scholarly journals Population Pharmacokinetics of Doripenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd H. Abdul-Aziz ◽  
Azrin N. Abd Rahman ◽  
Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor ◽  
Helmi Sulaiman ◽  
Steven C. Wallis ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDoripenem has been recently introduced in Malaysia and is used for severe infections in the intensive care unit. However, limited data currently exist to guide optimal dosing in this scenario. We aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of doripenem in Malaysian critically ill patients with sepsis and use Monte Carlo dosing simulations to develop clinically relevant dosing guidelines for these patients. In this pharmacokinetic study, 12 critically ill adult patients with sepsis receiving 500 mg of doripenem every 8 h as a 1-hour infusion were enrolled. Serial blood samples were collected on 2 different days, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. A two-compartment linear model with between-subject and between-occasion variability on clearance was adequate in describing the data. The typical volume of distribution and clearance of doripenem in this cohort were 0.47 liters/kg and 0.14 liters/kg/h, respectively. Doripenem clearance was significantly influenced by patients' creatinine clearance (CLCR), such that a 30-ml/min increase in the estimated CLCRwould increase doripenem CL by 52%. Monte Carlo dosing simulations suggested that, for pathogens with a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a dose of 1,000 mg every 8 h as a 4-h infusion is optimal for patients with a CLCRof 30 to 100 ml/min, while a dose of 2,000 mg every 8 h as a 4-h infusion is best for patients manifesting a CLCRof >100 ml/min. Findings from this study suggest that, for doripenem usage in Malaysian critically ill patients, an alternative dosing approach may be meritorious, particularly when multidrug resistance pathogens are involved.

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 3430-3436 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Plachouras ◽  
M. Karvanen ◽  
L. E. Friberg ◽  
E. Papadomichelakis ◽  
A. Antoniadou ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Colistin is used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). It is administered intravenously in the form of colistin methanesulfonate (CMS), which is hydrolyzed in vivo to the active drug. However, pharmacokinetic data are limited. The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of CMS and colistin in a population of critically ill patients. Patients receiving colistin for the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB were enrolled in the study; however, patients receiving a renal replacement therapy were excluded. CMS was administered at a dose of 3 million units (240 mg) every 8 h. Venous blood was collected immediately before and at multiple occasions after the first and the fourth infusions. Plasma CMS and colistin concentrations were determined by a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method after a rapid precipitation step that avoids the significant degradation of CMS and colistin. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the NONMEM program. Eighteen patients (6 females; mean age, 63.6 years; mean creatinine clearance, 82.3 ml/min) were included in the study. For CMS, a two-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics, and the half-lives of the two phases were estimated to be 0.046 h and 2.3 h, respectively. The clearance of CMS was 13.7 liters/h. For colistin, a one-compartment model was sufficient to describe the data, and the estimated half-life was 14.4 h. The predicted maximum concentrations of drug in plasma were 0.60 mg/liter and 2.3 mg/liter for the first dose and at steady state, respectively. Colistin displayed a half-life that was significantly long in relation to the dosing interval. The implications of these findings are that the plasma colistin concentrations are insufficient before steady state and raise the question of whether the administration of a loading dose would benefit critically ill patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 6550-6557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz S. Alobaid ◽  
Steven C. Wallis ◽  
Paul Jarrett ◽  
Therese Starr ◽  
Janine Stuart ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTOur objective was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in a cohort of critically ill nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients prescribed fluconazole were recruited into three body mass index (BMI) cohorts, nonobese (18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2), obese (30.0 to 39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m2). Serial fluconazole concentrations were determined using a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were undertaken with Pmetrics. Twenty-one critically ill patients (11 male) were enrolled, including obese (n= 6) and morbidly obese (n= 4) patients. The patients mean ± standard deviation (SD) age, weight, and BMI were 54 ± 15 years, 90 ± 24 kg, and 31 ± 9 kg/m2, respectively. A two-compartment linear model described the data adequately. The mean ± SD population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were clearance (CL) of 0.95 ± 0.48 liter/h, volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc) of 15.10 ± 11.78 liter, intercompartmental clearance from the central to peripheral compartment of 5.41 ± 2.28 liter/h, and intercompartmental clearance from the peripheral to central compartment of 2.92 ± 4.95 liter/h. A fluconazole dose of 200 mg daily was insufficient to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound drug fraction/MIC ratio of 100 for pathogens with MICs of ≥2 mg/liter in patients with BMI of >30 kg/m2. A fluconazole loading dose of 12 mg/kg and maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg/day achieved pharmacodynamic targets for higher MICs. A weight-based loading dose of 12 mg/kg followed by a daily maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg, according to renal function, is required in critically ill patients for pathogens with a MIC of 2 mg/liter.


2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 7240-7248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Karaiskos ◽  
Lena E. Friberg ◽  
Konstantinos Pontikis ◽  
Konstantinos Ioannidis ◽  
Vasiliki Tsagkari ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTColistin has been revived, in the era of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative infections, as the last-resort treatment in critically ill patients. Recent studies focusing on the optimal dosing strategy of colistin have demonstrated the necessity of a loading dose at treatment initiation (D. Plachouras, M. Karvanen, L. E. Friberg, E. Papadomichelakis, A. Antoniadou, I. Tsangaris, I. Karaiskos, G. Poulakou, F. Kontopidou, A. Armaganidis, O. Cars, and H. Giamarellou, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3430–3436, 2009,http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01361-08; A. F. Mohamed, I. Karaiskos, D. Plachouras, M. Karvanen, K. Pontikis, B. Jansson, E. Papadomichelakis, A. Antoniadou, H. Giamarellou, A. Armaganidis, O. Cars, and L. E. Friberg, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:4241– 4249, 2012,http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.06426-11; S. M. Garonzik, J. Li, V. Thamlikitkul, D. L. Paterson, S. Shoham, J. Jacob, F. P. Silveira, A. Forrest, and R. L. Nation, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3284–3294, 2011,http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01733-10). In 19 critically ill patients with suspected or microbiologically documented infections caused by XDR Gram-negative strains, a loading dose of 9 MU colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) (∼270 mg colistin base activity) was administered with a maintenance dose of 4.5 MU every 12 h, commenced after 24 h. Patients on renal replacement were excluded. CMS infusion was given over 30 min or 1 h. Repeated blood sampling was performed after the loading dose and after the 5th or 6th dose. Colistin concentrations and measured CMS, determined after hydrolization to colistin and including the partially sulfomethylated derivatives, were determined with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in NONMEM with the new data combined with data from previous studies. Measured colistimethate concentrations were described by 4 compartments for distribution and removal of sulfomethyl groups, while colistin disposition followed a 1-compartment model. The average observed maximum colistin A plus B concentration was 2.65 mg/liter after the loading dose (maximum time was 8 h). A significantly higher availability of the measured A and B forms of colistimethate and colistin explained the higher-than-expected concentrations in the present study compared to those in previous studies. Creatinine clearance was a time-varying covariate of colistimethate clearance. The incidence of acute renal injury was 20%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Nonoshita ◽  
Yosuke Suzuki ◽  
Ryota Tanaka ◽  
Tetsuya Kaneko ◽  
Yoshifumi Ohchi ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to construct a novel population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model of doripenem (DRPM) for Japanese patients in intensive care unit, incorporating the clearance of DRPM by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Twenty-one patients treated with DRPM (0.25 or 0.5 g) by intravenous infusion over 1 h were included in the study. Nine of the 21 patients were receiving CRRT. Plasma samples were obtained before and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after the first DRPM administration. PPK analysis was conducted by nonlinear mixed effects modeling using a two-compartment model. Total clearance (CLtotal) in the model was divided into CRRT clearance (CLCRRT) and body clearance (CLbody). The final model was: CLtotal (L h−1) = CLbody(non-CRRT) = 3.65 × (Ccr/62.25)0.64 in the absence of CRRT, or = CLbody(CRRT) + CLCRRT = 2.49 × (Ccr/52.75)0.42 + CLCRRT in the presence of CRRT; CLCRRT = QE × 0.919 (0.919 represents non-protein binding rate of DRPM); V1 (L) = 10.04; V2 (L) = 8.13; and Q (L h−1) = 3.53. Using this model, CLtotal was lower and the distribution volumes (V1 and V2) tended to be higher compared to previous reports. Also, Ccr was selected as a significant covariate for CLbody. Furthermore, the contribution rate of CLCRRT to CLtotal was 30–40%, suggesting the importance of drug removal by CRRT. The population analysis model used in this study is a useful tool for planning DRPM regimen and administration. Our novel model may contribute greatly to proper use of DRPM in patients requiring intensive care.


2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. e1.31-e1
Author(s):  
Nienke J Vet ◽  
Brenda CM de Winter ◽  
Saskia N de Wildt ◽  
Bart CH van der Nagel ◽  
Catherijne AJ Knibbe ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo develop a population pharmacokinetic model of R-albuterol and S-albuterol for children suffering from status asthmaticus following continuous intravenous administration.MethodsAt the pediatric ICU 19 children suffering from severe status asthmaticus were treated using continuous intravenous albuterol in doses based on clinical symptoms (range 0.1–10 µg/kg/min). During therapy 111 blood samples were collected and analysed for R- and S-albuterol using a validated LC/MS-MS method. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM 7.2). Data was logarithmically transformed. Model selection criteria were decrease in objective function, diagnostic plots and NPDE. The covariates (range) analysed were bodyweight (7.8–70 kg), age (0.8–15.3 years), creatinine concentration (17–70 µmol/L), alanine transaminase (5–29 IU/L), and urea (1.6–4.8 mmol/L).ResultsA two-compartment model with separated clearance for R- (16.3 L/h) and S-albuterol (8.8 L/h) best described the data. Separated values for central volume of distribution (12.9 L), peripheral volume of distribution (45.2 L) and intercompartmental clearance (20.0 L/h) did not improve the model. Between-subject variability was described for clearance of R-albuterol (42%), clearance of S-albuterol (37%) and central volume of distribution (280%). Weight is a significant covariate using a power function. The exponent of the powerfunction was fixed at 0.75 for clearance and intercompartmental and at 1 for central and peripheral volume of distribution. Estimation of the exponent resulted in similar values and did not improve the model. No other covariates were identified.ConclusionThe population pharmacokinetics of R- and S-albuterol are described. This model can be used to evaluate the correlation between albuterol pharmacokinetics and effect in a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document