scholarly journals Observation of others’ painful heat stimulation involves responses in the spinal cord

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (14) ◽  
pp. eabe8444
Author(s):  
Alexandra Tinnermann ◽  
Christian Büchel ◽  
Jan Haaker

Observing others’ aversive experiences is central to know what is dangerous for ourselves. Hence, observation often elicits behavioral and physiological responses comparable to first-hand aversive experiences and engages overlapping brain activation. While brain activation to first-hand aversive experiences relies on connections to the spinal cord, it is unresolved whether merely observing aversive stimulation also involves responses in the spinal cord. Here, we show that observation of others receiving painful heat stimulation involves neural responses in the spinal cord, located in the same cervical segment as first-hand heat pain. However, while first-hand painful experiences are coded within dorsolateral regions of the spinal cord, observation of others’ painful heat stimulation involves medial regions. Dorsolateral areas that process first-hand pain exhibit negative responses when observing pain in others. Our results suggest a distinct processing between self and others’ pain in the spinal cord when integrating social information.

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 951-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Casey ◽  
Thomas J. Morrow ◽  
Jürgen Lorenz ◽  
Satoshi Minoshima

To learn about the sequence of brain activation patterns during heat pain, we acquired positron emission tomographic (PET) brain scans at different times during repetitive heat stimulation (40 or 50°C; 5-s contact) of each subject's left forearm. Early scans began at the onset of 60 s of stimulation; late scans began after 40 s of stimulation, which continued throughout the 60-s scan period (total stimulus duration 100 s). Each subject (14 normal, right-handed subjects; 10 male, 4 female; ages 18–42) used a visual analog scale to rate the perceived stimulus intensity (0 = no heat, 7 = pain threshold, 10 = barely tolerable pain) after each scan. The 40°C stimulation received an average intensity rating of 2.19 ± 1.22 (mean ± SD) and the 50°C an average rating of 8.93 ± 1.33. During the scan sessions, subjects did not report a difference between early and late scans. To examine the effect of the duration of stimulation specifically, 8 of these subjects rated the perceived intensity of each of 20 sequential 5-s duration contact heat stimuli (40 or 50°C; 100 s of stimulation). We used a graphical method to detect changes in perceived unpleasantness. There was no difference in perceived intensity or unpleasantness during the 40°C stimulation. However, during 50°C stimulation, perceived unpleasantness increased and subjects perceived the last five, but not the second five, stimuli as more intense than the first five stimuli. These psychophysical changes could be mediated by brain structures with increasing activity from early to late PET scans or that are active only during late scans. These structures include the contralateral M1/S1 cortex, bilateral S2 and mid-insular cortex, contralateral VP thalamus, medial ipsilateral thalamus, and the vermis and paravermis of the cerebellum. Structures that are equally active throughout stimulation (contralateral mid-anterior cingulate and premotor cortex) are less likely to mediate these psychophysical changes. Some cortical, but not subcortical, structures showed significant or borderline activation only during the early scans (ipsilateral premotor cortex, contralateral perigenual anterior cingulate, lateral prefrontal, and anterior insular cortex); they may mediate pain-related attentive or anticipatory functions. Overall, the results reveal that 1) the pattern of brain activation and the perception of heat pain both change during repetitive noxious heat stimulation, 2) cortical activity can be detected before subcortical responses appear, and 3) timing the stimulation with respect to the scan period can, together with psychophysical measurements, identify brain structures that are likely to participate in the perception of pain.


1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S18
Author(s):  
Y. Bhambhani ◽  
L. Holland ◽  
P. Eriksson ◽  
R. Stendward

1946 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Phemister ◽  
B. Eichelberger Dallas ◽  
Lillian ◽  
Carl. Laestar

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. e194
Author(s):  
Qianmei Hou ◽  
Guohui Jiang ◽  
Shu Peng ◽  
Li Song ◽  
Juan Tan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob H. Andersen ◽  
Ulrik Grevstad ◽  
Hanna Siegel ◽  
Jørgen B. Dahl ◽  
Ole Mathiesen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics may prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Whether this is mediated by a perineural or systemic mechanism remains unknown. The authors hypothesized that dexmedetomidine has a peripheral mechanism of action. Methods The authors conducted a randomized, paired, triple-blind trial in healthy volunteers. All received bilateral saphenous nerve blocks with 20 ml ropivacaine, 0.5%, plus 1 ml dexmedetomidine, 100 µg/ml, in one thigh and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.5% plus 1 ml saline in the other thigh. The primary outcome measure was the duration of block assessed by temperature sensation (alcohol swab). The secondary outcome measure was the duration of block assessed by pinprick, pain during tonic heat stimulation, warmth detection threshold, and heat pain detection threshold. Results All 21 enrolled volunteers completed the trial. The mean duration of block assessed by temperature sensation in the leg receiving ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine was 22 h (95% CI, 21 to 24) compared to 20 h (95% CI, 19 to 21) in the leg receiving ropivacaine plus placebo with a mean difference of 2 h (95% CI, 1 to 3; P = 0.001). The duration of block was also significantly longer in the leg receiving dexmedetomidine when assessed by pinprick, pain during tonic heat stimulation, and warmth detection threshold but not heat pain detection threshold. One participant experienced numbness in an area in the leg receiving dexmedetomidine. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine prolongs the duration of a saphenous nerve block by a peripheral mechanism when controlling for systemic effects but not necessarily to a clinically relevant extent.


Pain ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (8) ◽  
pp. 1408-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Forkmann ◽  
Wiebke Grashorn ◽  
Katharina Schmidt ◽  
Odette Fründt ◽  
Carsten Buhmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document