Sound field amplification competes with noise control.

2008 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 2572-2572
Author(s):  
David Lubman
2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Flexer ◽  
Stephanie Long

1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Flexer ◽  
Joseph P. Millin ◽  
Lisa Brown

Because teachers manage and instruct students through verbal communication, it would seem logical that improvement of pupil's abilities to detect and attend to the teacher's speech could improve pupil performance. Using sound field amplification which increased the intensity of the teacher's voice by 10 dB, nine children who attended a primary-level class for children with developmental disabilities, made significantly fewer errors on a word identification task than they made without amplification. Observation showed the children to be more relaxed and to respond more quickly in the amplified condition.


2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne J. Wilson ◽  
Julie Marinac ◽  
Kathryn Pitty ◽  
Carolyn Burrows

1996 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick S. Berg ◽  
James C. Blair ◽  
Peggy V. Benson

Classroom acoustics are generally overlooked in American education. Noise, echoes, reverberation, and room modes typically interfere with the ability of listeners to understand speech. The effect of all of these acoustical parameters on teaching and learning in school needs to be researched more fully. Research has shown that these acoustical problems are commonplace in new as well as older schools, and when carried to an extreme, can greatly affect a child's ability to understand what is said (Barton, 1989; Blair, 1990; Crandell, 1991; Finitzo, 1988). The precise reason for overlooking these principles needs to be studied more fully. Recently, however, acoustic principles have been clarified, and technologies for measuring room acoustics and providing sound systems have become available to solve many of the acoustical problem in classrooms (Berg, 1993; Brook, 1991; D'Antonio, 1989; Davis & Davis, 1991; Davis & Jones, 1989; Eargle, 1989; Egan, 1988; Everest, 1987, 1989; Foreman, 1991; Hedeen, 1980). This article describes parameters of the problem, its impact on students and teachers, and four possible solutions to the problem. These solutions are noise control, signal control without amplification, individual amplification systems, and sound field amplification systems.


2004 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Massie ◽  
Deborah Theodoros ◽  
Bradley McPherson ◽  
Joseph Smaldino

AbstractSound-field amplification is an educational tool that allows control of the acoustic environment in a classroom. Teachers wear small microphones that transmit sound to a receiver system attached to loudspeakers around the classroom. The goal of sound-field amplification is to amplify the teacher’s voice by a few decibels, and to provide uniform amplification throughout the classroom without making speech too loud for normal hearing children. This report discusses the major findings of a study which investigated the effects of sound-field amplification intervention on the communication naturally occurring in the classrooms of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. The audiological findings of the sample population of children are presented, as well as details of the classroom acoustic environment. Sixty-seven percent of the children began the field trials with a slight hearing loss. The results confirmed the extremely noisy and reverberant conditions in which teachers and children are operating on a daily basis. The findings indicated that sound-field amplification intervention encouraged the children to interact with teachers and peers in a proactive way. Teachers identified voice-related factors to be a major personal benefit of the systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document