Progress Towards the Revision of BS 7910

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Hadley
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Assessment Procedures ◽  
Industry Sectors ◽  
First Time ◽  
Non Destructive

BS 7910, the UK procedure for the assessment of flaws in metallic structures, is being revised with a view to publication in 2012. Like the existing procedure, the new procedure will address all major failure/damage mechanisms, namely fracture, fatigue, creep and corrosion, and is intended to be used across a range of industry sectors and component types. There are several major proposed changes, which draw mainly on the existing BS 7910 procedures, the UK nuclear industry’s R6 document and the European FITNET procedure. The most far-reaching changes are in Section 7 (fracture) and related annexes. Here, the modifications include: • a re-structuring of the fracture assessment procedures from their present form (Levels 1–3) to a new hierarchy based on Options 1–3, which are more compatible with the current R6 and FITNET approaches, • revised treatment of flaw interaction, • a new annex (Annex N) permitting analysis under conditions of reduced crack tip constraint, • a new annex (I) addressing analysis of weld strength mismatch, • a revised residual stress compendium (Annex Q). As part of the revision, all annexes will be reviewed and edited where necessary, and a new annex on non-destructive examination (NDE) will be included for the first time. In view of the fact that many of the major changes concern the fracture assessment clauses, this paper presents a case study based on the analysis of a fully-circumferential flaw in a pipeline girth weld. The basic assessment Options (1 and 2) given in the new procedure are used to analyse the flaw, and three more advanced techniques (constraint-based assessment, assessment using an idealised residual stress distribution and analysis based on weld strength mismatch) are also applied.

The Future of the BS 7910 Flaw Assessment Procedures

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Hadley ◽  
Bob Ainsworth ◽  
Peter Budden ◽  
John Sharples
Keyword(s):  
Weld Strength ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
Damage And Failure ◽  
Reference Stress ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Assessment Procedures ◽  
Industry Sectors

BS 7910, the UK procedure for the assessment of flaws in metallic structures, was first published some 30 years ago in the form of a fracture/fatigue assessment procedure, PD6493. Since then it has been regularly maintained and expanded, taking in elements of other publications such as the UK power industry’s ‘R6’ procedure (in particular the Failure Assessment Diagram or FAD approach), the creep assessment procedure PD6539 and the UK gas transmission industry’s approach to corrosion assessment of locally thinned areas in pipelines. Work is currently underway to prepare another major revision, this time incorporating many elements of the European flaw assessment procedure FITNET. Like its predecessor, the new BS 7910 is intended for use by a range of industry sectors for virtually any type of metallic structure or component. The procedures will cover damage and failure by fatigue crack growth, fracture, creep and corrosion, including Environmentally Assisted Corrosion. The objective in revising the procedures is to support the use of more advanced assessment methods, whilst preserving compatibility with previous editions of BS 7910 and retaining methods for preliminary analyses based on simple, conservative inputs. Features of the new BS 7910 will include adoption of new advanced fracture assessment procedures (taking account of crack tip constraint and weld strength mismatch where appropriate), revision of the residual stress annex, preparation of a new annex covering guidance on NDE, an enhanced library of K-solutions and reference stress solutions and greater compatibility with procedures such as R6 and FITNET.

BS 7910: History and Future Developments

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Hadley
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
History Of ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Offshore Industry ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Assessment Procedures

BS 7910, the UK procedure for the assessment of flaws in metallic structures, was first published almost 30 years ago in the form of a fracture/fatigue assessment procedure, PD6493. It provided the basis for analysing fabrication flaws and the need for repair in a rational fashion, rather than relying on long-established (and essentially arbitrary) workmanship rules. The UK offshore industry in particular embraced this new approach to flaw assessment, which is now widely recognised by safety authorities and specifically referred to in certain design codes, including codes for pressure equipment. Since its first publication in 1980, PD6493/BS 7910 has been regularly maintained and expanded, taking in elements of other publications such as the UK power industry’s fracture assessment procedure R6 (in particular the Failure Assessment Diagram approach), the creep assessment procedure PD6539 and the gas transmission industry’s approach to assessment of locally thinned areas in pipelines. The FITNET European thematic network, run between 2002 and 2006, has further advanced the state of the art, bringing in assessment methods from SINTAP (an earlier European research project), R6, R5 and elsewhere. In particular, the FITNET fracture assessment methods represent considerable advances over the current BS 7910 methods; for example, weld strength mismatch can be explicitly analysed by using FITNET Option 2, and crack tip constraint through Option 5. Corrosion assessment methods in FITNET are also more versatile than those of BS 7910, and now include methods for vessels and elbows as well as for pipelines. In view of these recent advances, the BS 7910 committee has decided to incorporate many elements of the FITNET procedure into the next edition of BS 7910, to be published c2012. This paper summarises the history of the development of BS 7910, its relationship with other flaw assessment procedures (in particular FITNET and R6) and its future.

Optimising Fracture Assessment of Welded Structures Using BS 7910, R6 and FEA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Hadley ◽  
Tyler London
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Welding Residual Stress ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Materials Testing ◽  
Welded Structures ◽  
Analytical Formulae ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint ◽  
Assessment Procedures

Abstract The fracture clauses of BS 7910 and R6 present a hierarchy of assessment methods. Depending on the data available, the user may adopt the simplest approach (Option 1), or the higher Options (2 & 3), allowing increasing accuracy and decreasing conservatism. Additional assessment procedures are available via the Annexes of BS 7910 and via Chapter III of R6, which address the inclusion of welding residual stress, crack tip constraint, weld strength mismatch and warm prestress. This paper illustrates the application of both basic and advanced fracture assessment procedures to a set of welded wide plate test data. The tests featured extensive materials testing, along with detailed characterisation of welding residual stress both in the as-welded condition and after a warm prestress treatment. The study shows how the accuracy of the assessment increases as the more advanced assessment methods are employed. A tailored assessment of the uniaxial tests using elastic-plastic FEA was also carried out, allowing a comparison between the analytical formulae given in BS 7910/R6, numerical analysis and experimental results.

Validation of the European FITNET Fitness-for-Service Fracture Assessment Procedure

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Hadley ◽  
Liwu Wei
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Direct Calculation ◽  
Weld Strength ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Fracture Tests ◽  
The Many ◽  
Crack Tip Constraint ◽  
Assessment Procedures

The new European fitness-for-service procedure FITNET includes a hierarchy of different approaches for fracture assessment, designated Option 0 to Option 5. The choice of Option depends on the information available to the user, and can include direct calculation of crack driving force by FEA, allowance for weld strength mismatch and allowance for crack-tip constraint. The fracture assessment procedures have been extensively validated by analysing the results of large-scale fracture tests and engineering failures in accordance with the procedure, and comparing actual with predicted behaviour. This paper presents a selection of the many hundreds of analyses carried out, with particular emphasis on the more advanced Options incorporating weld strength mismatch and crack-tip constraint. Failure of the testpieces was correctly predicted by the FITNET procedure in all cases (ie, the analysis point corresponding to failure of the specimen lay outside the failure analysis line of the FAD). The safety factor associated with the analysis is, however, shown to decrease as the more advanced Options are invoked, ie the analysis becomes more accurate and less conservative, as intended.

scholarly journals Identification of pigments in artworks by inverse tangent derivative of spectrum and a new filtering method

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fazlali ◽  
S. Gorji Kandi
Keyword(s):  
Reflectance Spectrum ◽  
Practical Method ◽  
Chemical Methods ◽  
Munk Function ◽  
Absorption Of Light ◽  
Spectrophotometric Data ◽  
First Time ◽  
Non Destructive ◽  
Derivatives Of

Abstract Employing an economical and non-destructive method for identifying pigments utilized in artworks is a significant aspect for preserving their antiquity value. One of the non-destructive methods for this purpose is spectrophotometry, which is based on the selected absorption of light. Mathematical descriptive methods such as derivatives of the reflectance spectrum, the Kubelka–Munk function and logarithm have been employed for the characterization of the peak features corresponding to the spectrophotometric data. In the present study, the mentioned mathematical descriptive methods were investigated with the aim to characterize the constituents of an Iranian artwork but were not efficient for the samples. Therefore, inverse tangent derivative equation was developed on spectral data for the first time, providing considerable details in the profile of reflectance curves. In the next part, to have a simpler and more practical method it was suggested to use filters made up of pure pigments. By using these filters and placing them on the samples, imaging was done. Then, images of samples with and without filter were evaluated and pure pigments were distinguished. The mentioned methods were also used to identify pigments in a modern Iranian painting specimen. The results confirmed these methods with reliable answers indicating that physical methods (alongside chemical methods) can also be effective in determining the types of pigments.

To bee or not to beet with neonicotinoids

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Lynda M. Warren
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Environmental Standards ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
Precautionary Approach ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Commercial Sugar ◽  
The Uk ◽  
First Time

In January 2021 the UK government granted an application for authorisation to use thiamethoxam, a neonicotinoid pesticide, to protect commercial sugar beet crops from attack by viruses transmitted by aphids. This was the first time such an authorisation had been granted in the United Kingdom (UK) and there were concerns that it signalled a weakening of environmental standards now that the UK was no longer part of the European Union. In fact, similar authorisations had been granted by several European Member States in the last 2 years, despite the ban on the use of neonicotinoids introduced in 2018. Nevertheless, the reasons for granting the authorisation do suggest that the balance between adopting a precautionary approach to environmental protection and taking emergency action to protect economic interests may have shifted. It was acknowledged that the proposed mitigation to safeguard bees and other wildlife was not entirely satisfactory. In the end, due to unforeseen weather conditions it meant that the pesticide is not necessary, which in itself demonstrates that short-term emergency measures are unsuitable for dealing with the problem. If the sugar beet industry is to continue to prosper in the UK, it will need to be managed in a way that provides resistance to virus infection without the use of controversial chemicals.

Fracture Assessment of Flaws in Weldments using FITNET FFS Procedure: An Overview

2007 ◽  
Vol 345-346 ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Koçak ◽  
Stephen Webster ◽  
Isabel Hadley
Keyword(s):  
European Community ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Metallic Structures ◽  
Fracture Assessment ◽  
Basic Equations ◽  
Network Project

Recently a European community funded thematic network project (participation of 17 countries) FITNET (www.eurofitnet.org) has completed a new and unified engineering assessment procedure (FITNET FFS Procedure) of flaws in metallic structures and welds. This newly developed procedure (under CEN Workshop Agreement WA22) provides assessment rules for flaws or damage due to fracture, fatigue, creep and corrosion to demonstrate the structural integrity of the component. This paper gives an overview of the FITNET Fitness-for-Service (FFS) Procedure and specifically presents the features and basic equations of the Fracture Module. It also presents two brief examples for the validation of the procedure using laser welded specimens.

ICT and the Returns to Schooling and Job-Specific Experience

2007 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Kirby ◽  
Rebecca Riley
Keyword(s):  
Labour Force ◽  
Capital Intensity ◽  
Marginal Effect ◽  
Skill Levels ◽  
Returns To Schooling ◽  
Specific Experience ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Return To Schooling ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Industry Sectors

We use the United Kingdom Labour Force Survey to estimate the returns to schooling and job-specific experience in sixteen different industry sectors over the period 1994-2001. Next, assuming skill levels are fixed, we assess the marginal effect on these returns of the capital intensity of production and the ICT intensity of capital. Our results indicate that in the UK, over the period 1994-2001, the rising ICT intensity of capital was associated with a rise in the return to schooling, and a reduction in the return to job-specific experience.

scholarly journals Analyzing of Coatings on Steel - Reinforced Concrete Elements by Mobile NMR

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Orlowsky
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Building Site ◽  
Steel Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Mobile Nmr ◽  
The Individual ◽  
First Time ◽  
Concrete Elements ◽  
Non Destructive

Abstract A large number of infrastructural concrete buildings are protected against aggressive environments by coating systems. The functionality of these coating systems is mainly affected by the composition and thickness of the individual polymeric layers. For the first time ever, a mobile nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) sensor allows a non-destructive determination of these important parameters on the building site. However, before this technique can be used on steel-reinforced concrete elements, the potential effect of the reinforcement on the measurement, i.e. the NMR signal, needs to be studied. The results show a shift of the NMR profile as well as an increase of the signals amplitude in the case of the reinforced samples, while calculating the thickness of concrete coating leading to identical results.

First-time observation of Mastro Giorgio masterpieces by means of non-destructive techniques

2006 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Padeletti ◽  
G.M. Ingo ◽  
A. Bouquillon ◽  
S. Pages-Camagna ◽  
M. Aucouturier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Observation ◽  
First Time ◽  
Non Destructive ◽  
Non Destructive Techniques
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document