scholarly journals Flow Cytometric Investigation of Filamentation, Membrane Patency, and Membrane Potential in Escherichia coli following Ciprofloxacin Exposure

2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Wickens ◽  
R. J. Pinney ◽  
D. J. Mason ◽  
V. A. Gant

ABSTRACT Ninety-eight percent of the cells in a population ofEscherichia coli in log-phase growth lost colony-forming ability after being exposed for 3 h to the quinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin at four times the MIC in nutrient broth, a concentration easily reached in vivo. Flow cytometric analysis, however, demonstrated that only 68% of this bacterial population had lost membrane potential, as judged by the membrane potential-sensitive dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol [DiBAC4(3)], and only 30% could no longer exclude the nucleic acid-binding dye propidium iodide (PI), reflecting lost membrane integrity, efflux mechanisms, or both. Subsequent removal of ciprofloxacin and resuspension in nutrient broth resulted in renewed cell division after 2 h, with a calculated postantibiotic effect (PAE) time of 57 min. The proportion of DiBAC- and PI-fluorescent cells in this recovering population remained stable for more than 4 h after antibiotic removal. Eighty percent of cells present at drug removal were filamentous. Their number subsequently decreased with time, and the increase in particle count seen at the end of the PAE resulted from the division of short cells. Exposure to ciprofloxacin in the presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor chloramphenicol increased colony-forming ability to 60% of starting population numbers. In contrast to ciprofloxacin alone, this antibiotic combination resulted in insignificant filamentation and no dye uptake. Subsequent drug removal and resuspension in nutrient broth resulted in the appearance of filaments within 1 h, with 69% of the population forming filaments at 3 h. Dye uptake was also seen, with 20% of the population fluorescing with either dye after 4 h. We were unable to relate dye uptake to the viable count. Cell division resumed 240 min after removal of both drugs, yielding a PAE calculated at 186 min. Inhibition of protein synthesis with chloramphenicol prevented ciprofloxacin-induced changes in bacterial morphology, cell membrane potential, and ability to exclude nucleic acid-binding dye. These changes persisted beyond the end of the classically defined PAE and were not a definite indicator of cell death as defined by loss of colony formation, which related at least in part to filamentation.

2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona C. Mortimer ◽  
David J. Mason ◽  
Vanya A. Gant

ABSTRACT Three fluorescent nucleic acid binding dyes—propidium iodide, TO-PRO-1, and SYTOX green—were evaluated, and their abilities to distinguish between bacterial cells with and without an intact cytoplasmic membrane were compared. Each dye was readily able to discriminate between healthy and permeabilized cells ofEscherichia coli, although SYTOX green showed a greater enhancement in fluorescence intensity on staining-compromised, as opposed to healthy, cells in log-phase growth, than either PI or TO-PRO-1. Flow cytometric analysis of E. coli stained with these dyes after exposing them to several antimicrobial agents showed that all three dyes were able to detect antimicrobial action. Notably, however, the intensity of the cell-associated fluorescence was related to the mechanism of action of the antimicrobial agent. Large changes in fluorescence intensity were observed for all the dyes subsequent to β-lactam antibiotic action, but smaller changes (or no change) were seen subsequent to exposure to antimicrobials acting directly or indirectly on nucleic acid synthesis. Furthermore, cell-associated fluorescence did not relate to loss of viability as determined by plate counts. Despite offering much insight into antimicrobial mechanisms of action, these fundamental problems become relevant to the development of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests if colony formation is used as the standard.


2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 714a-715a
Author(s):  
Catalin Chimerel ◽  
Christopher M. Field ◽  
Silvia Piñero-Fernandez ◽  
Silvia M. Hernandez-Ainsa ◽  
David K. Summers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document