Statistical Safe Braking Analysis

Author(s):  
David F. Thurston

The main objective in optimizing train control is to eliminate the waist associated with classical design where train separation is determined through the use of “worst case” assumptions that are invariant to the system. In fact, the worst case approach has been in place since the beginning of train control systems. Worst case takes the most conservative approach to the determination of train stopping distance, which is the basis for design of virtually all train control. This leads to stopping distances that could be far more that actually required under the circumstances at the time the train is attempting to brake. Modern train control systems are designed to separate trains in order to provide safety of operation while increasing throughput. Calculations for the minimum distance that separates trains have traditionally been based on the sum of a series of worst case scenarios. The implication was that no train could ever exceed this distance in stopping. This distance is called Safe Braking Distance (SBD). SBD has always been calculated by static parameters that were assumed to be invariant. This is, however, not the case. Parameters such as adhesion, acceleration, weight, and reaction vary over time, location or velocity. Since the worst case is always used in the calculation, inefficiencies result in this methodology which causes degradation in capacity and throughput. This is also true when mixed traffic with different stopping characteristics are present at the same time. The classic theory in train control utilizes a SBD model to describe the characteristics of a stopping train. Since knowledge of these conditions is not known, poor conditions are assumed. A new concept in train control utilizes statistical analysis and estimation to provide knowledge of the conditions. Trains operating along the line utilize these techniques to understand inputs into their SBD calculation. This provides for a SBD calculation on board the train that is the shortest possible that maintains the required level of safety. The new SBD is a prime determinant in systems capacity. Therefore by optimizing SBD as describes, system capacity is also optimized. The system continuously adjusts to changing conditions.

Author(s):  
David F. Thurston

The main objective in optimizing train control is to eliminate the waste associated with the use of “worst case” assumptions to calculate Safe Braking Distances (SBD). Worst case takes the most conservative approach to the determination of train stopping distance in order to provide adequate stopping distance under virtually all conditions. This leads to stopping distances that could be far more than actually required under the circumstances at the time the train is attempting to brake. Several factors are considered in SBD; however one variable that influences a great portion of this distance is adhesion. This paper investigates adhesion to illustrate this influence on SBD and uses empirical data from Light Rail Systems with various test conditions. The interaction of the train control and other vehicle borne systems with SBD calculation will also be investigated including slip/slide control and brake assurance.


Author(s):  
David F. Thurston

IEEE 1698, Guidelines for Safe Braking Distance Calculations - 2009 brakes down the determination of stopping distance for train control system into separate independent events. One of the most misunderstood portions of the model is Parts I and H (train deceleration). This paper looks at the reasoning behind the unique properties of these parts, how they are related as well as how to calculate them. Examples of applications will be shown and optimization techniques will be investigated to shorten the required safe stopping distance and increase capacity.


Author(s):  
D. F. Thurston

Train control systems use a Safe Braking Distance (SBD) to determine the appropriate length to separate trains to avoid collisions. The same properties that allow trains to propel themselves with great efficiency also prevent them from stopping suddenly. Once the SBD is determined, it can be applied to the signal system design by creating “signal blocks” that are used to determine the location of signal equipment along the track. In its simplest form, each signal block provides sufficient distance to stop the train traveling at the maximum authorized speed. More advanced train control systems utilize other means of train detection such as global positioning satellites, or track mounted transponders. Regardless of the train control technology used, the methods of determining SBD remain the same. Positive Train Control (PTC) type systems are being developed for deployment throughout the United States and are required on all passenger lines, including High Speed Rail. However all of these methodologies are based on traditional worst case scenarios. With PTC required to be deployed before the 2015 time limit, freight carriers are working on new braking algorithms that involve specific inputs such as speed, train weight and alignment. This is called “Adaptive Braking” in that it calculates a different solution based on the data on hand [22]. Reports on this development detail purely reactive methodology. Reactive methods simply imply that conditions for the calculation are based on information that is in or before real time. It is proposed to utilize a proactive approach in determining SBD to monitor adhesion conditions in advance of the train to optimize SBD and capacity.


Author(s):  
�. ������� ◽  
◽  
�. ʳ�� ◽  
�. ������� ◽  
�. ������� ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 650 ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerij I. Goncharov ◽  
Vadim A. Onufriev ◽  
Ilya O. Ilyin

Authors review methods of determining a plant’s mathematical model. Then, they show a numerical method of pulse automatic control systems’ (ACS) identification, focused on computer technology, the interpolation procedure and iterative methods of approximation to the desired solution. The basis of the approach is the method of inverse problems of dynamics and real interpolation method for calculating the linearized dynamical systems. An algorithm and the mobile device designed for the identification of facilities management in operational conditions are proposed. There is results’ application in the conclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document