scholarly journals The Majority of Duck Hepatitis B Virus Reverse Transcriptase in Cells Is Nonencapsidated and Is Bound to a Cytoplasmic Structure

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (18) ◽  
pp. 8648-8657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ermei Yao ◽  
Yunhao Gong ◽  
Nanhai Chen ◽  
John E. Tavis

ABSTRACT The hepadnavirus reverse transcriptase binds cotranslationally to the viral pregenomic RNA. This ribonucleoprotein complex is then encapsidated into nascent viral core particles, where the reverse transcriptase copies the viral RNA into DNA. Here we report that 75% of the duck hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase present in transfected LMH cells does not follow this well-known pathway but rather exists in the cell separate from the core protein or nucleocapsids. The nonencapsidated reverse transcriptase is also abundant in infected duck liver. The nonencapsidated reverse transcriptase exists as a complex set of isoforms that are most likely produced by posttranslational modification. Interestingly, only the smallest of these isoforms is encapsidated into viral core particles. The nonencapsidated reverse transcriptase is bound to a large cellular cytoplasmic structure(s) in a detergent-sensitive complex. The cellular distribution of the reverse transcriptase only partially overlaps that of the core protein, and this distribution is unaffected by blocking encapsidation. These observations raise the possibilities that the metabolic fate of the reverse transcriptase may be posttranscriptionally regulated and that the reverse transcriptase may have roles in the viral replication cycle beyond its well-known function in copying the viral genome.

2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 1368-1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Cao ◽  
Catherine A. Scougall ◽  
Allison R. Jilbert ◽  
John E. Tavis

ABSTRACT The duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) pregenomic RNA is a bicistronic mRNA encoding the core and polymerase proteins. Thirteen AUGs (C2 to C14) and 10 stop codons (S1 to S10) are located between the C1 AUG for the core protein and the P1 AUG that initiates polymerase translation. We previously found that the translation of the DHBV polymerase is initiated by ribosomal shunting. Here, we assessed the biosynthetic events after shunting. Translation of the polymerase open reading frame was found to initiate at the C13, C14, and P1 AUGs. Initiation at the C13 AUG occurred through ribosomal shunting because translation from this codon was cap dependent but was insensitive to blocking ribosomal scanning internally in the message. C13 and C14 are in frame with P1, and translation from these upstream start codons led to the production of larger isoforms of P. We named these isoforms “pre-P” by analogy to the pre-C and pre-S regions of the core and surface antigen open reading frames. Pre-P was produced in DHBV16 and AusDHBV-infected duck liver and was predicted to exist in 80% of avian hepadnavirus strains. Pre-P was not encapsidated into DHBV core particles, and the viable strain DHBV3 cannot make pre-P, so it is not essential for viral replication. Surprisingly, we found that pre-P is an N-linked glycoprotein that is secreted into the medium of cultured cells. These data indicate that DHBV produces an additional protein that has not been previously reported. Identifying the role of pre-P may improve our understanding of the biology of DHBV infection.


2004 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 3353-3360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Cao ◽  
John E. Tavis

It was recently found that the Duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) reverse transcriptase is primarily a non-encapsidated cytoplasmic molecule that is rapidly translated and has a very short half-life. Here, a non-encapsidated reverse transcriptase from the human Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was characterized. HBV polymerase accumulated in the cytoplasm in a manner similar to non-encapsidated DHBV polymerase. However, the HBV polymerase accumulated at an apparently lower concentration and had a longer half-life than the DHBV enzyme, and it displayed no evidence of the post-translational modifications observed for DHBV. Unlike the DHBV polymerase, immunofluorescence detection of the HBV polymerase in cells was suppressed by the core protein, and this suppression occurred independently of encapsidation. This implies an interaction between the polymerase and core in addition to encapsidation, but the polymerase and core did not co-immunoprecipitate, so the interaction might not be direct. These data indicate that production of cytoplasmic, non-encapsidated polymerase is conserved among the hepadnaviral genera. Furthermore, conservation of the cytoplasmic form of the polymerase suggests that it might have function(s) in virus replication or pathology beyond copying the viral genome.


Hepatology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz von Weizsäcker ◽  
Josef Köck ◽  
Stefan Wieland ◽  
Wolf-Bernhard Offensperger ◽  
Hubert E. Blum

Virology ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 242-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Liu ◽  
Lynn D. Condreay ◽  
John B.E. Burch ◽  
William Mason

Virology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 353 (2) ◽  
pp. 443-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haitao Guo ◽  
Carol E. Aldrich ◽  
Jeffry Saputelli ◽  
Chunxiao Xu ◽  
William S. Mason

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (24) ◽  
pp. 11447-11455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianming Hu ◽  
Dana Anselmo

ABSTRACT Reverse transcription in hepatitis B viruses is initiated through a unique protein priming mechanism whereby the viral reverse transcriptase (RT) first assembles into a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex with its RNA template and then initiates DNA synthesis de novo using the RT itself as a protein primer. RNP formation and protein priming require the assistance of host cell factors, including the molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). To better understand the mechanism of RT activation by Hsp90, we have now mapped the minimal RT sequences of the duck hepatitis B virus that are required for chaperone binding, RNP formation, and protein priming. Furthermore, we have reconstituted in vitro both RNP formation and protein priming using purified RT proteins and host factors. Our results show that (i) Hsp90 recognizes two independent domains of the RT, both of which are necessary for RNP formation and protein priming; (ii) Hsp90 function is required not only to establish, but also to maintain, the RT in a state competent for RNA binding; and (iii) Hsp90 is not required during RT synthesis and can activate the RT posttranslationally. Based on these findings, we propose a model for Hsp90 function whereby the chaperone acts as an active interdomain bridge to bring the two RT domains into a poised but labile conformation competent for RNP formation. It is anticipated that the reconstitution system established here will facilitate the isolation of additional host factors required for RT functions and further elucidation of the mechanisms of RT activation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 278 (30) ◽  
pp. 28123-28129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Köck ◽  
Michael Kann ◽  
Gerhard Pütz ◽  
Hubert E. Blum ◽  
Fritz von Weizsäcker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document