 deg for the seven-row design, and at 0 and ±30 for the three-row design. Four film hole configurations are used for both test designs: radial angle cylindrical holes, compound angle cylindrical holes, radial angle shaped holes, and compound angle shaped holes. The coolant to mainstream density ratio varies from DR = 1.0, 1.5, to 2.0 while the blowing ratio varies from M = 0.5 to 2.1. Experiments were conducted in a low speed wind tunnel with Reynolds number 100,900 based on mainstream velocity and diameter of the cylinder. The mainstream turbulence intensity near the leading edge model is about 7%. The results show the shaped holes have an overall higher film cooling effectiveness than the cylindrical holes, and the radial angle holes are better than the compound angle holes, particularly at a higher blowing ratio. A larger density ratio makes more coolant attach to the surface and increases film protection for all cases. Radial angle shaped holes provide the best film cooling at a higher density ratio and blowing ratio for both designs.

Assessment of a Double Hole Film Cooling Geometry Using S-PIV and PSP

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley M. Wright ◽  
Stephen T. McClain ◽  
Charles P. Brown ◽  
Weston V. Harmon
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Secondary Flows ◽  
Cylindrical Hole ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Hole Geometry ◽  
Compound Angle

A novel, double hole film cooling configuration is investigated as an alternative to traditional cylindrical and fanshaped, laidback holes. This experimental investigation utilizes a Stereo-Particle Image Velocimetry (S-PIV) to quantitatively assess the ability of the proposed, double hole geometry to weaken or mitigate the counter-rotating vortices formed within the jet structure. The three-dimensional flow field measurements are combined with surface film cooling effectiveness measurements obtained using Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP). The double hole geometry consists of two compound angle holes. The inclination of each hole is θ = 35°, and the compound angle of the holes is β = ± 45° (with the holes angled toward one another). The simple angle cylindrical and shaped holes both have an inclination angle of θ = 35°. The blowing ratio is varied from M = 0.5 to 1.5 for all three film cooling geometries while the density ratio is maintained at DR = 1.0. Time averaged velocity distributions are obtained for both the mainstream and coolant flows at five streamwise planes across the fluid domain (x/d = −4, 0, 1, 5, and 10). These transverse velocity distributions are combined with the detailed film cooling effectiveness distributions on the surface to evaluate the proposed double hole configuration (compared to the traditional hole designs). The fanshaped, laidback geometry effectively reduces the strength of the kidney-shaped vortices within the structure of the jet (over the entire range of blowing ratios considered). The three-dimensional velocity field measurements indicate the secondary flows formed from the double hole geometry strengthen in the plane perpendicular to the mainstream flow. At the exit of the double hole geometry, the streamwise momentum of the jets is reduced (compared to the single, cylindrical hole), and the geometry offers improved film cooling coverage. However, moving downstream in the steamwise direction, the two jets form a single jet, and the counter-rotating vortices are comparable to those formed within the jet from a single, cylindrical hole. These strong secondary flows lift the coolant off the surface, and the film cooling coverage offered by the double hole geometry is reduced.

Influence of Coolant Density on Turbine Platform Film-Cooling With Stator–Rotor Purge Flow and Compound-Angle Holes

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Liu ◽  
Shang-Feng Yang ◽  
Je-Chin Han
Keyword(s):  
Film Cooling ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Fundamental Parameters ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Purge Flow ◽  
Cylindrical Holes ◽  
Exit Mach Number ◽  
Compound Angle

A detailed parametric study of film-cooling effectiveness was carried out on a turbine blade platform. The platform was cooled by purge flow from a simulated stator–rotor seal combined with discrete hole film-cooling. The cylindrical holes and laidback fan-shaped holes were accessed in terms of film-cooling effectiveness. This paper focuses on the effect of coolant-to-mainstream density ratio on platform film-cooling (DR = 1 to 2). Other fundamental parameters were also examined in this study—a fixed purge flow of 0.5%, three discrete-hole film-cooling blowing ratios between 1.0 and 2.0, and two freestream turbulence intensities of 4.2% and 10.5%. Experiments were done in a five-blade linear cascade with inlet and exit Mach number of 0.27 and 0.44, respectively. Reynolds number of the mainstream flow was 750,000 and was based on the exit velocity and chord length of the blade. The measurement technique adopted was the conduction-free pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique. Results indicated that with the same density ratio, shaped holes present higher film-cooling effectiveness and wider film coverage than the cylindrical holes, particularly at higher blowing ratios. The optimum blowing ratio of 1.5 exists for the cylindrical holes, whereas the effectiveness for the shaped holes increases with an increase of blowing ratio. Results also indicate that the platform film-cooling effectiveness increases with density ratio but decreases with turbulence intensity.

Shock Wave - Film Cooling Interactions in Transonic Flows

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Ligrani ◽  
C. Saumweber ◽  
A. Schulz ◽  
S. Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Mach Number ◽  
Shock Waves ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Injection Velocity ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Mach Numbers ◽  
Density Ratios ◽  
Film Cooling Holes

Interactions between shock waves and film cooling are described as they affect magnitudes of local and spanwise-averaged adiabatic film cooling effectiveness distributions. A row of three cylindrical holes is employed. Spanwise spacing of holes is 4 diameters, and inclination angle is 30 degrees. Freestream Mach numbers of 0.8 and 1.10–1.12 are used, with coolant to freestream density ratios of 1.5–1.6. Shadowgraph images show different shock structures as the blowing ratio is changed, and as the condition employed for injection of film into the cooling holes is altered. Investigated are film plenum conditions, as well as perpendicular film injection cross-flow Mach numbers of 0.15, 0.3, and 0.6. Dramatic changes to local and spanwise-averaged adiabatic film effectiveness distributions are then observed as different shock wave structures develop in the immediate vicinity of the film-cooling holes. Variations are especially evident as the data obtained with a supersonic Mach number are compared to the data obtained with a freestream Mach number of 0.8. Local and spanwise-averaged effectiveness magnitudes are generally higher when shock waves are present when a film plenum condition (with zero cross-flow Mach number) is utilized. Effectiveness values measured with a supersonic approaching freestream and shock waves then decrease as the injection cross-flow Mach number increases. Such changes are due to altered flow separation regions in film holes, different injection velocity distributions at hole exits, and alterations of static pressures at film hole exits produced by different types of shock wave events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document