Student Teachers’ Perceptions of Cooperating Teachers’ Effectiveness

Author(s):  
Jean Brunelle ◽  
Marielle Tousignant ◽  
Maurice Piéron
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 556-569
Author(s):  
Eddie W.L. Cheng ◽  
Christina W.M. Yu ◽  
L.S. Sin ◽  
Carol S.M. Ma

Purpose Field experience (FE) has long been a crucial component of the process of teacher education. Clearly, a range of stakeholders can affect student-teachers’ achievements in FE. Given the importance of these stakeholders in FE, it may be possible to improve FE practices by clarifying the involvement of different parties in the FE process. Since student-teachers are the major beneficiaries in FE, their voices should not be ignored. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore student-teachers’ perceptions of the roles played by different stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach In a qualitative research design, 18 student-teachers took part in this study. Content analysis was used to classify and compress the large amount of text provided by the informants into a manageable number of categories to track trends, patterns, frameworks and typologies. Findings In addition to those of the five major stakeholders of FE (i.e. student-teachers, cooperating teachers, institute supervisors, schools and institutes), this study identified the roles of three other stakeholders (i.e. students, other student-teachers and parents) that had not been widely focused in previous studies. Originality/value The present research took the first step to investigate the roles played by different parties in FE from the perspective of student-teachers and offered insights for enhancing student-teachers’ performance in FE.


1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (s1) ◽  
pp. 80-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Brunelle ◽  
Marielle Tousignant ◽  
Maurice Piéron

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita Kapadia Matsko ◽  
Matthew Ronfeldt ◽  
Hillary Greene Nolan ◽  
Joshua Klugman ◽  
Michelle Reininger ◽  
...  

Drawing on survey and administrative data on cooperating teachers (CTs) and their preservice student teachers (PSTs) in Chicago Public Schools during 2014-2015, this study offers an in-depth look at reports of how CTs engage in their mentoring roles during student teaching, and their influence on PSTs. Our sample includes CTs working with PSTs from across 44 teacher preparation institutions. Central to our analysis is an exploration of CTs as both models of effective instruction and as facilitative coaches on PST development. We find that both CT roles matter—PSTs feel better prepared to teach when their CTs model effective instruction and coach by providing more instructional support, frequent and adequate feedback, collaborative activity, job-search support, and a balance of autonomy and encouragement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-97
Author(s):  
Alden H. Snell ◽  
Jill Wilson ◽  
Carolyn S. Cruse

Researchers have demonstrated the importance of professional development experiences for in-service music educators that are content-specific and that cultivate meaningful partnerships with higher education faculty and preservice music teachers. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore cooperating teachers’ perceptions related to hosting and mentoring student teachers. We interviewed 13 cooperating teachers to document their views. Based on interview results, we created and distributed an online questionnaire, with 102 cooperating teachers from five U.S. regions responding. Cooperating teachers’ motives for hosting student teachers were largely altruistic, and they identified various student teacher skills and university supervisor supports as being important. We suggest that the immersive experience of serving as a cooperating teacher may be a form of professional development.


1981 ◽  
Vol A (1) ◽  
pp. 80-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Brunelle ◽  
Marielle Tousignant ◽  
Maurice Piéron

Author(s):  
Clare Tyrer

AbstractThe gap between how learners interpret and act upon feedback has been widely documented in the research literature. What is less certain is the extent to which the modality and materiality of the feedback influence students’ and teachers’ perceptions. This article explores the semiotic potential of multimodal screen feedback to enhance written feedback. Guided by an “Inquiry Graphics” approach, situated within a semiotic theory of learning edusemiotic conceptual framework, constructions of meaning in relation to screencasting feedback were analysed to determine how and whether it could be incorporated into existing feedback practices. Semi-structured video elicitation interviews with student teachers were used to incorporate both micro and macro levels of analysis. The findings suggested that the relationship between the auditory, visual and textual elements in multimodal screen feedback enriched the feedback process, highlighting the importance of form in addition to content to aid understanding of written feedback. The constitutive role of design and material artefacts in feedback practices in initial teacher training pertinent to these findings is also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document