scholarly journals Evaluating the use of remote sensing data in the U.S. Agency for International Development Famine Early Warning Systems Network

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 063511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Brickley
Author(s):  
Zahidur Rahman ◽  
Leonid Roytman ◽  
Abdelhamid Kadik ◽  
Dilara A. Rosy ◽  
Pradipta Nandi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Jiameng Hu ◽  
Isaiah Snell-Feikema ◽  
Michael S. VanBemmel ◽  
Aashis Lamsal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sita Karki ◽  
Mohamed Sultan ◽  
Saleh A. Al-Sefry ◽  
Hassan M. Alharbi ◽  
Mustafa Kemal Emil ◽  
...  

Abstract. Construction of intensity-duration (ID) curves and early warning systems for landslides (EWSL) are hampered by the paucity of temporal and spatial archival data. We developed methodologies that could be used for the construction of an ID curve that could be used for the construction of an EWSL over the Faifa Mountains in the Red Sea Hills. The developed methodologies relies on temporal, readily available, archival Google Earth and Sentinel-1 imagery, precipitation measurements, and limited field data. These methodologies accurately distinguished landslide-producing storms from non–landslide producing ones and identified the locations of these landslides with an accuracy of 60 %.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2753-2772
Author(s):  
Doris Hermle ◽  
Markus Keuschnig ◽  
Ingo Hartmeyer ◽  
Robert Delleske ◽  
Michael Krautblatter

Abstract. While optical remote sensing has demonstrated its capabilities for landslide detection and monitoring, spatial and temporal demands for landslide early warning systems (LEWSs) had not been met until recently. We introduce a novel conceptual approach to structure and quantitatively assess lead time for LEWSs. We analysed “time to warning” as a sequence: (i) time to collect, (ii) time to process and (iii) time to evaluate relevant optical data. The difference between the time to warning and “forecasting window” (i.e. time from hazard becoming predictable until event) is the lead time for reactive measures. We tested digital image correlation (DIC) of best-suited spatiotemporal techniques, i.e. 3 m resolution PlanetScope daily imagery and 0.16 m resolution unmanned aerial system (UAS)-derived orthophotos to reveal fast ground displacement and acceleration of a deep-seated, complex alpine mass movement leading to massive debris flow events. The time to warning for the UAS/PlanetScope totals 31/21 h and is comprised of time to (i) collect – 12/14 h, (ii) process – 17/5 h and (iii) evaluate – 2/2 h, which is well below the forecasting window for recent benchmarks and facilitates a lead time for reactive measures. We show optical remote sensing data can support LEWSs with a sufficiently fast processing time, demonstrating the feasibility of optical sensors for LEWSs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Scott Whiteley ◽  
Arnaud Watlet ◽  
Jonathan Michael Kendall ◽  
Jonathan Edward Chambers

Abstract. We summarise the contribution of geophysical imaging to local landslide early warning systems (LoLEWS), highlighting how LoLEWS design and monitoring components benefit from the enhanced spatial and temporal resolutions of time-lapse geophysical imaging. In addition, we discuss how with appropriate laboratory-based petrophysical transforms, these geophysical data can be crucial for future slope failure forecasting and modelling, linking other methods of remote sensing and intrusive monitoring across different scales. We conclude that in light of ever increasing spatiotemporal resolutions of data acquisition, geophysical monitoring should be a more widely considered technology in the toolbox of methods available to stakeholders operating LoLEWS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3863-3871
Author(s):  
Jim S. Whiteley ◽  
Arnaud Watlet ◽  
J. Michael Kendall ◽  
Jonathan E. Chambers

Abstract. We summarise the contribution of geophysical imaging to local landslide early warning systems (LoLEWS), highlighting how the design and monitoring components of LoLEWS benefit from the enhanced spatial and temporal resolutions of time-lapse geophysical imaging. In addition, we discuss how with appropriate laboratory-based petrophysical transforms, geophysical data can be crucial for future slope failure forecasting and modelling, linking other methods of remote sensing and intrusive monitoring across different scales. We conclude that in light of ever-increasing spatiotemporal resolutions of data acquisition, geophysical monitoring should be a more widely considered technology in the toolbox of methods available to stakeholders operating LoLEWS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document