Stark effect in a one‐dimensional model atom

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 757-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco M. Fernández ◽  
Eduardo A. Castro
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1489-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAIWANG CHENG ◽  
JIE LIU ◽  
SHIGANG CHEN

In this paper, the interactions between a one-dimensional model atom and intense laser field is approximately described by a map. Both the classical version and quantum version of this map are studied. It is shown that besides classical stable islands which can bound some phase space region against ionization and then are responsible for the atomic stabilization, there is another structure in phase space, the unstable manifold, which can determine the ionization process of the system. Quantumly, the quantum quasienergy eigenstates (QE state) under absorptive boundaries, which directly related to the ionization process, are calculated. We define the QE state with smallest ionization rate as QE0 state, which represents the stabilization degree. The Wigner distribution of such QE0 state show clear fringe structures. Finally we show that the classical description and quantum description are in a correspondence manner.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (07) ◽  
pp. 835-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. COSTIN ◽  
J. L. LEBOWITZ ◽  
C. STUCCHIO

We study the evolution of a one-dimensional model atom with δ-function binding potential, subjected to a dipole radiation field E(t)x with E(t) a 2π/ω-periodic real-valued function. We prove that when E(t) is a trigonometric polynomial, complete ionization occurs, i.e. the probability of finding the electron in any fixed region goes to zero as t → ∞. For ψ(x, t = 0) compactly supported and general periodic fields, we decompose ψ(x, t) into uniquely defined resonance terms and a remainder. Each resonance is 2π/ω periodic in time and behaves like the exponentially growing Green's function near x = ±∞. The remainder is given by an asymptotic power series in t-1/2 with coefficients varying with x.


1983 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
G. Brugnot

We consider the paper by Brugnot and Pochat (1981), which describes a one-dimensional model applied to a snow avalanche. The main advance made here is the introduction of the second dimension in the runout zone. Indeed, in the channelled course, we still use the one-dimensional model, but, when the avalanche spreads before stopping, we apply a (x, y) grid on the ground and six equations have to be solved: (1) for the avalanche body, one equation for continuity and two equations for momentum conservation, and (2) at the front, one equation for continuity and two equations for momentum conservation. We suppose the front to be a mobile jump, with longitudinal velocity varying more rapidly than transverse velocity.We solve these equations by a finite difference method. This involves many topological problems, due to the actual position of the front, which is defined by its intersection with the reference grid (SI, YJ). In the near future our two directions of research will be testing the code on actual avalanches and improving it by trying to make it cheaper without impairing its accuracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document