scholarly journals Evaluation of Self-Collected Glans and Rectal Swabs from Men Who Have Sex with Men for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1657-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Moncada ◽  
J. Schachter ◽  
S. Liska ◽  
C. Shayevich ◽  
J. D. Klausner
Sexual Health ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basil Donovan ◽  
Wayne Dimech ◽  
Hammad Ali ◽  
Rebecca Guy ◽  
Margaret Hellard

Background Gonorrhoea notifications have been increasing in Australia’s cities, in both men and women. We investigated if this could be, at least in part, a result of a testing artefact. Methods: We surveyed 28 laboratories that were known to test for both Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) to determine their testing and reporting practices, and when these practices were instituted. Results: By 2012, 23 (82%) of the laboratories were routinely performing duplex nucleic acid amplification tests for both CT and NG even if a test for only one organism was requested, up from 9 (32%) laboratories before 2007. Although written reports of negative NG tests were not provided if the test was not requested, positive NG tests were always communicated to the attending clinician. Conclusions: The move towards routine duplex testing for CT and NG has probably resulted in more Australians being tested for NG than ever before. While this change has advantages for case-finding and improved public health outcomes, it also brings an increasing potential for false-positive NG tests. Recent trends in NG notifications should be interpreted with caution.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarika Pattanasin ◽  
Eileen F Dunne ◽  
Punneeporn Wasinrapee ◽  
Jaray Tongtoyai ◽  
Wannee Chonwattana ◽  
...  

We report positivity rates of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection at each anatomic site among asymptomatic men who have sex with men (MSM). We calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) to detect CT and NG infection at each anatomic site. From 2006 to 2010, we enrolled Thai MSM, age ≥ 18 years into the Bangkok MSM Cohort Study. Participants underwent physical examination and had rectal, urethral, and pharyngeal screening for CT and NG infection using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Of 1744 enrollees, 1696 (97.2%) had no symptoms of CT and NG infection. The positivity rates of CT and NG infection at any site were 14.3% (rectum, urethra, pharynx) and 6.4% (rectum, urethra), respectively. The NNS to detect rectal CT and rectal NG infections was 10 and 16, respectively (p < 0.05). For urethral infection, the NNS of CT was lower than the NNS of NG (22, 121: p < 0.05). The lowest NNS found for rectal CT infection was in HIV-infected MSM (6, 5–8). Asymptomatic CT and NG infection were common among MSM in Bangkok, Thailand and frequently detected in the rectum. In setting where screening in all specimens using NAAT is not feasible, rectal screening should be a priority.


Author(s):  
Barbara Van Der Pol ◽  
Max Chernesky ◽  
Charlotte A. Gaydos ◽  
Edward W. Hook ◽  
Ajith M. Joseph ◽  
...  

Research using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have repeatedly found rectal and oropharyngeal infections with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to be common and potentially more difficult to treat than genital infections. Unfortunately, public health and patient care efforts have been hampered by the lack of FDA-cleared NAATs with claims for anorectal or oropharyngeal samples. At the time of the initiation of this study, no commercially available assays had these claims. We formed a novel partnership among academic institutions and diagnostic manufacturers to address this public health need. From May 2018 through August 2019 we recruited 1108 women, 1256 men and 26 transgender persons each of whom provided 3 anal and 3 oropharyngeal swab specimens. The 3 anal swabs were pooled into a single transport tube as were the 3 oropharyngeal swabs. The performance of each of three study assays was estimated by comparison to the composite result and relative to one another. Percent positivity for chlamydia was 5.9 and 1.2% from anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively compared to 4.2 and 4.1% for gonorrhea. Sensitivity for chlamydia detection ranged from 81.0-95.1% and 82.8-100% for anal and oropharyngeal specimens, respectively. Gonorrhea sensitivity ranged from 85.9-99.0% and 74.0-100% for anal and oropharyngeal samples, respectively. Specificity estimates were ≥ 98.9% for all assays, organisms and sample types. Although there was heterogeneity between sensitivity estimates, these assays offer better ability to detect extra genital infections than culture and potential solutions for providing appropriate sexual healthcare for populations in which these infections are of concern.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document