Cervical Posterior Fusion Rods Undergo Substantial Bending Deformations for Activities of Daily Living

Author(s):  
J. P. Rodriguez ◽  
J. Scheer ◽  
J. Eguizabal ◽  
J. M. Buckley ◽  
T. McClellan ◽  
...  

Cervical corpectomy is a procedure most commonly indicated for resection of metastatic disease in the vertebra, access to the spinal cord tumors and inflammatory or infectious lesions.[1] Posterior occipitocervical instrumentation with rods and lateral mass screws has been shown to be a rigid fixation technique in this region [2] and, small diameter rods are thought to be lighter weight, less prominent and less likely to be associated with screw pullout.[3] Still, deformity imposed upon small diameter rods, by the weight of the head, the cervical spine, and spinal ligaments has yet to be quantified. Anecdotal observations show that the rods lose their lordotic curvature and patients fuse in a kyphotic curve making daily living more difficult. The goal of this study is to examine the mechanical behavior of these rods in situ under physiologic loading conditions reflective of activies of daily living.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. E14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilson Z. Ray ◽  
Vijay M. Ravindra ◽  
Gregory F. Jost ◽  
Erica F. Bisson ◽  
Meic H. Schmidt

As health care reform continues to evolve, demonstrating the cost effectiveness of spinal fusion procedures will be of critical value. Posterior subaxial cervical fusion with lateral mass screw and rod instrumentation is a well-established fixation technique. Subaxial transarticular facet fixation is a lesser known fusion technique that has been shown to be biomechanically equivalent to lateral mass screws for short constructs. Although there has not been a widespread adoption of transarticular facet screws, the screws potentially represent a cost-effective alternative to lateral mass rod and screw constructs. In this review, the authors describe an institutional experience with the use of lateral mass screws and provide a theoretical cost comparison with the use of transarticular facet screws.



2006 ◽  
Vol 64 (3b) ◽  
pp. 762-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo D. Vilela ◽  
Charles Jermani ◽  
Bruno P. Braga

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with C1 lateral mass screws as part of a construct for C1-2 stabilization and report an alternate method of C1-C2 complex three-point fixation. METHOD: All patients that had at least one screw placed in the lateral mass of C1 as part of a construct for stabilization of the C1-C2 complex entered this study. In selected patients who had a higher chance of nonunion an alternate construct was used: transarticular C1-C2 screws combined with C1 lateral mass screws. RESULTS: Twenty-one C1 lateral mass screws were placed in 11 patients. In three patients the alternate construct was used. All patients had a demonstrable solid and stable fusion on follow-up. CONCLUSION: C1 lateral mass screws are safe and provide immediate stability. The use of C1-C2 transarticular screws combined with C1 lateral mass screws is a feasible and also an excellent alternative for a three-point fixation of the C1-C2 complex.



2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atif Haque ◽  
Angela V. Price ◽  
Frederick H. Sklar ◽  
Dale M. Swift ◽  
Bradley E. Weprin ◽  
...  

Object Rigid fixation of the upper cervical spine has become an established method of durable stabilization for a variety of craniocervical pathological entities in children. In children, specifically, the use of C1–2 transarticular screws has been proposed in recent literature to be the gold standard configuration for pathology involving these levels. The authors reviewed the use of rigid fixation techniques alternative to C1–2 transarticular screws in children. Factors evaluated included ease of placement, complications, and postoperative stability. Methods Seventeen patients, ranging in age from 3 to 17 years (mean 9.6 years), underwent screw fixation involving the atlas or axis for a multitude of pathologies, including os odontoideum, Down syndrome, congenital instability, iatrogenic instability, or posttraumatic instability. All patients had preoperative instability of the occipitocervical or atlantoaxial spine demonstrated on dynamic lateral cervical spine radiographs. All patients also underwent preoperative CT scanning and MR imaging to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of the selected hardware placement. Thirteen patients underwent C1–2 fusion, and 4 underwent occipitocervical fusion, all incorporating C-1 lateral mass screws, C-2 pars screws, and/or C-2 laminar screws within their constructs. Patients who underwent occipitocervical fusion had no instrumentation placed at C-1. One patient's construct included sublaminar wiring at C-2. All patients received autograft onlay either from from rib (in 15 patients), split-thickness skull (1 patient), or local bone harvested within the operative field (1 patient). Nine patients' constructs were supplemented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein at the discretion of the attending physician. Eight patients had surgical sacrifice of 1 or both C-2 nerve roots to better facilitate visualization of the C-1 lateral mass. One patient was placed in halo-vest orthosis postoperatively, while the rest were maintained in rigid collars. Results All 17 patients underwent immediate postoperative CT scanning to evaluate hardware placement. Follow-up was achieved in 16 cases, ranging from 2 to 39 months (mean 14 months), and repeated dynamic lateral cervical spine radiography was performed in these patients at the end of their follow-up period. Some, but not all patients, also underwent delayed postoperative CT scans, which were done at the discretion of the treating attending physician. No neurovascular injuries were encountered, no hardware revisions were required, and no infections were seen. No postoperative pain was seen in patients who underwent C-2 nerve root sacrifice. Stability was achieved in all patients postoperatively. In all patients who underwent delayed postoperative CT scanning, the presence of bridging bone was shown spanning the fused levels. Conclusions Screw fixation of the atlas using lateral mass screws, in conjunction with C-2 root sacrifice in selected cases, and of the axis using pars or laminar screws is a safe method for achieving rigid fixation of the upper cervical spine in the pediatric population.



2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risheng Xu ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt ◽  
Edward G. Sutter ◽  
Daniel M. Sciubba ◽  
Jean-Paul Wolinsky ◽  
...  

Object The aim of this study was to conduct the first in vitro biomechanical comparison of immediate and postcyclical rigidities of C-7 lateral mass versus C-7 pedicle screws in posterior C4–7 constructs. Methods Ten human cadaveric spines were treated with C4–6 lateral mass screw and C-7 lateral mass (5 specimens) versus pedicle (5 specimens) screw fixation. Spines were potted in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement and placed on a materials testing machine. Rotation about the axis of bending was measured using passive retroreflective markers and infrared motion capture cameras. The motion of C-4 relative to C-7 in flexion-extension and lateral bending was assessed uninstrumented, immediately after instrumentation, and following 40,000 cycles of 4 Nm of flexion-extension and lateral bending moments at 1 Hz. The effect of instrumentation and cyclical loading on rotational motion across C4–7 was analyzed for significance. Results Preinstrumented spines for the 2 cohorts were comparable in bone mineral density and range of motion in both flexion-extension (p = 0.33) and lateral bending (p = 0.16). Lateral mass and pedicle screw constructs significantly reduced motion during flexion-extension (11.3°–0.26° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.002; 10.51°–0.30° for pedicle screws, p = 0.008) and lateral bending (7.38°–0.27° for lateral mass screws, p = 0.003; 11.65°–0.49° for pedicle screws, p = 0.03). After cyclical loading in both cohorts, rotational motion over C4–7 was increased during flexion-extension (0.26°–0.68° for lateral mass screws; 0.30°–1.31° for pedicle screws) and lateral bending (0.27°–0.39° and 0.49°–0.80°, respectively), although the increase was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postcyclical flexion-extension (p = 0.20) and lateral bending (0.10) between lateral mass and pedicle screws. Conclusions Both C-7 lateral mass and C-7 pedicle screws allow equally rigid fixation of subaxial lateral mass constructs ending at C-7. Immediately and within a simulated 6-week postfixation period, C-7 lateral mass screws may be as effective as C-7 pedicle screws in biomechanically stabilizing long subaxial lateral mass constructs.



2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amory J. Fiore ◽  
Regis W. Haid ◽  
Gerald E. Rodts ◽  
Brian R. Subach ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
...  

Object A variety of techniques may be used to achieve fixation of the upper cervical spine. Transarticular atlantoaxial screws, posterior interspinous cable and graft constructs, and interlaminar clamps have been used effectively to achieve atlantoaxial fixation. Various anatomical factors, however, may preclude the successful application of these techniques. These factors include aberrant vertebral artery anatomy, irreducible atlantoaxial subluxation, exaggerated cervicothoracic kyphosis, and the absence of the osseous substrate for fixation. In these cases, an alternative method of fixation must be performed. The authors present an alternative method to achieve fixation of the atlas in which lateral mass screws can be applied to atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixation. Methods Between February 1998 and November 2001, eight patients who ranged in age from 16 to 74 years underwent posterior fixation for upper cervical instability. Diagnoses included C-2 metastastic disease in two patients, irreducible odontoid fractures in two patients, atlantoaxial subluxation in two patients, and transverse ligament synovial cyst in two patients. Various anatomical factors precluded transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation in seven patients. One patient with a highly unstable spine due to a C-2 metastasis and pathological fracture underwent occipitocervical fusion. Atlantocervical fixation was achieved in seven patients by using varying constructs incorporating C-1 lateral mass screws. Occipitocervical fixation was achieved in one patient by incorporating C-1 lateral mass screws as an additional fixation point. A total of 14 C-1 lateral mass screws were placed in eight patients. There were no intraoperative complications. In all patients rigid fixation was achieved as demonstrated on postoperative radiographs. One patient died on postoperative Day 9 of aspiration pneumonia. At a mean follow-up time of 7.4 months, rigid fixation was maintained in all patients. Conclusions Atlantal lateral mass screws can be used to provide a safe and efficacious means of achieving atlantoaxial fixation when anatomical constraints preclude the use of a more traditional procedure. Atlantal lateral mass screws may also be incorporated in occipitocervical constructs to provide additional fixation points which may prevent construct failure.



2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
pp. 328-335
Author(s):  
Forhad H. Chowdhury ◽  
Mohammod Raziul Haque ◽  
Maliha Hakim ◽  
Mohammod Shamsul Arifin ◽  
Soyed Ariful Islam

Objectives Accessory C1 and C2 facet joints are very rare. Only few cases were reported in the literature. We report a case of bilateral accessory facets in an adult with special attention to clinical, neuroradiological, as well as peroperative findings. Case report A 37-year-old male presented with progressive quadriparesis. Radiology revealed bilateral posterior accessory C1 and C2 facet joints compressing the spinal cord with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability. Both accessory C1 and C2 facets with the posterior arch of the C1 were removed. Lateral mass screws and plates fixation at the C1 and C2 level, as well as fusion, were performed. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well. Conclusion In accessory C1 and C2 facet joints, when symptomatic, neuroradiological findings can guide to the proper diagnosis, to pathological understanding, and, ultimately, to management strategy.



Neurosurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S1-118-S1-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian K. Kwon ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
Jonathan N. Grauer ◽  
John M. Beiner

Abstract IN THE SURGICAL management of cervical spondylosis, the application of rigid internal fixation can enhance the immediate stability of the cervical spine. The sophistication of such internal fixation systems and the indications for their use are continuously evolving. A sound understanding of regional anatomy, biomechanics, and kinematics within the cervical spine is essential for the safe and effective application of internal fixation. Numerous options currently exist for anterior cervical plating systems; some lock the screws to the plate rigidly (constrained), whereas others allow for some rotational or translational motion between the screw and plate (semiconstrained). The role of anterior fixation in single and multilevel fusions is still the subject of some controversy. Long anterior cervical reconstructions may require additional posterior fixation to reliably promote fusion. Rigid fixation in the posterior cervical spine can be achieved with lateral mass screws or pedicle screws. Although lateral mass screws provide excellent fixation within the subaxial cervical spine, the regional anatomy of C2 and C7 often make it difficult to place such screws, and pedicle screws at these levels are advocated. Pedicle screws achieve fixation into both the anterior and posterior column and are arguably the most stable form of rigid internal fixation within the cervical spine. Familiarity with these internal fixation techniques can be an extremely valuable tool for the spine surgeon managing these degenerative disorders of the cervical spine.



2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ONS95-ONS99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. O’Brien ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan ◽  
Lee H. Riley ◽  
Ian Suk ◽  
Jean-Paul Wolinsky

Abstract Objective: Spinal cord compression secondary to a subluxation of one vertebral body over another can be achieved with reduction of the translational deformity. Intraoperative reduction of C1–C2 subluxations can be technically challenging when one uses traditional techniques (e.g., wiring and transarticular screw fixation). The popularization of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws has allowed surgeons to achieve a more complex realignment at this region of the spine. Control of both C1 and C2 with independent fixation can be used to obtain reduction. In certain instances, placement of C2 pedicle screws is not possible. The use of C2 translaminar screws (if the C2 lamina is present and suitable) is an alternative method of fixation in C2 and can be used for intraoperative reduction. Clinical Presentation: A 15-year-old boy with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis presented with spinal cord compression secondary to a C1–C2 subluxation. The C2 pedicle anatomy precluded safe placement of C2 pedicle screws. An alternative method of fixation with the use of C2 translaminar screws and reduction was performed to obtain proper alignment and decompress the spinal cord. Technique: C1 lateral mass screws and C2 translaminar screws are inserted in the usual fashion. Two contoured rods, two rod holders, and two distractors, combined with C1 lateral mass screws and C2 translaminar screws, were used to achieve reduction. Concomitant distraction between the C2 translaminar screw head and the rod holder resulted in ventral translation of C2 on C1, decompressing the spinal cord. The reduction was maintained by tightening the C2 locking nut onto the rod. Conclusion: The use of C2 translaminar screws (if the C2 lamina is present and suitable) is an alternative method of fixation in C2. C1 lateral mass and C2 translaminar screw fixation provide a powerful means of reducing C1–C2 subluxations and maintaining alignment, achieving indirect decompression of the spinal cord.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document