scholarly journals “SPLEEN STIFFNESS MEASUREMENT IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS FOR NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES USING FIBROSCAN”

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Revathy Marimuthu Shanmugam ◽  
Vinay C ◽  
Sathya Gopalasamy ◽  
Chitra Shanmugam
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varix ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

BACKGROUND: Many noninvasive surrogate marker for Portal hypertension or for the presence or grade of esophageal varices were studied..Splenomegaly along with splenic congestion secondary to splenic hyperdynamic circulation is seen secondary to Portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients that can be quantified by elastography. AIM:The aim of this study was to investigate whether spleen stiffness, assessed by TE, useful tool for grading chronic liver diseases and to compare its performance in predicting the presence and size of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. METHODOLOGY:86 patients with cirrhosis and 80 controls underwent transient elastography of liver and spleen for the assessment of liver stiffness (LSM) and spleen stiffness (SSM) . Upper GI endoscopy done in all Cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Spleen stiffness showed higher values in liver cirrhosis patients as compared with controls: 58.2 kpa vs14.8 kpa (P < 0.0001) and also found to be significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared with varices and those without varices (69.01 vs 42.05 kpa, P < 0.0001). Liver stiffness was also found to be higher in cirrhotic patients with varices when compared to patients without varices (38.5vs 21.2 kpa). Using both liver and spleen stiffness measurement we can predicted the presence of esophageal varices correctly. CONCLUSION: Spleen stiffness can be assessed using transient elastography, higher value correlated well with liver cirrhosis and presence of esophageal varices although it couldn’t correlate with grade of Esophageal Varix. Combined assessment of spleen and liver stiffness had better prediction of presence of Esophageal Varix.

scholarly journals Assessment of Spleen Stiffness for Prediction of Varices in Patients with Hepatitis C Related Cirrhosis Using Transient Elastography

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-18
Author(s):  
Naglaa El-Toukhy Ramadan El-Toukhy ◽  
Sharaf Elsayed Ali Hassanien ◽  
Ramy A. Metwaly ◽  
Medhat A. Khalil ◽  
Badawy A. Abdulaziz
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Group I ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients

Background and Study Aims: Portal hypertension is one of the most important complications of liver cirrhosis. The prevalence of varices among cirrhotic patients is variable. Therefore, endoscopic screening of all patients with liver cirrhosis would result in a large number of unnecessary additional burdens to endoscopic units. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measured by transient elastography (Fibroscan) for prediction of the presence of varices in patients with hepatitis C related cirrhosis. Patients and Methods: The study was carried out on 100 patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis and were divided into 2 groups according to presence or absence of varices by Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy: Group I: patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis with varices; Group II: patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis without varices. Clinical and laboratory parameters, andominal ultrasonography, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and transient elastography to assess the liver and spleen stiffness were carried out to all studied persons. Results: Spleen stiffness had significant diagnostic value to differentiate between cirrhotic patients with varices and cirrhotic patients without varices , it had significant diagnostic value in presence of esophageal varices at cut-off (≥46.4 K Pascal) the sensitivity for detection of esophageal varices was 93%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 80%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%; accuracy was 95% and area under the curve was 0.98 denoting that spleen stiffness is a good predictor of esophageal varices. Conclusion: Spleen stiffness was considered as an excellent predictor of esophageal varices and better than liver stiffness in prediction of esophageal varices presence and had significant diagnostic value to differentiate between the patients with varices and patients without varices at cut off (≥46.4 K Pascal) and it may have a role in variceal grading.

scholarly journals Value of hepatic elastography and Doppler indexes for predictions of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Bintintan ◽  
Romeo Ioan Chira ◽  
Vasile Virgil Bintintan ◽  
Georgiana Nagy ◽  
Roberta Maria Manzat-Saplacan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Ultrasound Parameters

Aims: Non-invasive methods are required to diagnose presence and grading of esophageal varices in patients with he- patic cirrhosis and in this respect we have evaluated the role of transient elastography and abdominal ultrasound parameters. Material and methods: Cirrhotic patients were prospectively evaluated by transient elastography and Doppler ultrasound for diagnosis of presence and grading of esophageal varices, the results being compared with the findings of the esophagogas- troduodenoscopy. Results: Sixty patients with hepatic cirrhosis were analysed. The parameters that reached statistical signifi- cance for diagnosis of esophageal varices were: liver stiffness (LSM) > 15 kPa, hemodynamic liver index (PVr1) ≥ 0.66, portal vascular resistance (PVR) > 17.66 and splenoportal index (SPI) > 4.77. The only parameter that reached statistical power for the diagnosis of large esophageal varices was LSM at a cut-off value of 28.8 kPa. Conclusions: Assessment of LSM in patients with liver cirrhosis can predict both the presence of esophageal varices and of large esophageal varices. The PVr1, PVR and SPI Doppler indexes can be used to diagnose the presence of esophageal varices but have no role in the prediction of large esophageal varices. Further studies are required to confirm these results and offer a stronger clinical significance.

scholarly journals Liver stiffness in chronic hepatitis C virus infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-98
Author(s):  
Romeo-Gabriel Mihăilă
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
A Value

Abstract Introduction. The severity of liver fibrosis can be assessed noninvasively today by liver stiffness measurements. Vibration-controlled transient elastography, shear wave elastography or magnetic resonance elastography are techniques increasingly used for this purpose. Methods. This article presents the recent advances in the use of new techniques for liver fibrosis assessment in chronic hepatitis C: the correlation between liver stiffness values and liver fibrosis estimated by liver biopsies, the prognosis role of liver stiffness values, their usefulness in monitoring the treatment response, in assessing the severity of portal hypertension and in estimating the presence of esophageal varices. Scientific articles from January 2017 to January 2018 were searched in PubMed and PubMed Central databases, using the terms “liver stiffness” and “hepatitis C”. Results. The median liver stiffness values measured with different techniques are not identical, so that FibroScan thresholds cannot be used on any other elastographic machine. The higher the liver’s stiffness measurement, the higher the liver-related events in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A liver stiffness measurement over 17 kPa could be an independent predictor for the presence of esophageal varices as well as a spleen with a longitudinal span ≥ 15 cm for patients with a value of liver stiffness < 17 kPa. A progressive and persistent decrease in liver stiffness is dependent on sustained virological response achievement. The lack of liver stiffness decrease has been associated with relapsers and a low value of liver stiffness at baseline. Conclusion. Liver stiffness provides clues about the severity and evolution of liver disease.

scholarly journals Point Shear Wave Elastography of the Spleen in Predicting the Presence of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis: Liver Stiffness vs. Spleen Stiffness

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
Nadella Sindhu ◽  
Prakashini Koteshwar ◽  
Shiran Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Shear Wave Elastography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spleen Stiffness ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Combined Parameters

Objective: To determine the diagnostic ability of the spleen and liver stiffness in predicting the presence of esophageal varices (EVs). Methods: A sample of cirrhotic patients, diagnosed with sonography, was recruited. The cohorts’ liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) were measured with the Philips’ Elast PQ technique. Platelet count and spleen size were also documented. The endoscopic report was used as the diagnostic gold standard. Singular and combined parameters were assessed to determine the presence of EV using an independent variable t test, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and multilogistic regression analysis statistical tests. Results: In predicting the presence of EV, there was a statistically significant difference in means of SS (2.13 ± 0.69 m/s vs. 3.23 ± 1.32 m/s) and LS (2.33 ± 1.20 m/s vs. 3.05 ± 1.4 m/s), as well as discriminating between groups of patients, with and without EV. The ability to diagnostically classify EV with SS and LS was fair while the remaining parameters were deemed poor, using a SS cutoff value of 1.99 m/s. Conclusion: Despite the difference in means, none of the assessed parameters demonstrated a better classification ability than endoscopy. LS and SS were equal in the prediction of EV in these patients. The LS estimate of fibrosis would have grossly predicted the presence of varices. However, the addition of SS, for the estimation of varices, provided no significant benefit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document