scholarly journals Ultrasound based techniques and transient elastography may not be precise methods for the detection of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Jalli
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography

scholarly journals “SPLEEN STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS FOR NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES USING FIBROSCAN”

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Revathy Marimuthu Shanmugam ◽  
Vinay C ◽  
Sathya Gopalasamy ◽  
Chitra Shanmugam
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varix ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

BACKGROUND: Many noninvasive surrogate marker for Portal hypertension or for the presence or grade of esophageal varices were studied..Splenomegaly along with splenic congestion secondary to splenic hyperdynamic circulation is seen secondary to Portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients that can be quantified by elastography. AIM:The aim of this study was to investigate whether spleen stiffness, assessed by TE, useful tool for grading chronic liver diseases and to compare its performance in predicting the presence and size of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. METHODOLOGY:86 patients with cirrhosis and 80 controls underwent transient elastography of liver and spleen for the assessment of liver stiffness (LSM) and spleen stiffness (SSM) . Upper GI endoscopy done in all Cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Spleen stiffness showed higher values in liver cirrhosis patients as compared with controls: 58.2 kpa vs14.8 kpa (P < 0.0001) and also found to be significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared with varices and those without varices (69.01 vs 42.05 kpa, P < 0.0001). Liver stiffness was also found to be higher in cirrhotic patients with varices when compared to patients without varices (38.5vs 21.2 kpa). Using both liver and spleen stiffness measurement we can predicted the presence of esophageal varices correctly. CONCLUSION: Spleen stiffness can be assessed using transient elastography, higher value correlated well with liver cirrhosis and presence of esophageal varices although it couldn’t correlate with grade of Esophageal Varix. Combined assessment of spleen and liver stiffness had better prediction of presence of Esophageal Varix.

scholarly journals Assessment of Spleen Stiffness for Prediction of Varices in Patients with Hepatitis C Related Cirrhosis Using Transient Elastography

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Naglaa El-Toukhy Ramadan El-Toukhy ◽  
Sharaf Elsayed Ali Hassanien ◽  
Ramy A. Metwaly ◽  
Medhat A. Khalil ◽  
Badawy A. Abdulaziz
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Group I ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Background and Study Aims: Portal hypertension is one of the most important complications of liver cirrhosis. The prevalence of varices among cirrhotic patients is variable. Therefore, endoscopic screening of all patients with liver cirrhosis would result in a large number of unnecessary additional burdens to endoscopic units. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measured by transient elastography (Fibroscan) for prediction of the presence of varices in patients with hepatitis C related cirrhosis. Patients and Methods: The study was carried out on 100 patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis and were divided into 2 groups according to presence or absence of varices by Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy: Group I: patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis with varices; Group II: patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis without varices. Clinical and laboratory parameters, andominal ultrasonography, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and transient elastography to assess the liver and spleen stiffness were carried out to all studied persons. Results: Spleen stiffness had significant diagnostic value to differentiate between cirrhotic patients with varices and cirrhotic patients without varices , it had significant diagnostic value in presence of esophageal varices at cut-off (≥46.4 K Pascal) the sensitivity for detection of esophageal varices was 93%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 80%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%; accuracy was 95% and area under the curve was 0.98 denoting that spleen stiffness is a good predictor of esophageal varices. Conclusion: Spleen stiffness was considered as an excellent predictor of esophageal varices and better than liver stiffness in prediction of esophageal varices presence and had significant diagnostic value to differentiate between the patients with varices and patients without varices at cut off (≥46.4 K Pascal) and it may have a role in variceal grading.

scholarly journals Value of hepatic elastography and Doppler indexes for predictions of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Bintintan ◽  
Romeo Ioan Chira ◽  
Vasile Virgil Bintintan ◽  
Georgiana Nagy ◽  
Roberta Maria Manzat-Saplacan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Ultrasound Parameters

Aims: Non-invasive methods are required to diagnose presence and grading of esophageal varices in patients with he- patic cirrhosis and in this respect we have evaluated the role of transient elastography and abdominal ultrasound parameters. Material and methods: Cirrhotic patients were prospectively evaluated by transient elastography and Doppler ultrasound for diagnosis of presence and grading of esophageal varices, the results being compared with the findings of the esophagogas- troduodenoscopy. Results: Sixty patients with hepatic cirrhosis were analysed. The parameters that reached statistical signifi- cance for diagnosis of esophageal varices were: liver stiffness (LSM) > 15 kPa, hemodynamic liver index (PVr1) ≥ 0.66, portal vascular resistance (PVR) > 17.66 and splenoportal index (SPI) > 4.77. The only parameter that reached statistical power for the diagnosis of large esophageal varices was LSM at a cut-off value of 28.8 kPa. Conclusions: Assessment of LSM in patients with liver cirrhosis can predict both the presence of esophageal varices and of large esophageal varices. The PVr1, PVR and SPI Doppler indexes can be used to diagnose the presence of esophageal varices but have no role in the prediction of large esophageal varices. Further studies are required to confirm these results and offer a stronger clinical significance.

Transient Elastography Identifies the Risk of Esophageal Varices and Bleeding in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus–Related Liver Cirrhosis

2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Qingjing Zhu ◽  
Weijun Wang ◽  
Jinfang Zhao ◽  
Afnan Ahmed Mohamed AL-Asbahi ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
B Virus

Transient elastography to rule out esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy in HIV-infected individuals with liver cirrhosis

AIDS ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 1807-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria L. Montes Ramirez ◽  
Jose F. Pascual-Pareja ◽  
Matilde Sánchez-Conde ◽  
Jose I. Bernardino De la Serna ◽  
Francisco X. Zamora Vargas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy ◽  
Rule Out

Efficacy of transient elastography in screening for large esophageal varices in patients with suspicious or proven liver cirrhosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 430-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huay-Min WANG ◽  
Gin-Ho LO ◽  
Wen-Chi CHEN ◽  
Ping-I HSU ◽  
Hsien-Chung YU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography

scholarly journals A72 NON-INVASIVE PREDICTION OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES BY TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY AND PLATELET COUNT IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS B AND ADVANCED CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE: VALIDATION OF BAVENO VI AND EXPANDED BAVENO VI CRITERIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
A Zoughlami ◽  
J Serero ◽  
G Sebastiani ◽  
M Deschenes ◽  
P Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus

Abstract Background Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) are at higher risk of developing complications from portal hypertension, including esophageal varices (EV). Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria, based on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography combined with platelet count, have been proposed to avoid unnecessary esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening for large esophageal varices needing treatment (EVNT). This approach has not been validated in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, who have etiology-specific cut-off of LSM for liver fibrosis. Aims We aimed to validate the Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria for EVNT in HBV patients with cACLD. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of HBV patients who underwent LSM in 2014–2020. Inclusion criteria were: a) diagnosis of cACLD, defined as LSM &gt;9 kPa; b) availability of EGD and platelets within 1 year of LSM. Baveno VI (LSM &lt;20 kPa and platelets &gt;150,000) and expanded Baveno VI criteria (LSM &lt;25 kPa and platelets &gt;110,000) were tested for EGD sparing. Diagnostic performance of these criteria against gold standard (EGD) was computed and compared to patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) etiologies, where these criteria have been widely validated. In these patients, the threshold for cACLD definition was &gt;10 kPa. Results A total of 287 patients (mean age 56, 95% Child A) were included, comprising of 43 HBV (58% on antiviral therapy), 134 HCV and 110 NASH patients. The prevalence of any grade EV and EVNT was 25% and 8% in the whole cohort, with 19% and 5% in HBV patients, respectively. Table 1 reports diagnostic performance, spared EGD and missed EVNT according to non-invasive criteria and cACLD etiology. Both Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria performed well in patients with HBV-related cACLD. There was no significant difference on diagnostic performance of these non-invasive criteria across the cACLD etiologies. Conclusions These results support use of non-invasive criteria based on LSM and platelets to spare unnecessary EGD in patients with HBV and cACLD. Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria can improve resource utilization and avoid invasive testing in context of screening EGD for patients with HBV-related cACLD. Funding Agencies None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document