Robust initialization for 2D/3D registration of knee implant models to single-plane fluoroscopy

Author(s):  
J. Hermans ◽  
P. Claes ◽  
J. Bellemans ◽  
D. Vandermeulen ◽  
P. Suetens
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 1273-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsung-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Tung-Wu Lu ◽  
Chung-Ming Chen ◽  
Mei-Ying Kuo ◽  
Horng-Chaung Hsu

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tung-Wu Lu ◽  
Cheng-Chung Lin ◽  
Po-Hsiang Yu ◽  
Guan-Ying Li ◽  
Chien-Chung Kuo ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Accurate measurement of shoulder motion is critical in assessing impairment following shoulder disorders. To this end, measuring and recording joint motion are important steps in diagnosing, determining the severity and progression of a disorder, assessing the results of treatment, and evaluating impairment. Shoulder movement usually is composite rather than in a single plane, so isolating single movements is challenging. Universal goniometers with long arms are used to measure shoulder motion, and testing must be performed and recorded consistently. Passive motion may be carried out cautiously by the examiner; two measurements of the same patient by the same examiner should lie within 10° of each other. Shoulder extension and flexion are illustrated. Maximal flexion of the shoulder also includes slight external rotation and abduction, and controlling or eliminating these components during evaluation is challenging. Abduction and adduction are illustrated. Deficits in external rotation may occur in patients who have undergone reconstructive procedures with an anterior approach; deficits in internal rotation may result from issues with shoulder instability. The authors recommend recording the shoulder's range of motion measurements according to the Upper Extremity Impairment Evaluation Record in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fourth Edition.


Author(s):  
Nicola Piccinelli ◽  
Andrea Roberti ◽  
Eleonora Tagliabue ◽  
Francesco Setti ◽  
Gernot Kronreif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ran Zhao ◽  
Hong Cai ◽  
Hua Tian ◽  
Ke Zhang

Abstract Purpose The application of the anatomical parameters of the contralateral hip joint to guide the preoperative template of the affected side relies on the bilateral hip symmetry. We investigated the bilateral hip symmetry and range of anatomical variations by measurement and comparison of bilateral hip anatomical parameters. Methods This study included 224 patients (448 hips) who were diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femur head, and underwent bilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in our hospital from January 2012 to August 2020. Imaging data included 224 patients X-ray and 30 CT data at the end of the cohort. Anatomical parameters, including the acetabular abduction angle and trochanteric height, were measured using the Noble method. Postoperative measurements included stem size, difference of leg length and offset. Results Except for the isthmus width, there were no significant differences in the anatomical morphology of the hip joint. Among the demographic factors, there was a correlation between body weight and NSA. Among various anatomical parameters, a correlation was present between medullary cavity widths of T + 20, T, and T − 20. The difference in the use of stem size is not due to the morphological difference of bilateral medullary cavity, but due to the different of 1- or 2-stage surgery. Conclusion Bilateral symmetry was present among the patients with normal morphology of the hip medullary cavity, theoretically confirming the feasibility of structural reconstruction of the hip joint using the hip joint on the uninjured side. Additionally, the difference in the morphology of the hip medullary cavity is not present in a single plane but is synergistically affected by multiple adjacent planes.


2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 289-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Cui ◽  
Hirofumi Anno ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
Yuyin Guo ◽  
Takahisa Sato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S182-S183
Author(s):  
A. Ferkh ◽  
L. Stefani ◽  
S. Trivedi ◽  
P. Brown ◽  
M. Altman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document