scholarly journals Physiological correlates of forward masking in single nerve‐fiber and compound neural responses recorded from the auditory nerve

1989 ◽  
Vol 85 (S1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13
Author(s):  
Evan M. Relkin ◽  
John R. Doucet ◽  
Robert L. Smith ◽  
Christopher W. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Forward Masking ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Single Nerve

Forward masking of click responses in auditory nerve fiber as a function of CF

1979 ◽  
Vol 65 (S1) ◽  
pp. S82-S83
Author(s):  
D. F. Dolan ◽  
D. C. Teas ◽  
R. C. Hill ◽  
J. P. Walton
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Forward Masking ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fiber

scholarly journals Pressure-clamped single-fiber recording technique: A new recording method for studying sensory receptors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 174480692092785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Sonekatsu ◽  
Hiroshi Yamada ◽  
Jianguo G Gu
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Single Fiber ◽  
Single Unit Recording ◽  
Sensory Receptors ◽  
Unit Recording ◽  
Recording Technique ◽  
C Fibers ◽  
Recording Method ◽  
Single Nerve

An electrophysiological technique that can record nerve impulses from a single nerve fiber is indispensable for studying modality-specific sensory receptors such as low threshold mechanoreceptors, thermal receptors, and nociceptors. The teased-fiber single-unit recording technique has long been used to resolve impulses that are likely to be from a single nerve fiber. The teased-fiber single-unit recording technique involves tedious nerve separation procedures, causes nerve fiber impairment, and is not a true single-fiber recording method. In the present study, we describe a new and true single-fiber recording technique, the pressure-clamped single-fiber recording method. We have applied this recording technique to mouse whisker hair follicle preparations with attached whisker afferents as well as to skin-nerve preparations made from mouse hindpaw skin and saphenous nerves. This new approach can record impulses from rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors (RA), slowly adapting type 1 mechanoreceptors (SA1), and slowly adapting type 2 mechanoreceptors (SA2) in these tissue preparations. We have also applied the pressure-clamped single-fiber recordings to record impulses on Aβ-fibers, Aδ-fibers, and C-fibers. The pressure-clamped single-fiber recording technique provides a new tool for sensory physiology and pain research.

scholarly journals Resolution of subcomponents of synaptic release from post-synaptic currents in rat hair-cell/auditory-nerve fiber synapses

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric D. Young ◽  
Jingjing Sherry Wu ◽  
Mamiko Niwa ◽  
Elisabeth Glowatzki
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cell ◽  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Hair Cells ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Neurotransmitter Release ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fiber ◽  
Vesicle Release ◽  
Synaptic Currents ◽  
Synaptic Release

AbstractThe synapse between inner hair cells and auditory nerve fiber dendrites shows large EPSCs, which are either monophasic or multiphasic. Multiquantal or uniquantal flickering release have been proposed to underlie the unusual multiphasic waveforms. Here the nature of multiphasic waveforms is analyzed using EPSCs recorded in vitro in rat afferent dendrites. Spontaneous EPSCs were deconvolved into a sum of presumed release events with monophasic EPSC waveforms. Results include: first, the charge of EPSCs is about the same for multiphasic versus monophasic EPSCs. Second, EPSC amplitudes decline with the number of release events per EPSC. Third, there is no evidence of a mini-EPSC. Most results can be accounted for by versions of either uniquantal or multiquantal release. However, serial neurotransmitter release in multiphasic EPSCs shows properties that are not fully explained by either model, especially that the amplitudes of individual release events is established at the beginning of a multiphasic EPSC, constraining possible models of vesicle release.

Responses of auditory nerve fibers of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Parham ◽  
H. B. Zhao ◽  
D. O. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Auditory System ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Forward Masking ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fiber ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Compound Action Potentials ◽  
Fiber Characteristic ◽  
Auditory Nerve Fibers ◽  
Central Auditory Neurons

1. To elucidate the peripheral contribution to "echo" processing in the auditory system, we examined the characteristics of auditory nerve responses to click-pair stimuli in unanesthetized, decerebrate cats. We used equilevel click pairs at peak levels of 45, 65, and 85 dB SPL re 20 microPa. The interclick intervals ranged from 1 to 32 ms. This study reports results from 78 auditory nerve fibers in 7 cats. The fibers were divided into 2 groups: 33 low- and 45 high-spontaneous rate (SR), with SRs less than and > or = 20 spikes/s, respectively. A method was introduced to quantify the second-click response, and its recovery was examined as a function of the interclick interval. 2. In general, auditory nerve fibers showed a gradual recovery of the second-click response as interclick interval was increased. Noticeable differences in the second-click response recovery functions emerged among fiber populations that were related to the SR. Low-SR fibers showed little change in the recovery functions of the second-click response as the click level was increased from 45 to 85 dB SPL. In contrast, high-SR fibers showed slower recoveries with increasing click level from 45 to 85 dB SPL. At 45 and 65 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the two SR groups were similar. At 85 dB SPL, high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers, regardless of fiber characteristic frequency. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response ranged from 1 to 6 ms (mean, 1.4 ms) among low-SR fibers. The interclick intervals at 50% second-click response for high-SR fibers, whereas similar to those for the low-SR fibers at 45 and 65 dB SPL, ranged from 2 to 16 ms (mean, 3 ms) for high-SR fibers, at 85 dB SPL. 3. We also examined auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) evoked by click-pair stimuli for various interclick intervals and click levels. With increasing interclick interval, the amplitude of the second-click CAP increased, and with increasing level, the second-click CAP showed slower recovery. At 45 dB SPL, the recovery functions of the second-click CAP were similar to those of the high- and low-SR fibers. At higher levels, the CAP exhibited lower second-click response values than both high- and low-SR fiber populations for interclick intervals < 4-8 ms. At 85 dB SPL, as interclick interval increased, between 8 and 16 ms, the CAP second-click response converged with that of the high-SR fibers, and by 32 ms, the second-click response values were similar for the CAP, high- and low-SR fibers. 4. The present results are consistent with those of forward masking studies at the level of the auditory nerve in that both demonstrate a short-term reduction of the neural responses. However, the two results differ in that we observed that high-SR fibers exhibited slower recovery than low-SR fibers in response to click-pair stimuli, opposite of the trend observed in the forward masking studies of responses to pure-tone bursts. 5. The present results on auditory nerve fiber responses to click-pair stimuli provide a reference for comparison with responses of central auditory neurons to similar stimuli. This information should serve to elucidate the peripheral contribution to the processing of echoes in the auditory system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document