scholarly journals A Novel Small-Subunit Processome Assembly Intermediate That Contains the U3 snoRNP, Nucleolin, RRP5, and DBP4

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3007-3017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Jane Turner ◽  
Andrew Alexander Knox ◽  
José-Luis Prieto ◽  
Brian McStay ◽  
Nicholas James Watkins

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic 18S rRNA processing is mediated by the small subunit (SSU) processome, a machine comprised of the U3 small nucleolar RNP (U3 snoRNP), tUTP, bUTP, MPP10, and BMS1/RCL1 subcomplexes. We report that the human SSU processome is a dynamic structure with the recruitment and release of subcomplexes occurring during the early stages of ribosome biogenesis. A novel 50S U3 snoRNP accumulated when either pre-rRNA transcription was blocked or the tUTP proteins were depleted. This complex did not contain the tUTP, bUTP, MPP10, and BMS1/RCL1 subcomplexes but was associated with the RNA-binding proteins nucleolin and RRP5 and the RNA helicase DBP4. Our data suggest that the 50S U3 snoRNP is an SSU assembly intermediate that is likely recruited to the pre-rRNA through the RNA-binding proteins nucleolin and RRP5. We predict that nucleolin is only transiently associated with the SSU processome and likely leaves the complex not long after 50S U3 snoRNP recruitment. The nucleolin-binding site potentially overlaps that of several other key factors, and we propose that this protein must leave the SSU processome for pre-rRNA processing to occur.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3068
Author(s):  
Zaira M. López-Juárez ◽  
Laura Aguilar-Henonin ◽  
Plinio Guzmán

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key elements involved in post-transcriptional regulation. Ataxin-2 (ATXN2) is an evolutionarily conserved RBP protein, whose function has been studied in several model organisms, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the Homo sapiens. ATXN2 interacts with poly(A) binding proteins (PABP) and binds to specific sequences at the 3′UTR of target mRNAs to stabilize them. CTC-Interacting Domain3 (CID3) and CID4 are two ATXN2 orthologs present in plant genomes whose function is unknown. In the present study, phenotypical and transcriptome profiling were used to examine the role of CID3 and CID4 in Arabidopsis thaliana. We found that they act redundantly to influence pathways throughout the life cycle. cid3cid4 double mutant showed a delay in flowering time and a reduced rosette size. Transcriptome profiling revealed that key factors that promote floral transition and floral meristem identity were downregulated in cid3cid4 whereas the flowering repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) was upregulated. Expression of key factors in the photoperiodic regulation of flowering and circadian clock pathways, were also altered in cid3cid4, as well as the expression of several transcription factors and miRNAs encoding genes involved in leaf growth dynamics. These findings reveal that ATXN2 orthologs may have a role in developmental pathways throughout the life cycle of plants.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 6547-6556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica A. Champion ◽  
Bennett H. Lane ◽  
Meredith E. Jackrel ◽  
Lynne Regan ◽  
Susan J. Baserga

ABSTRACT The small subunit (SSU) processome is a ribosome biogenesis intermediate that assembles from its subcomplexes onto the pre-18S rRNA with yet unknown order and structure. Here, we investigate the architecture of the UtpB subcomplex of the SSU processome, focusing on the interaction between the half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat (HAT) domain of Utp6 and a specific peptide in Utp21. We present a comprehensive map of the interactions within the UtpB subcomplex and further show that the N-terminal domain of Utp6 interacts with Utp18 while the HAT domain interacts with Utp21. Using a panel of point and deletion mutants of Utp6, we show that an intact HAT domain is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing and cell growth. Further investigation of the Utp6-Utp21 interaction using both genetic and biophysical methods shows that the HAT domain binds a specific peptide ligand in Utp21, the first example of a HAT domain peptide ligand, with a dissociation constant of 10 μM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S21-S21
Author(s):  
Andrey Buyan ◽  
Ivan Kulakovskiy ◽  
Sergey Dmitriev

Background: The ribosome is a protein-synthesizing molecular machine composed of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and dozens of ribosomal proteins. In mammals, the ribosome has a complicated structure with an additional outer layer of rRNA, including large tentacle-like extensions. A number of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) interact with this layer to assist ribosome biogenesis, nuclear export and decay, or to modulate translation. Plenty of methods have been developed in the last decade in order to study such protein-RNA interactions, including RNA pulldown and crosslinking-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) assays. Methods: In the current study, using publicly available data of the enhanced CLIP (eCLIP) experiments for 223 proteins studied in the ENCODE project, we found a number of RBPs that bind rRNAs in human cells. To locate their binding sites in rRNAs, we used a newly developed computational protocol for mapping and evaluation of the eCLIP data with the respect to the repetitive sequences. Results: For two proteins with known ribosomal localization, uS3/RPS3 and uS17/RPS11, the identified sites were in good agreement with structural data, thus validating our approach. Then, we identified rRNA contacts of overall 22 RBPs involved in rRNA processing and ribosome maturation (DDX21, DDX51, DDX52, NIP7, SBDS, UTP18, UTP3, WDR3, and WDR43), translational control during stress (SERBP1, G3BP1, SND1), IRES activity (PCBP1/hnRNPE1), and other translation-related functions. In many cases, the identified proteins interact with the rRNA expansion segments (ES) of the human ribosome pointing to their important role in protein synthesis. Conclusion: Our study identifies a number of RBPs as interacting partners of the human ribosome and sheds light on the role of rRNA expansion segments in translation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hyun Park ◽  
Hyung-Sae im ◽  
Prakash Jyoti Kalita ◽  
Sang-Bong Choi

Abstract Background: Pumilio RNA-binding proteins are evolutionarily conserved throughout all eukaryotes and are involved in RNA decay, transport, and translation repression in the cytoplasm. Even though a majority of Pumilio proteins function in the cytoplasm, two nucleolar forms have been reported to have a function in rRNA processing in Arabidopsis. Chara is known to be most closely related to land plants as it shares several characteristics with modern embryophytes. Results: In this study, we identified two putative nucleolar Pumilio protein genes, ChPUM2 and ChPUM3 , from the transcriptome of Chara corallina . Of the two ChPUM proteins, ChPUM2 was the most similar to Arabidopsis APUM23 in the amino acid sequence (27% identity and 45% homology) and the predicted protein structure, while ChPUM3 was similar to APUM24 (35% identity and 54% homology). The transient expression of 35S:ChPUM2-RFP and 35S:ChPUM3-RFP showed nucleolar localization of fusion proteins in tobacco leaf cells, similar to the expression of APUM23-GFP and APUM24-GFP. Moreover, 35S:ChPUM2 complemented the morphological defects of the apum23 phenotypes but not those of apum24, while 35S:ChPUM3 could not complement the apum23 and apum24 mutants. Similarly, the 35S:ChPUM2/apum23 plants rescued the pre-rRNA processing defect of apum23 , but 35S:ChPUM3/apum24 +/- plants did not rescue that of apum24 . Consistent with these complementation results, a known target RNA-binding sequence at the end of the 18S rRNA (5'-GAAUUGACGG) for APUM23 was conserved in Arabidopsis and Chara, whereas a target region of ITS2 pre-rRNA for APUM24 was 156 nt longer in Chara than in Arabidopsis. Moreover, ChPUM2 and APUM23 were predicted to have nearly identical structures, but ChPUM3 and APUM24 have different structures in the 5th C-terminal Puf RNA-binding domain as ChPUM3 has a long random coil in this domain. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ChPUM2 has evolutionarily maintained functions in Arabidopsis, while ChPUM3 is not functional in Arabidopsis, most likely due to the long target ITS2 sequence of Arabidopsis and the distinct tertiary structure from Arabidopsis homologue APUM24.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-918
Author(s):  
Xian Du ◽  
Rui Xiao

Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) are well-established key factors orchestrating gene transcription, and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are mainly thought to participate in post-transcriptional control of gene. In fact, these two steps are functionally coupled, offering a possibility for reciprocal communications between transcription and regulatory RNAs and RBPs. Recently, a series of exploratory studies, utilizing functional genomic strategies, have revealed that RBPs are prevalently involved in transcription control genome-wide through their interactions with chromatin. Here, we present a refined census of RBPs to grope for such an emerging role and discuss the global view of RBP–chromatin interactions and their functional diversities in transcription regulation.


2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 1619-1626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Jennifer E. G. Gallagher ◽  
Brianna M. Mitchell ◽  
Sander Granneman ◽  
Susan J. Baserga

ABSTRACT The small-subunit (SSU) processome is a large ribonucleoprotein required for the biogenesis of the 18S rRNA and likely corresponds to the terminal knobs visualized by electron microscopy on the 5′ end of nascent rRNAs. The original purification of the SSU processome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in the identification of 28 proteins. Here, we characterize 12 additional protein components, including five small-ribosomal-subunit proteins (Rps4, Rps6, Rps7, Rps9, and Rps14) that had previously been copurified. Our multiple criteria for including a component as a bona fide SSU processome component included coimmunoprecipitation with Mpp10 (an SSU processome component), the U3 snoRNA, and the anticipated pre-rRNAs. Importantly, the association of specific ribosomal proteins with the SSU processome suggests that the SSU processome has roles in both pre-rRNA processing and ribosome assembly. These ribosomal proteins may be analogous to the primary or secondary RNA binding proteins first described in bacterial in vitro ribosome assembly maps. In addition to the ribosomal proteins and based on the same experimental approach, we found seven other proteins (Utp18, Noc4, Utp20, Utp21, Utp22, Emg1, and Krr1) to be bona fide SSU processome proteins.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hyun Park ◽  
Hyung-Sae Kim ◽  
Prakash Jyoti Kalita ◽  
Sang-Bong Choi

Abstract Background: Pumilio RNA-binding proteins are evolutionarily conserved throughout eukaryotes and are involved in RNA decay, transport, and translation repression in the cytoplasm. Although a majority of Pumilio proteins function in the cytoplasm, two nucleolar forms have been reported to have a function in rRNA processing in Arabidopsis. The species of the genus Chara have been known to be most closely related to land plants, as they share several characteristics with modern Embryophyta. Results: In this study, we identified two putative nucleolar Pumilio protein genes, namely, ChPUM2 and ChPUM3, from the transcriptome of Chara corallina. Of the two ChPUM proteins, ChPUM2 was most similar in amino acid sequence (27% identity and 45% homology) and predicted protein structure to Arabidopsis APUM23, while ChPUM3 was similar to APUM24 (35% identity and 54% homology). The transient expression of 35S:ChPUM2-RFP and 35S:ChPUM3-RFP showed nucleolar localization of fusion proteins in tobacco leaf cells, similar to the expression of 35S:APUM23-GFP and 35S:APUM24-GFP. Moreover, 35S:ChPUM2 complemented the morphological defects of the apum23 phenotypes but not those of apum24, while 35S:ChPUM3 could not complement the apum23 and apum24 mutants. Similarly, the 35S:ChPUM2/apum23 plants rescued the pre-rRNA processing defect of apum23, but 35S:ChPUM3/apum24+/- plants did not rescue that of apum24. Consistent with these complementation results, a known target RNA-binding sequence at the end of the 18S rRNA (5'-GGAAUUGACGG) for APUM23 was conserved in Arabidopsis and C. corallina, whereas a target region of ITS2 pre-rRNA for APUM24 was 156 nt longer in C. corallina than in A. thaliana. Moreover, ChPUM2 and APUM23 were predicted to have nearly identical structures, but ChPUM3 and APUM24 have different structures in the 5th C-terminal Puf RNA-binding domain, which had a longer random coil in ChPUM3 than in APUM24. Conclusions: ChPUM2 of C. corallina was functional in Arabidopsis, similar to APUM23, but ChPUM3 did not substitute for APUM24 in Arabidopsis. Protein homology modeling showed high coverage between APUM23 and ChPUM2, but displayed structural differences between APUM24 and ChPUM3. Together with the protein structure of ChPUM3 itself, a short ITS2 of Arabidopsis pre-rRNA may interrupt the binding of ChPUM3 to 3’-extended 5.8S pre-rRNA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Hyun Park ◽  
Hyung-Sae Kim ◽  
Prakash Jyoti Kalita ◽  
Sang-Bong Choi

Abstract Background: Pumilio RNA-binding proteins are evolutionarily conserved throughout eukaryotes and are involved in RNA decay, transport, and translation repression in the cytoplasm. Although a majority of Pumilio proteins function in the cytoplasm, two nucleolar forms have been reported to have a function in rRNA processing in Arabidopsis. The species of the genus Chara have been known to be most closely related to land plants, as they share several characteristics with modern Embryophyta.Results: In this study, we identified two putative nucleolar Pumilio protein genes, namely, ChPUM2 and ChPUM3, from the transcriptome of Chara corallina. Of the two ChPUM proteins, ChPUM2 was most similar in amino acid sequence (27% identity and 45% homology) and predicted protein structure to Arabidopsis APUM23, while ChPUM3 was similar to APUM24 (35% identity and 54% homology). The transient expression of 35S:ChPUM2-RFP and 35S:ChPUM3-RFP showed nucleolar localization of fusion proteins in tobacco leaf cells, similar to the expression of 35S:APUM23-GFP and 35S:APUM24-GFP. Moreover, 35S:ChPUM2 complemented the morphological defects of the apum23 phenotypes but not those of apum24, while 35S:ChPUM3 could not complement the apum23 and apum24 mutants. Similarly, the 35S:ChPUM2/apum23 plants rescued the pre-rRNA processing defect of apum23, but 35S:ChPUM3/apum24+/- plants did not rescue that of apum24. Consistent with these complementation results, a known target RNA-binding sequence at the end of the 18S rRNA (5'-GGAAUUGACGG) for APUM23 was conserved in Arabidopsis and C. corallina, whereas a target region of ITS2 pre-rRNA for APUM24 was 156 nt longer in C. corallina than in A. thaliana. Moreover, ChPUM2 and APUM23 were predicted to have nearly identical structures, but ChPUM3 and APUM24 have different structures in the 5th C-terminal Puf RNA-binding domain, which had a longer random coil in ChPUM3 than in APUM24.Conclusions: ChPUM2 of C. corallina was functional in Arabidopsis, similar to APUM23, but ChPUM3 did not substitute for APUM24 in Arabidopsis. Protein homology modeling showed high coverage between APUM23 and ChPUM2, but displayed structural differences between APUM24 and ChPUM3. Together with the protein structure of ChPUM3 itself, a short ITS2 of Arabidopsis pre-rRNA may interrupt the binding of ChPUM3 to 3’-extended 5.8S pre-rRNA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document