Cost effectiveness of subaxial fusion—lateral mass screws versus transarticular facet screws

As health care reform continues to evolve, demonstrating the cost effectiveness of spinal fusion procedures will be of critical value. Posterior subaxial cervical fusion with lateral mass screw and rod instrumentation is a well-established fixation technique. Subaxial transarticular facet fixation is a lesser known fusion technique that has been shown to be biomechanically equivalent to lateral mass screws for short constructs. Although there has not been a widespread adoption of transarticular facet screws, the screws potentially represent a cost-effective alternative to lateral mass rod and screw constructs. In this review, the authors describe an institutional experience with the use of lateral mass screws and provide a theoretical cost comparison with the use of transarticular facet screws.

Download Full-text

Cost-effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus erlotinib plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.353 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 353-353 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽

Scott Whiting ◽

Gary Binder ◽

George Dranitsaris ◽

Victoria Manax

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Payer Perspective ◽

The Us ◽

Recent Phase ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

The Cost

353 Background: In a recent phase III trial nab-paclitaxel (albumin-bound paclitaxel) + gemcitabine (nab-P/G) demonstrated a 1.8 month, or 27%, improvement in median overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.72, P < 0.001) vs gemcitabine (G) in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). nab-P/G had higher 1 year OS (35% vs 22%) and improved PFS by 1.8 months (HR = 0.69, P < 0.01). nab-P/G is the first taxane based therapy to show a significant OS improvement in a phase III mPC trial. Erlotinib + gemcitabine (E/G) has also demonstrated activity in mPC, with a 0.3 month OS benefit vs G (HR = 0.82, P = 0.04), a 1 year OS of 23% vs 17%, and 0.2 months PFS benefit (HR = 0.77, P = 0.004) vs G. A cost-effectiveness analysis measuring the cost per life year (LY) gained for nab-P/G and E/G was conducted from the US payer perspective. Methods: Costs and clinical outcomes were evaluated fromnab-P/G vs G and E/G vs G trials of mPC. Health care resource use and the management of grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were collected from a large multisite US oncology clinic, expert opinion, and literature (2012 US dollars). Drug cost per cycle was multiplied by the median cycles delivered from the trials for nab-P/G and E/G. Results: Duration of therapy was 4 months for nab-P/G vs 3.9 months for E/G. Total cost for nab-P/G was $24,984 vs $23,044 for E/G, including drug, administration and AE management. AE costs were similar between the two therapies (Table). Differences of > 5% were noted in neutropenia (rates: nab-P/G = 33%; E/G = 24%), neuropathy (nab-P/G = 17%; E/G = 1%), and rash (nab-P/G = 0%; E/G = 6%). The net survival advantage for nab-P/G vs E/G was 1.5 incremental life months gained. Nab-P/G was cost-effective relative to E/G, at a cost of $15,522 per incremental life year gained. Conclusions: nab-P/G is a cost-effective alternative to E/G in mPC, bringing more months of OS at < $16,000 cost per incremental life year gained. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Efficient routes to land conservation given risk of covenant failure

10.7287/peerj.preprints.1033v1 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Richard Schuster ◽

Peter Arcese

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Private Land ◽

Legal Challenges ◽

Monitoring And Enforcement ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

The Cost ◽

Conservation Investment ◽

Term Monitoring

Conservation initiatives to protect valued species communities in human-dominated landscapes face challenges linked to their potential costs. Conservation covenants on private land may represent a cost-effective alternative to land purchase, although many questions on the long-term monitoring and enforcement costs of covenants and the risk of violation or legal challenges remain unquantified. We explore the cost-effectiveness of conservation covenants, defined here as the fraction of the high-biodiversity landscape potentially protected via investment in covenants versus land purchase. We show that covenant violation and dispute rates substantially affect the estimated long-term cost-effectiveness of a covenant versus land purchase strategy. Our results suggest the long-term cost-effectiveness of conservation covenants may outperform land purchase as a strategy to protect biodiversity as long as disputes and legal challenges are low, but point to a critical need for monitoring data to reduce uncertainty and maximize conservation investment cost-effectiveness.

Download Full-text

1604. Cost-Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Multi-Drug Resistant Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas in China

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1784 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S797-S798

Author(s):

Wesley Furnback ◽

YiXi Chen ◽

Peng Dong ◽

Bruce Wang ◽

Wajeeha Ansari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

High Dose ◽

Drug Resistant ◽

Double Blind ◽

Hospital Acquired Pneumonia ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

Resistance Rates ◽

The Cost ◽

Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background To estimate the cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multi-drug resistant enterobacteriaceae (MDRE) or MDR pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) in China. Methods A previously published patient-level simulation model was localized to China to estimate the cost-effectiveness of first-line CAZ-AVI compared to meropenem from a healthcare perspective. Patients flowed through the model which evaluates resistance status, response, and adverse events (AEs), which can all lead to a treatment switch. Second-line therapy of colistin plus high dose meropenem was used for both arms. Resistance rates were 0.7% (CAZ-AVI) and 7.6% (meropenem) for MDRE, and 10.7% (CAZ-AVI) and 35.5% (meropenem) for MDRPA. Effectiveness rates for CAZ-AVI and meropenem were based on a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. All cost data, including drugs, AEs, and hospitalization were localized to China. Utility values were based on response and sourced from the literature. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5% over the five year time horizon. Results At a cost-effectiveness threshold of three-times GDP per capita, CAZ-AVI was cost-effective compared to meropenem for HAP/VAP caused by both MDRE and MDRPA with ICERs of ¥147,500 and ¥30,496, respectively. Specifically, CAZ-AVI had ¥13,699 and 0.09 additional total costs and QALYs, respectively, within MDRE; ¥5,207 and 0.17 additional total costs and QALYs, respectively, within MDRPA. Length of stay was reduced by 0.65 days and 1.37 in the CAZ-AVI arms of the MDRE and MDRPA analyses, respectively. Conclusion CAZ-AVI is a cost-effective alternative to meropenem in the treatment of HAP/VAP caused by MDRE or MDRPA in China. Disclosures Wesley Furnback, BA, Pfizer (Consultant) YiXi Chen, MSc, Pfizer (Employee) Peng Dong, PhD, Pfizer (Employee) Bruce Wang, PhD, Pfizer (Consultant) Wajeeha Ansari, MSc, Pfizer (Employee) Claudie Charbonneau, PhD, Pfizer (Employee) Hengjing Dong, MD, Pfizer (Other Financial or Material Support, Honorarium)

Download Full-text

1-year cost-utility analysis of prostate artery embolization (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies ◽

10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000071 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. e000071

Author(s):

Nikisha Patel ◽

Nathan Yung ◽

Ganesh Vigneswaran ◽

Laure de Preux ◽

Drew Maclean ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Cost Utility ◽

Cost Utility Analysis ◽

Utility Analysis ◽

Artery Embolization ◽

Prostate Artery Embolization ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

The Cost

ObjectiveTo determine whether prostate artery embolization (PAE) is a cost-effective alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) after 1-year follow-up.Design, setting and main outcome measuresA retrospective cost-utility analysis over a 12-month time period was conducted to compare the two interventions from a National Health Service perspective. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from data collected during the observational UK Register of Prostate Embolisation (UK-ROPE) Study. Costs for both PAE and TURP were derived from University Hospital Southampton, a tertiary referral centre for BPH and the largest contributor to the UK-ROPE. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was derived from cost and QALY values associated with both interventions to assess the cost-effectiveness of PAE versus TURP. Further sensitivity analyses involved a decision tree model to account for the impact of patient-reported complications on the cost-effectiveness of the interventions.ResultsThe mean patient age for TURP (n=31) and PAE (n=133) was 69 and 65.6 years, respectively. In comparison to TURP, PAE was cheaper due to shorter patient stays and the lack of necessity for an operating theatre. Analysis revealed an ICER of £64 798.10 saved per QALY lost when comparing PAE to TURP after 1-year follow-up.ConclusionOur findings suggest that PAE is initially a cost-effective alternative to TURP for the management of BPH after 1-year follow-up. Due to a higher reintervention rate in the PAE group, this benefit may be lost in subsequent years.Trial registration numberNCT02434575.

Download Full-text

Efficient routes to land conservation given risk of covenant failure

10.7287/peerj.preprints.1033 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Richard Schuster ◽

Peter Arcese

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Private Land ◽

Legal Challenges ◽

Monitoring And Enforcement ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

The Cost ◽

Conservation Investment ◽

Term Monitoring

Download Full-text

Markov Models for Economic Evaluation in Osteoporosis Treatment

Mathematics ◽

10.3390/math9182331 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (18) ◽

pp. 2331

Author(s):

Marta Osca-Guadalajara ◽

Javier Díaz-Carnicero ◽

Silvia González-de-Julián ◽

David Vivas-Consuelo

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Age Of Onset ◽

Bone Fractures ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Osteoporosis Treatment ◽

Effective Alternative ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Life Years ◽

Cost Effective Alternative ◽

The Cost

Osteoporosis is frequent in elderly people, causing bone fractures and lowering their quality of life. The costs incurred by these fractures constitute a problem for public health. Markov chains were used to carry out an incremental cost-utility analysis of the four main drugs used in Spain to treat osteoporosis (alendronate, risedronate, denosumab and teriparatide). We considered 14 clinical transition states, from starting osteoporotic treatment at the age of 50 until death or the age of 100. Cost-effectiveness was measured by quality adjusted life years (QALYs). The values used in the Markov model were obtained from the literature. Teriparatide is the cost-effective alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fractures from the age of 50, establishing a payment threshold of 20,000 EUR/QALY. However, it is the most expensive therapy, not appearing cost-effective in cases that do not present fracture and in ages over 80 years with fracture. Alendronate and denosumab therapies are presented as cost-effective osteoporosis treatment alternatives depending on the age of onset and duration of treatment. From the perspective of cost-effectiveness, establishing a payment threshold of 20,000 EUR/QALY, teriparatide is the cost-effective alternative in patients with fracture from the age of 50 to 70 years old in Spain.

Download Full-text

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BCG Vaccination against Tuberculosis in Indonesia: A Model-Based Study

Vaccines ◽

10.3390/vaccines8040707 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (4) ◽

pp. 707

Author(s):

Afifah Machlaurin ◽

Franklin Christiaan Karel Dolk ◽

Didik Setiawan ◽

Tjipke Sytse van der Werf ◽

Maarten J. Postma

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Epidemiological Data ◽

Control Programme ◽

Detection Rates ◽

Middle Income ◽

Bcg Vaccination ◽

Life Years ◽

The Cost

Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG), the only available vaccine for tuberculosis (TB), has been applied for decades. The Indonesian government recently introduced a national TB disease control programme that includes several action plans, notably enhanced vaccination coverage, which can be strengthened through underpinning its favourable cost-effectiveness. We designed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of Indonesia’s current BCG vaccination programme. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated from the perspectives of both society and healthcare. The robustness of the analysis was confirmed through univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Using epidemiological data compiled for Indonesia, BCG vaccination at a price US$14 was estimated to be a cost-effective strategy in controlling TB disease. From societal and healthcare perspectives, ICERs were US$104 and US$112 per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. The results were robust for variations of most variables in the univariate analysis. Notably, the vaccine’s effectiveness regarding disease protection, vaccination costs, and case detection rates were key drivers for cost-effectiveness. The PSA results indicated that vaccination was cost-effective even at US$175 threshold in 95% of cases, approximating the monthly GDP per capita. Our findings suggest that this strategy was highly cost-effective and merits prioritization and extension within the national TB programme. Our results may be relevant for other high endemic low- and middle-income countries.

Download Full-text

Cost Effectiveness of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Canadian Respiratory Journal ◽

10.1155/1999/508741 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 332-335 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Jennifer A Crocket ◽

Eric YL Wong ◽

Dale C Lien ◽

Khanh Gia Nguyen ◽

Michelle R Chaput ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Diagnostic Procedures ◽

Needle Aspiration ◽

Benign Disease ◽

University Hospital ◽

High Yield ◽

Transbronchial Needle Aspiration ◽

Computed Tomographic ◽

The Cost

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the yield and cost effectiveness of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in the assessment of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy.DESIGN: Retrospective study.SETTING: A university hospital.POPULATION STUDIED: Ninety-six patients referred for bronchoscopy with computed tomographic evidence of significant mediastinal or hilar adenopathy.RESULTS: Ninety-nine patient records were reviewed. Three patients had two separate bronchoscopy procedures. TBNA was positive in 42 patients (44%) and negative in 54 patients. Of the 42 patients with a positive aspirate, 40 had malignant cytology and two had cells consistent with benign disease. The positive TBNA result altered management in 22 of 40 patients with malignant disease and one of two patients with benign disease, thereby avoiding further diagnostic procedures. The cost of these subsequent procedures was estimated at $27,335. No complications related to TBNA were documented.CONCLUSIONS: TBNA is a high-yield, safe and cost effective procedure for the diagnosis and staging of bronchogenic cancer.

Download Full-text

The cost-effectiveness of insulin analogs and regular insulin for diabetes control: a case study in Iran

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance ◽

10.1108/ijhcqa-02-2019-0042 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 33 (4/5) ◽

pp. 323-331

Author(s):

Mohsen pakdaman ◽

Raheleh akbari ◽

Hamid reza Dehghan ◽

Asra Asgharzadeh ◽

Mahdieh Namayandeh

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Regular Insulin ◽

Diabetes Control ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Insulin Analogs ◽

Content Type ◽

Patients With Diabetes ◽

The Government ◽

The Cost

PurposeFor years, traditional techniques have been used for diabetes treatment. There are two major types of insulin: insulin analogs and regular insulin. Insulin analogs are similar to regular insulin and lead to changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. The purpose of the present research was to determine the cost-effectiveness of insulin analogs versus regular insulin for diabetes control in Yazd Diabetes Center in 2017.Design/methodology/approachIn this descriptive–analytical research, the cost-effectiveness index was used to compare insulin analogs and regular insulin (pen/vial) for treatment of diabetes. Data were analyzed in the TreeAge Software and a decision tree was constructed. A 10% discount rate was used for ICER sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness was examined from a provider's perspective.FindingsQALY was calculated to be 0.2 for diabetic patients using insulin analogs and 0.05 for those using regular insulin. The average cost was $3.228 for analog users and $1.826 for regular insulin users. An ICER of $0.093506/QALY was obtained. The present findings suggest that insulin analogs are more cost-effective than regular insulin.Originality/valueThis study was conducted using a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate insulin analogs versus regular insulin in controlling diabetes. The results of study are helpful to the government to allocate more resources to apply the cost-effective method of the treatment and to protect patients with diabetes from the high cost of treatment.

Download Full-text

Screening for Melanoma by Primary Health Care Physicians: A Cost—Effectiveness Analysis

Journal of Medical Screening ◽

10.1177/096914139600300112 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 47-53 ◽

Cited By ~ 50

Author(s):

Afaf Girgis ◽

Philip Clarke ◽

Robert C Burton ◽

Rob W Sanson—Fisher

Keyword(s):

Cost Effectiveness ◽

Screening Programme ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Economic Assessment ◽

Screening Tests ◽

Family Practitioners ◽

Effectiveness Analysis ◽

The Cost ◽

Primary Health Care Physicians ◽

Melanoma Screening

Background and design— Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer in the world, and the incidence is estimated to be doubling every 10 years. Despite advances in the early detection and treatment of melanoma about 800 people still die nationally of the disease each year. A possible strategy for further reducing the mortality from melanoma is an organised programme of population screening for unsuspected lesions in asymptomatic people. Arguments against introducing melanoma screening have been based on cost and the lack of reliable data on the efficacy of any screening tests. To date, however, there has been no systematic economic assessment of the cost effectiveness of melanoma screening. The purpose of this research was to determine whether screening may be potentially cost effective and, therefore, warrants further investigation. A computer was used to simulate the effects of a hypothetical melanoma screening programme that was in operation for 20 years, using cohorts of Australians aged 50 at the start of the programme. Based on this simulation, cost—effectiveness estimates of melanoma screening were calculated. Results— Under the standard assumptions used in the model, and setting the sensitivity of the screening test (visual inspection of the skin) at 60%, cost effectiveness ranged from Aust$6853 per life year saved for men if screening was undertaken five yearly to $12137 if screening was two yearly. For women, it ranged from $11 102 for five yearly screening to $20 877 for two yearly screening. Conclusion— The analysis suggests that a melanoma screening programme could be cost effective, particularly if five yearly screening is implemented by family practitioners for men over the age of 50.

Download Full-text