scholarly journals Small-Molecule Screens: A Gateway to Cancer Therapeutic Agents with Case Studies of Food and Drug Administration–Approved Drugs

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan P. Coussens ◽  
John C. Braisted ◽  
Tyler Peryea ◽  
G. Sitta Sittampalam ◽  
Anton Simeonov ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Rodrigues ◽  
Fernanda S. Sagrillo ◽  
Carlos A. M. Fraga

Duvelisib (Copiktra®) is a dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Kδ and PI3Kγ). In 2018, duvelisib was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) after at least two prior therapies. Duvelisib has also been approved under accelerated track for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after at least two prior systemic therapies. In this review, we provide a series of information about duvelisib, such as the development of clinical trials for LLC/SLL and FL and the steps used for its synthesis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e209498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea MacGregor ◽  
Audrey D. Zhang ◽  
Joshua D. Wallach ◽  
Joseph S. Ross ◽  
Matthew Herder

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-145 ◽  
Author(s):  

Physicians who prescribe a new drug that has not been approved for a specific indication or a specific age group frequently find themselves in a quandary. Physicians who prescribe "old," time-honored drugs usually do not consult the package insert or search for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. This statement was written to clarify the legal and informational status of the package insert and the role of the FDA in approving or not approving drugs for specific indications or specific age groups. The unapproved use of approved drugs, or so-called "off-label" use, is extremely prevalent among physicians who care for children. It is important that such use of compounds be brought up to date with current FDA policies and to emphasize the responsibility of the prescribing physician in the use of these compounds.


1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Cranston ◽  
Michael A. Williams ◽  
Nancy H. Nielsen ◽  
Rebecca J. Bezman

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyuan Cao ◽  
Siqi Dong ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Minmin Zhou ◽  
Jiao Guo ◽  
...  

Lujo virus (LUJV) belongs to the Old World (OW) genus Mammarenavirus (family Arenaviridae). It is categorized as a biosafety level (BSL) 4 agent. Currently, there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs or vaccines specifically for LUJV or other pathogenic OW mammarenaviruses. Here, a high-throughput screening of an FDA-approved drug library was conducted using pseudotype viruses bearing LUJV envelope glycoprotein (GPC) to identify inhibitors of LUJV entry. Three hit compounds, trametinib, manidipine, and lercanidipine, were identified as LUJV entry inhibitors in the micromolar range. Mechanistic studies revealed that trametinib inhibited LUJV GPC-mediated membrane fusion by targeting C410 [located in the transmembrane (TM) domain], while manidipine and lercanidipine inhibited LUJV entry by acting as calcium channel blockers. Meanwhile, all three hits extended their antiviral spectra to the entry of other pathogenic mammarenaviruses. Furthermore, all three could inhibit the authentic prototype mammarenavirus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), and could prevent infection at the micromolar level. This study shows that trametinib, manidipine, and lercanidipine are candidates for LUJV therapy and highlights the critical role of calcium in LUJV infection. The presented findings reinforce the notion that the key residue(s) located in the TM domain of GPC provide an entry-targeted platform for designing mammarenavirus inhibitors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Aebersold

The Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule in May 2002 to permit the Agency to approve drugs or license biological products on the basis of animal efficacy studies for use in ameliorating or preventing serious or life-threatening conditions caused by exposure to lethal or permanently disabling toxic biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear substances. Only two drugs were approved in the first nine years of the “Animal Rule” despite massive investment by the federal government since 2001 to stimulate development of medical countermeasures to biological threats. This article therefore examines the Food and Drug Administration reviews made public after approval of those two drugs and the public discussion at the Agency's Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee of one biological product under development under the Animal Rule. Despite the paucity of approved drugs or licensed biological products as medical countermeasures, several investigational drugs have been placed in the National Strategic Stockpile for use as medical countermeasures, if needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document