Experimental Investigation of the CHF Condition During Flow Boiling of Water in Microtubes

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand P. Roday ◽  
Michael K. Jensen
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Heat Transfer Process ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
C 50 ◽  
Different Diameters

The critical heat flux (CHF) condition sets an upper limit on the flow-boiling heat transfer process. With the growing demand for the use of two-phase flow in micro and nano-sized devices, there is a strong need to understand the CHF phenomenon in channels of such small dimensions. This study experimentally investigates the critical heat flux condition during flow boiling in a single stainless steel microtube of two different diameters—0.427mm, and 0.286 mm. Degassed water is the working fluid. The effects of various parameters—diameter, mass flux (350–1500 kg/m2s), inlet subcooling (2°C–50°C), and length-to-diameter ratio (75–200) on the CHF condition are studied for the exit condition being nearly atmospheric pressure. The CHF increases with an increase in mass flux. The effect of the inlet subcooling on the CHF condition is more complex. With a decreasing inlet subcooling, the CHF decreases until saturated liquid is reached; thereafter, the CHF increases with quality.

Effect of Inlet Restriction on Flow Boiling Heat Transfer in a Horizontal Microtube

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
YanFeng Fan ◽  
Ibrahim Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Low Mass

Flow boiling heat transfer in a horizontal microtube with inlet restriction (orifice) under uniform heating condition is experimentally investigated using FC-72 as working fluid. A stainless steel microtube with an inner diameter of 889 μm is selected as main microtube. Two microtubes with smaller diameters are assembled at the inlet of main microtube to achieve the restriction ratios of 50% and 20%. The experimental measurement is carried out at mass fluxes ranging from 160 to 870 kg/m2·s, heat fluxes varying from 6 to 170 kW/m2, inlet temperatures of 23 and 35 °C, and saturation pressures of 10 and 45 kPa. The effects of the orifices on two-phase pressure drop, critical heat flux (CHF), and flow boiling heat transfer coefficient are studied. The results show that the pressure drop caused by the orifice takes a considerable portion in the total pressure drop at low mass fluxes. This ratio decreases as the vapor quality or mass flux increases. The difference of normal critical heat flux in the microtubes with different orifice sizes is negligible. In the aspect of flow boiling heat transfer, the orifice is able to enhance the heat transfer at low mass flux and high saturation pressure, which indicates the contribution of orifice in the nucleate boiling dominated regime. However, the effect of orifice on flow boiling heat transfer is negligible in the forced convective boiling dominated regime.

scholarly journals Alumina Nanoparticle Pre-Coated Tubing Enhancing Subcooled Flow Boiling Critical Heat Flux

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bao Truong ◽  
Lin-wen Hu ◽  
Jacopo Buongiorno ◽  
Thomas McKrell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Subcooled Flow Boiling ◽  
Nanoparticle Deposition ◽  
Subcooled Flow ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer

Nanofluids are engineered colloidal dispersions of nano-sized particle in common base fluids. Previous pool boiling studies have shown that nanofluids can improve critical heat flux (CHF) up to 200% for pool boiling and up to 50% for subcooled flow boiling due to the boiling induced nanoparticle deposition on the heated surface. Motivated by the significant CHF enhancement of nanoparticle deposited surface, this study investigated experimentally the subcooled flow boiling heat transfer of pre-coated test sections in water. Using a separate coating loop, stainless steel test sections were treated via flow boiling of alumina nanofluids at constant heat flux and mass flow rate. The pre-coated test sections were then used in another loop to measure subcooled flow boiling heat transfer coefficient and CHF with water. The CHF values for the pre-coated tubing were found on average to be 28% higher than bare tubing at high mass flux G = 2500 kg/m2 s. However, no enhancement was found at lower mass flux G = 1500 kg/m2 s. The heat transfer coefficients did not differ much between experiments when the bare or coated tubes were used. SEM images of the test sections confirm the presence of a nanoparticle coating layer. The nanoparticle deposition is sporadic and no relationship between the coating pattern and the amount of CHF enhancement is observed.

The Effect of Inlet Orifice on Critical Heat Flux and Flow Boiling Heat Transfer in Single Horizontal Microtube

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Fan ◽  
Ibrahim Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Saturation Pressure ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer

Flow oscillation is a crucial issue for the development of flow boiling heat transfer in the applications. Inlet orifice has been proven be an option to eliminate the oscillation. However, the effects of inlet orifice on critical heat flux and flow boiling heat transfer coefficient are lack of study. In this work, the effects of inlet restriction on critical heat flux and heat transfer coefficient in single horizontal microtube under uniform heating condition is experimentally investigated using FC-72 as working fluid. A stainless steel microtube with an inner diameter of 889 μm is selected as main microtube. Two smaller microtubes are assembled at the inlet of main microtube to achieve the restriction configurations of 50% and 20% area ratios. The experimental measurement is carried out at mass fluxes ranging from 160–870 kg/m2·s and heat fluxes varying from 6–170 kW/m2. Two saturation pressures, 10 and 45 kPa, are tested. The experimental results of critical heat flux and two phase heat transfer coefficient obtained in the microtube without orifice are compared with the existing correlations. The addition of an orifice does not enhance the normal critical heat flux but increases the premature critical heat flux. In aspect of heat transfer, the orifice shows improvement on heat transfer coefficient at low mass flux and high saturation pressure.

Experimental Study on the Critical Heat Flux of Nanofluid Flow Boiling Under Different Conditions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
K. H. Deng ◽  
J. M. Wu ◽  
N. N. Yue ◽  
Y. F. Zan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Heating Surface ◽  
Vertical Tube ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Nanofluid Flow ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Heat Transfer System

Nanofluid has been attracted great attention since it was proposed as a preeminent working fluid. Flow boiling is familiar in heat transfer system and the critical heat flux is a key parameter for the design of thermal hydraulic. In present work, the critical heat flux of nanofluid flow boiling is experimentally investigated in a vertical tube with the consideration of outlet pressure, mass flux, inlet subcooling, heating length and diameter. The results indicate that the critical heat flux of nanofluid flow boiling is enhanced compared with base fluid and the increasing radio is increased with increasing the mass flux, diameter and pressure, and with decreasing the heating length. In addition, the inlet subcooling and concentrations (0.1vol.%, 0.5vol.%) have almost no significant influence. Furthermore, a new mechanism for the enhancement of nanofluid flow boiling critical heat flux was proposed by the SEM images of nanopariticle deposition on the heating surface.

Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Minichannel Up to Dryout Condition

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashid Ali ◽  
Bjo¨rn Palm ◽  
Mohammad H. Maqbool
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

In this paper the experimental flow boiling heat transfer results of a minichannel are presented. A series of experiments was conducted to measure the heat transfer coefficients in a minichannel made of stainless steel (AISI 316) having an internal diameter of 1.7mm and a uniformly heated length of 220mm. R134a was used as working fluid and experiments were performed at two different system pressures corresponding to saturation temperatures of 27 °C and 32 °C. Mass flux was varied from 50 kg/m2 s to 600 kg/m2 s and heat flux ranged from 2kW/m2 to 156kW/m2. The test section was heated directly using a DC power supply. The direct heating of the channel ensured uniform heating and heating was continued until dry out was reached. The experimental results show that the heat transfer coefficient increases with imposed wall heat flux while mass flux and vapour quality have no considerable effect. Increasing the system pressure slightly enhances the heat transfer coefficient. The heat transfer coefficient is reduced as dryout is reached. It is observed that dryout phenomenon is accompanied with fluctuations and a larger standard deviation in outer wall temperatures.

Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Minichannel up to Dryout Condition

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashid Ali ◽  
Björn Palm ◽  
Mohammad H. Maqbool
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

In this paper, the experimental flow boiling heat transfer results of a minichannel are presented. A series of experiments was conducted to measure the heat transfer coefficients in a minichannel made of stainless steel (AISI 316) having an internal diameter of 1.70 mm and a uniformly heated length of 220 mm. R134a was used as a working fluid, and experiments were performed at two different system pressures corresponding to saturation temperatures of 27°C and 32°C. Mass flux was varied from 50 kg/m2 s to 600 kg/m2 s, and heat flux ranged from 2 kW/m2 to 156 kW/m2. The test section was heated directly using a dc power supply. The direct heating of the channel ensured uniform heating, which was continued until dryout was reached. The experimental results show that the heat transfer coefficient increases with imposed wall heat flux, while mass flux and vapor quality have no considerable effect. Increasing the system pressure slightly enhances the heat transfer coefficient. The heat transfer coefficient is reduced as dryout is reached. It is observed that the dryout phenomenon is accompanied with fluctuations and a larger standard deviation in outer wall temperatures.

Comparison of Critical Heat Flux for R-134a Flow Boiling in a Horizontal Straight Tube and a Helically-Coiled Tube

2012 ◽  
Vol 588-589 ◽  
pp. 1813-1816
Author(s):  
Lu Zhi Tan ◽  
Ji Tian Han ◽  
Chang Nian Chen ◽  
Peng Cheng Dou
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Straight Tube ◽  
Coiled Tube ◽  
Helically Coiled Tube ◽  
R 134A

Experimental studies on critical heat flux (CHF) have been conducted in a uniformly heated horizontal straight tube and helically-coiled tube respectively with R-134a as the working fluid. The helically-coiled tube has the same heated length and inner diameter with the straight tube and experiments were performed under the following conditions: pressure from 0.4 to 2.5 MPa, mass flux values from 80 to 1500 kg m-2 s-1, inlet quality from -0.23 to 0.28 and critical quality from 0.65 to 0.86. The CHF data of the helically-coiled tube have been compared with that of the straight tube. The results show that the helically-coiled tube gets significant improvement in the CHF values vs. the straight tube under the same conditions and the degree of improvement depends on the mass flux, system pressure, inlet quality and critical quality.

scholarly journals Effect of Nanofluids on the Enhancement of Boiling Heat Transfer: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-283
Author(s):  
Md. Osman Ali ◽  
Mohammad Zoynal Abedin ◽  
Md. Dulal Ali ◽  
Mohammad Rasel Rasel
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Enhancement Of Heat Transfer ◽  
Passive Techniques

Boiling heat transfer can play a vital role in the two-phase flow applications. The analysis of the boiling hat transfer enhancement is of importance in such applications and the enhancement can be mostly conducted by using various active and passive techniques. One type of passive techniques is the enhancement of heat transfer by nanofluids. This article presents an extensive review on the effect of different nanofluids on the enhancement of heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and critical heat flux (CHF) for both pool as well as flow boiling. Nanoparticles addition to a working fluid is done arbitrarily to improve the thermophysical properties which in turn improves heat transfer rate. Numerous works have been done in the studies on nanofluid boiling. Among various nanoparticles, the most frequently used nanoparticles are Al2O3 and TiO2. In the case of binary nanoparticles, the most commonly used combination is Al2O3 and TiO2. After reviewing the relevant literatures, it is found that for pool boiling, the maximum HTC is increased to 138% for TiO2 nanoparticles and the maximum CHF is increased to 274.2% for MWCNTs. Conversely, in flow boiling the maximum HTC is increased to 126% for ZnO nanoparticles and the maximum CHF increased to as 100% for GO nanoparticles. In addition, when two or more nanoparticles in succession or binary nanofluids are used the CHF in pool boiling increased up to 100% for Al2O3 and TiO2 as well as the CHF in flow boiling increased up to 100% for Al2O3, ZnO, and Diamond. Though the information of the coefficient of heat transfer and the critical heat flux varied for different nanofluids and vary from experiment to experiment for each of the nanofluids. This variation happens because the coefficient of heat transfer and the critical heat flux in boiling is dependent upon several factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document