scholarly journals Multimethod Longitudinal HIV Drug Resistance Analysis in Antiretroviral-Therapy-Naive Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 2785-2800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aubin J. Nanfack ◽  
Andrew D. Redd ◽  
Jude S. Bimela ◽  
Genesis Ncham ◽  
Emmanuel Achem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Sanger Sequencing ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Amplification Refractory Mutation System ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance ◽  
Arms Pcr ◽  
Mutation System ◽  
Major Mutation ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT The global intensification of antiretroviral therapy (ART) can lead to increased rates of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations in treated and also in ART-naive patients. ART-naive HIV-1-infected patients from Cameroon were subjected to a multimethod HIVDR analysis using amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR, Sanger sequencing, and longitudinal next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine their profiles for the mutations K103N, Y181C, K65R, M184V, and T215F/Y. We processed 66 ART-naive HIV-1-positive patients with highly diverse subtypes that underlined the predominance of CRF02_AG and the increasing rate of F2 and other recombinant forms in Cameroon. We compared three resistance testing methods for 5 major mutation sites. Using Sanger sequencing, the overall prevalence of HIVDR mutations was 7.6% (5/66) and included all studied mutations except K65R. Comparing ARMS-PCR with Sanger sequencing as a reference, we obtained a sensitivity of 100% (5/5) and a specificity of 95% (58/61), caused by three false-positive calls with ARMS-PCR. For 32/66 samples, we obtained NGS data and we observed two additional mismatches made up of minority variants (7% and 18%) that might not be clinically relevant. Longitudinal NGS analyses revealed changes in HIVDR mutations in all five positive subjects that could not be attributed to treatment. In one of these cases, superinfection led to the temporary masking of a resistant virus. HIVDR mutations can be sensitively detected by ARMS-PCR and sequencing methods with comparable performances. Longitudinal changes in HIVDR mutations have to be considered even in the absence of treatment.

scholarly journals Use of Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR Assay as a Simple and Effective Tool To Detect HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1662-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aubin J. Nanfack ◽  
Lucy Agyingi ◽  
Jean Jacques N. Noubiap ◽  
Johnson N. Ngai ◽  
Vittorio Colizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Amplification Refractory Mutation System ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Drug Resistance Mutations ◽  
Mutation System ◽  
Hiv 1

scholarly journals Evaluation of the HIV-1 drug resistance to elsulfavirine and the effectiveness of it among Russian treatment-naïve patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
A. A. Kirichenko ◽  
D. E. Kireev ◽  
A. V. Kravchenko ◽  
A. V. Pokrovskaya ◽  
U. A. Kuimova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing ◽  
The Third ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1

The aim of the study: to analyze the prevalence of resistance mutations to elsulfavirine and to evaluate the effectiveness of it among HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 578 patients with HIV infection, which divided into 3 groups. The first group is 354 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients for whom HIV-1 nucleotide sequences were obtained as part of routine drug resistance testing. The second study group included 111 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients, tested for drug resistance before the antiretroviral therapy containing elsulfavirine. The third study group included 113 HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients, each of whom was assigned a treatment regimen containing elsulfavirine without prior drug resistance testing. The observation period for patients of the second and third groups who received treatment was 24 weeks. To assess the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in patients, viral load, CD4+ T-cell counts, and adherence to therapy were assessed. HIV-1 subtypes and drug resistance mutations were determined using the Stanford HIV Resistance Database (v. 8.9-1). To clarify the results of subtyping, phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences was carried out using the MEGA program (v. 6.0).Results. The prevalence of mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to elsulfavirine among HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients was 1.7% and 4.5% for the first and second groups of patients, respectively. All of the patients have only single resistance mutations which, according to the results of preclinical studies, cannot cause drug resistance. The use of elsulfavirine in real clinical practice among treatment-naïve patients has demonstrated good virological and immunological efficacy of the drug. As a result of 24 weeks of therapy in patients of the second group, no treatment ineffectiveness, and the development of drug resistance were observed. Among the patients of the third group, 6 patients (5.3%) have the virological failure of therapy associated with the resistance to the used drugs. All patients with virological failure had a resistance mutation profile associated with a high level of drug resistance to one of the drugs in the treatment regimen, lamivudine. Additionally, 1 patient had a combination of mutations that reduce susceptibility to elsulfavirine, and 4 patients had mutations that can reduce susceptibility to elsulfavirine in combination with other mutations.Conclusion. The low prevalence of mutations associated with a decrease in susceptibility to elsulfavirine and the absence of combinations of mutations make it possible to predict the successful use of this drug for Russian treatment-naïve patients. Reported cases of virological failure of antiretroviral therapy are difficult to interpret in the context of elsulfavirine due to the lack of an exact list of mutations and their combinations, and associations with the degree of resistance to it. This study describes for the first time the mutation profiles in patients with virological failure of therapy containing elsulfavirine and demonstrates the necessity of the further study of drug resistance profile to drug in vitro and in vivo.

scholarly journals Limited marginal utility of deep sequencing for HIV drug resistance testing in the age of integrase inhibitors

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Dalmat ◽  
Negar Makhsous ◽  
Gregory Pepper ◽  
Amalia Magaret ◽  
Keith R. Jerome ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Sanger Sequencing ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Antiviral Resistance ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs

AbstractHIV drug resistance genotyping is a critical tool in the clinical management of HIV infections. Although resistance genotyping has traditionally been conducted using Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a powerful tool due to its ability to detect lower frequency alleles. However, the value added from NGS approaches to antiviral resistance testing remains to be demonstrated. We compared the variant detection capacity of NGS versus Sanger sequencing methods for resistance genotyping of 144 drug resistance tests (105 protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 39 integrase tests) submitted to our clinical virology laboratory over a four-month period in 2016 for Sanger-based HIV drug resistance testing. NGS detected all true high frequency drug resistance mutations (>20% frequency) found by Sanger sequencing, with greater accuracy in one instance of a Sanger-detected false positive. Freely available online NGS variant callers Hydra and PASeq were superior to Sanger methods for interpretations of allele linkage and automated variant calling. NGS additionally detected low frequency mutations (1-20% frequency) associated with higher levels of drug resistance in 30/105 (29%) of protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 4/39 (10%) of integrase tests. Clinical follow-up of 69 individuals for a median of 674 days found no difference in rates of virological failure between individuals with and without low frequency mutations, although rates of virological failure were higher for individuals with drug-relevant low frequency mutations. However, all 27 individuals who experienced virological failure reported poor adherence to their drug regimen during preceding follow-up time, and all 19 who subsequently improved their adherence achieved viral suppression at later time points consistent with a lack of clinical resistance. In conclusion, in a population with low antiviral resistance emergence, NGS methods detected numerous instances of minor alleles that did not result in subsequent bona fide virological failure due to antiviral resistance.ImportanceGenotypic antiviral resistance testing for HIV is an essential component of the clinical microbiology and virology laboratory. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for the detection of low frequency sequence variants (allele frequencies <20%). Whether detecting these low frequency mutations in HIV contributes to improved patient health, however, remains unclear. We compared NGS to conventional Sanger sequencing for detecting resistance mutations for 144 HIV drug resistance tests submitted to our clinical virology laboratory and detected low frequency mutations in 24% of tests. Over approximately two years of follow-up for 69 patients for which we had access to electronic health records, no patients had virological failure due to antiviral resistance. Instead, virological failure was entirely explained by medication non-adherence. While larger studies are required, we suggest that detection of low frequency variants by NGS presents limited marginal clinical utility when compared to standard of care.

scholarly journals Limited Marginal Utility of Deep Sequencing for HIV Drug Resistance Testing in the Age of Integrase Inhibitors

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit R. Dalmat ◽  
Negar Makhsous ◽  
Gregory G. Pepper ◽  
Amalia Magaret ◽  
Keith R. Jerome ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Sanger Sequencing ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Antiviral Resistance ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing

ABSTRACTHIV drug resistance genotyping is a critical tool in the clinical management of HIV infections. Although resistance genotyping has traditionally been conducted using Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a powerful tool due to its ability to detect low-frequency alleles. However, the clinical value added from NGS approaches to antiviral resistance testing remains to be demonstrated. We compared the variant detection capacity of NGS versus Sanger sequencing methods for resistance genotyping in 144 drug resistance tests (105 protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 39 integrase tests) submitted to our clinical virology laboratory over a four-month period in 2016 for Sanger-based HIV drug resistance testing. NGS detected all true high-frequency drug resistance mutations (>20% frequency) found by Sanger sequencing, with greater accuracy in one instance of a Sanger-detected false positive. Freely available online NGS variant callers HyDRA and PASeq were superior to Sanger methods for interpretations of allele linkage and automated variant calling. NGS additionally detected low-frequency mutations (1 to 20% frequency) associated with higher levels of drug resistance in 30/105 (29%) protease-reverse transcriptase tests and 4/39 (10%) integrase tests. In clinical follow-up of 69 individuals for a median of 674 days, we did not find a difference in rates of virological failure between individuals with and without low-frequency mutations, although rates of virological failure were higher for individuals with drug-relevant low-frequency mutations. However, all 27 individuals who experienced virological failure reported poor adherence to their drug regimen during the preceding follow-up time, and all 19 who subsequently improved their adherence achieved viral suppression at later time points, consistent with a lack of clinical resistance. In conclusion, in a population with low antiviral resistance emergence, NGS methods detected numerous instances of minor alleles that did not result in subsequent bona fide virological failure due to antiviral resistance.

Primary HIV Drug Resistance and Efficacy of First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy Guided by Resistance Testing

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Oette ◽  
Rolf Kaiser ◽  
Martin D??umer ◽  
Ruth Petch ◽  
Gerd F??tkenheuer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance

scholarly journals HIV Drug Resistance Testing by High-Multiplex “Wide” Sequencing on the MiSeq Instrument

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 6824-6833 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Lapointe ◽  
W. Dong ◽  
G. Q. Lee ◽  
D. R. Bangsberg ◽  
J. N. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Sanger Sequencing ◽  
Illumina Miseq ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Miseq Sequencing ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing

ABSTRACTLimited access to HIV drug resistance testing in low- and middle-income countries impedes clinical decision-making at the individual patient level. An efficient protocol to address this issue must be established to minimize negative therapeutic outcomes for HIV-1-infected individuals in such settings. This is an observational study to ascertain the potential of newer genomic sequencing platforms, such as the Illumina MiSeq instrument, to provide accurate HIV drug resistance genotypes for hundreds of samples simultaneously. Plasma samples were collected from Canadian patients during routine drug resistance testing (n= 759) and from a Ugandan study cohort (n= 349). Amplicons spanning HIV reverse transcriptase codons 90 to 234 were sequenced with both MiSeq sequencing and conventional Sanger sequencing methods. Sequences were evaluated for nucleotide concordance between methods, using coverage and mixture parameters for quality control. Consensus sequences were also analyzed for disparities in the identification of drug resistance mutations. Sanger and MiSeq sequencing was successful for 881 samples (80%) and 892 samples (81%), respectively, with 832 samples having results from both methods. Most failures were for samples with viral loads of <3.0 log10HIV RNA copies/ml. Overall, 99.3% nucleotide concordance between methods was observed. MiSeq sequencing achieved 97.4% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity in detecting resistance mutations identified by Sanger sequencing. Findings suggest that the Illumina MiSeq platform can yield high-quality data with a high-multiplex “wide” sequencing approach. This strategy can be used for multiple HIV subtypes, demonstrating the potential for widespread individual testing and annual population surveillance in resource-limited settings.

scholarly journals Transmitted Drug Resistance in Treatment-naïve HIV-Infected VCT clients in Taiwan, 2007–2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S423-S424
Author(s):  
Hung-Chin Tsai ◽  
I-Tzu Chen ◽  
Susan Shin-Jung Lee ◽  
Yao-Shen Chen
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Resistance Mutation ◽  
Resistance Testing ◽  
Transmitted Drug Resistance ◽  
Drug Resistance Testing ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hiv 1 ◽  
Level Resistance

Abstract Background The transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 strains might compromise the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment. The aim of this study was to monitor the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in Taiwan, where free highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was provided since 1997. Methods A cohort study on TDR was conducted in antiretroviral therapy -naïve HIV-1 ¡Vinfected voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clients from 2007 to 2016 in southern Taiwan. Genotypic drug resistance testing to PR/RT (pol gene) were determined by ViroSeqTM system and drug resistance testing to integrase inhibitors (INSTI) was done by in house PCR. Antiretroviral resistance was interpreted using the HIVdb program of the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. The patients classified as having low-level resistance, intermediate resistance and high-level resistance were defined as having drug resistance. Resistance-associated mutations were defined by the presence of at least one mutation included in the 2017 drug resistance mutation list of the International AIDS Society-USA consensus guidelines. Results A total of 29384 individuals received a free HIV anonymously screening test during 2007 to 2016. The positive rate for HIV-1 infection was 2%. Sequences were obtained from 407 individuals, of whom 90% were infected by MSM, and 10% were infected by heterosexually. Subtype B HIV-1 strains were found in 97%, subtype C in 0.3% and subtype CRF01_AE in 2.7%. A total of 6% was found to harbor drug resistance strains. The most common NRTI resistance associated mutation was D67N, M184V, K219N, Y118I and T215S/P. The most common NNRTI resistance associated mutation was Y181C, K103N, V179D and Y318F. No any one harbored resistance to INSTI inhibitors (n = 188). Conclusion The resistance prevalence (6%) in this study supported the WHO guideline to prescribe pol resistance testing before initiation of HAART therapy in the treatment naïve patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document