scholarly journals The Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-LP Protein Preferentially Coactivates EBNA2-Mediated Stimulation of Latent Membrane Proteins Expressed from the Viral Divergent Promoter

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 4492-4505 ◽  
Author(s):  
RongSheng Peng ◽  
Stephanie C. Moses ◽  
Jie Tan ◽  
Elisabeth Kremmer ◽  
Paul D. Ling
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Type I ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Cell Immortalization ◽  
Cellular Cofactor ◽  
Epstein Barr ◽  
Transformed Cell Lines ◽  
Stimulation Of

ABSTRACT The mechanistic contribution of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA-LP protein to B-cell immortalization remains an enigma. However, previous studies have indicated that EBNA-LP may contribute to immortalization by enhancing EBNA2-mediated transcriptional activation of the LMP-1 gene. To gain further insight into the potential role EBNA-LP has in EBV-mediated B-cell immortalization, we asked whether it is a global or gene-specific coactivator of EBNA2 and whether coactivation requires interaction between these proteins. In type I Burkitt's lymphoma cells, we found that EBNA-LP strongly coactivated EBNA2 stimulation of LMP-1 and LMP2B RNAs, which are expressed from the viral divergent promoter. Surprisingly, the viral LMP2A gene and cellular CD21 and Hes-1 genes were induced by EBNA2 but showed no further induction after EBNA-LP coexpression. We also found that EBNA-LP did not stably interact with EBNA2 in coimmunoprecipitation assays, even though the conditions were adequate to observe specific interactions between EBNA2 and its cellular cofactor, CBF1. Colocalization between EBNA2 and EBNA-LP was not detectable in EBV-transformed cell lines or transfected type I Burkitt's cells. Finally, no significant interactions between EBNA2 and EBNA-LP were found with mammalian two-hybrid assays. From this data, we conclude that EBNA-LP is not a global coactivator of EBNA2 targets, but it preferentially coactivates EBNA2 stimulation of the viral divergent promoter. While this may require specific transient interactions between these proteins that only occur in the context of the divergent promoter, our data strongly suggest that EBNA-LP also cooperates with EBNA2 through mechanisms that do not require direct or indirect complex formation between these proteins.

scholarly journals Structural, Functional, and Genetic Comparisons of Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 3A, 3B, and 3C Homologues Encoded by the Rhesus Lymphocryptovirus

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (13) ◽  
pp. 5921-5932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Jiang ◽  
Young-gyu Cho ◽  
Fred Wang
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Latent Infection ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Cell Immortalization ◽  
Epstein Barr

ABSTRACT EBNA-3A, -3B, and -3C are three latent infection nuclear proteins important for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-induced B-cell immortalization and the immune response to EBV infection. All three are hypothesized to function as transcriptional transactivators, but little is known about their precise mechanism of action or their role in EBV pathogenesis. We have cloned and studied the three EBNA-3 homologues from a closely related lymphocryptovirus (LCV) which naturally infects rhesus monkeys. The rhesus LCV EBNA-3A, -3B, and -3C homologues have 37, 40, and 36% amino acid identity with the EBV genes, respectively. Function, as measured by in vitro assays, also appears to be conserved with the EBV genes, since the rhesus LCV EBNA-3s can interact with the transcription factor RBP-Jκ and the rhesus LCV EBNA-3C encodes a Q/P-rich domain with transcriptional activation properties. In order to better understand the relationship between these EBV and rhesus LCV latent infection genes, we asked if the rhesus LCV EBNA-3 locus could be recombined into the EBV genome and if it could substitute for the EBV EBNA-3s when assayed for human B-cell immortalization. Recombination between the EBV genome and rhesus LCV DNA was reasonably efficient. However, these studies suggest that the rhesus LCV EBNA-3 locus was not completely interchangeable with the EBV EBNA-3 locus for B-cell immortalization and that at least one determinant of the species restriction for LCV-induced B-cell immortalization maps to the EBNA-3 locus. The overall conservation of EBNA-3 structure and function between EBV and rhesus LCV indicates that rhesus LCV infection of rhesus monkeys can provide an important animal model for studying the role of the EBNA-3 genes in LCV pathogenesis.

scholarly journals Limited nucleotide pools restrict Epstein–Barr virus-mediated B-cell immortalization

Oncogenesis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e349-e349 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Y Hafez ◽  
J E Messinger ◽  
K McFadden ◽  
G Fenyofalvi ◽  
C N Shepard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Nucleotide Pools ◽  
Cell Immortalization ◽  
Epstein Barr

scholarly journals Deletion of Epstein-Barr Virus Regulatory Sequences Upstream of the EBNA Gene Promoter Wp1 Is Unfavorable for B-Cell Immortalization

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (22) ◽  
pp. 11763-11769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina I. Yoo ◽  
Josh Woloszynek ◽  
Steven Templeton ◽  
Samuel H. Speck
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Recombinant Viruses ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Cell Immortalization ◽  
Epstein Barr ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Transcription of the six Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA genes is coordinately regulated, being driven by either the Cp promoter, which is encoded within the unique region just upstream of the EBV major internal repeat (IR-1), or by the Wp promoter, which is encoded within the IR-1 repeat and thus present in multiple copies. Previous analyses of Cp- and Wp-initiated transcription have identified a shared cis-regulatory element mapping to the region extending from −169 to −369 bp upstream of the Wp transcription initiation site (M. T. Puglielli, N. Desai, and S. H. Speck, J. Virol. 71:120-128, 1997). To assess the impact of this regulatory region on Cp and Wp activity in the context of the viral genome, we attempted to delete this regulatory region upstream of the first copy of Wp (Wp1). While 10 recombinant viruses were obtained in which this deletion was incorporated in the interior of the IR-1 repeat, only a single lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) immortalized by a recombinant EBV harboring the deletion upstream of Wp1 was recovered. In contrast, using a control targeting vector in which the Wp regulatory sequences were intact but which contained a sequence tag within the W0 exon, we demonstrated that of the five recombinant viruses analyzed in which the crossover event had occurred upstream of the Wp sequence tag, four had incorporated the tagged sequences into Wp1 of the virus. Taken together, these results indicate that deletion of the regulatory sequences from −369 to −169 bp upstream of Wp1 is unfavorable for EBV-driven B-cell immortalization but is tolerated within the interior of the IR-1 repeat. Analysis of promoter usage in the clone 9-60 LCL, in which the W enhancer sequences were deleted upstream of Wp1, revealed the following: (i) the level of Cp-initiated transcription was significantly diminished compared to that of wild-type LCLs; (ii) the decreased Cp-initiated transcription was not efficiently compensated by transcription initiation from Wp1; and (iii) transcription initiation from downstream Wp promoters was detectable. This is the first report of an LCL in which transcription initiation from a Wp downstream of Wp1 has been documented.

scholarly journals Molecular virology of Epstein–Barr virus

2001 ◽  
Vol 356 (1408) ◽  
pp. 437-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg W. Bornkamm ◽  
Wolfgang Hammerschmidt
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Genetic System ◽  
Lytic Cycle ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Cell Immortalization ◽  
Epstein Barr

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) interacts with its host in three distinct ways in a highly regulated fashion: (i) EBV infects human B lymphocytes and induces proliferation of the infected cells, (ii) it enters into a latent phase in vivo that follows the proliferative phase, and (iii) it can be reactivated giving rise to the production of infectious progeny for reinfection of cells of the same type or transmission of the virus to another individual. In healthy people, these processes take place simultaneously in different anatomical and functional compartments and are linked to each other in a highly dynamic steady–state equilibrium. The development of a genetic system has paved the way for the dissection of those processes at a molecular level that can be studied in vitro , i.e. B–cell immortalization and the lytic cycle leading to production of infectious progeny. Polymerase chain reaction analyses coupled to fluorescent–activated cell sorting has on the other hand allowed a descriptive analysis of the virus–host interaction in peripheral blood cells as well as in tonsillar B cells in vivo . This paper is aimed at compiling our present knowledge on the process of B–cell immortalization in vitro as well as in vivo latency, and attempts to integrate this knowledge into the framework of the viral life cycle in vivo .

scholarly journals IRF-7, a new interferon regulatory factor associated with Epstein-Barr virus latency.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 5748-5757 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Zhang ◽  
J S Pagano
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Type I ◽  
Blood Leukocytes ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Virus Latency ◽  
Restricted Type ◽  
Epstein Barr

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) BamHI Q promoter (Qp) is the only promoter used for the transcription of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) mRNA in cells in the most restricted (type I) latent infection state. However, Qp is inactive in type III latency. With the use of the yeast one-hybrid system, a new cellular gene has been identified that encodes proteins which bind to sequence in Qp. The deduced amino acid sequence of the gene has significant homology to the interferon regulatory factors (IRFs). This new gene and products including two splicing variants are designated IRF-7A, IRF-7B, and IRF-7C. The expression of IRF-7 is predominantly in spleen, thymus, and peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL). IRF-7 proteins were identified in primary PBL with specific antiserum against IRF-7B protein. IRF-7s can bind to interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) sequence and repress transcriptional activation by both interferon and IRF-1. Additionally, a functional viral ISRE sequence, 5'-GCGAAAACGAAAGT-3', has been identified in Qp. Finally, the expression of IRF-7 is consistently high in type III latency cells and almost undetectable in type I latency, corresponding to the activity of endogenous Qp in these latency states and the ability of the IRF-7 proteins to repress Qp-reporter constructs. The identification of a functional viral ISRE and association of IRF-7 with type III latency may be relevant to the mechanism of regulation of Qp.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document