Online Quality Monitoring of Plastic Parts Using Real-Time Data From an Injection Molding Machine

Author(s):  
Jonathan Loftis ◽  
Saeed Farahani ◽  
Srikanth Pilla

Abstract Every day-increasing connectivity and access to data can provide valuable insight to the plastics industry. While the amount of accessible data has been increasing, the means to process and store it efficiently while squeezing valuable process information out of it has not been prioritized. The increase in connectivity has led to much of this data being stored and used in cloud computing systems which can be both monetarily and computationally expensive. Motivated by this fact, the feasibility of using real-time data directly captured from injection molding machine is investigated in terms of their capabilities for online quality monitoring. Using the built-in sensors that are usually existed in the standard injection molding machines (barrel pressure, screw position, and clamp force) and a dimensional reduction method, models are derived to predict quality of injection molded parts (Weight, Thickness, and Diameter). The developed models show high predictive capability with R2 values ranging from 0.89–0.97. Moreover, the combination of the proposed feature extraction method and implementation of Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS) demonstrates that most of the computing for automatic quality control can be done on local edge computing hardware with a significantly summarized data, and only control commands need to be sent through the cloud.

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 1107-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi ◽  
Willie Cade ◽  
Sara Behdad

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjit Roy ◽  
Saiyid Z. Kamal ◽  
Richard Frazier ◽  
Ross Bruns ◽  
Yahia Ait Hamlat

Abstract Frequent, reliable, and repeatable measurements are key to the evolution of digitization of drilling information and drilling automation. While advances have been made in automating the drilling process and the use of sophisticated engineering models, machine learning techniques to optimize the process, and lack of real-time data on drilling fluid properties has long been recognized as a limiting factor. Drilling fluids play a significant function in ensuring quality well construction and completion, and in-time measurements of relevant fluid properties are key to automation and enhancing decision making that directly impacts well operations. This paper discusses the development and application of a suite of automated fluid measurement devices that collect key fluid properties used to monitor fluid performance and drive engineering analyses without human involvement. The deployed skid-mounted devices continually and reliably measure properties such as mud weight, apparent viscosity, rheology profiles, temperatures, and emulsion stability to provide valuable insight on the current state of the fluid. Real-time data is shared with relevant rig and office- based personnel to enable process monitoring and trigger operational changes. It feeds into real-time engineering analyses tools and models to monitor performance and provides instantaneous feedback on downhole fluid behavior and impact on drilling performance based on current drilling and drilling fluid property data. Equipment reliability has been documented and demonstrated on over 30 wells and more than 400 thousand ft of lateral sections in unconventional shale drilling in the US. We will share our experience with measurement, data quality and reliability. We will also share aspects of integrating various data components at disparate time intervals into real-time engineering analyses to show how real-time measurements improve the prediction of well and wellbore integrity in ongoing drilling operations. In addition, we will discuss lessons learned from our experience, further enhancements to broaden the scope, and the integration with operators, service companies and other original equipment manufacturer in the domain to support and enhance the digital drilling ecosystem.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1004-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwaseop Lee ◽  
Kwangyeol Ryu ◽  
Youngju Cho

Mechatronics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1259-1269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Miller ◽  
Bao Mi ◽  
Akio Kita ◽  
I.Charles Ume

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1470-1473
Author(s):  
Zong HUANG ◽  
Xiao-long ZHANG ◽  
Xiao-yong BIAN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document