scholarly journals A Direct Interaction between the Utp6 Half-a-Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain and a Specific Peptide in Utp21 Is Essential for Efficient Pre-rRNA Processing

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 6547-6556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica A. Champion ◽  
Bennett H. Lane ◽  
Meredith E. Jackrel ◽  
Lynne Regan ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat ◽  
Peptide Ligand ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain ◽  
Domain Peptide ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Specific Peptide

ABSTRACT The small subunit (SSU) processome is a ribosome biogenesis intermediate that assembles from its subcomplexes onto the pre-18S rRNA with yet unknown order and structure. Here, we investigate the architecture of the UtpB subcomplex of the SSU processome, focusing on the interaction between the half-a-tetratricopeptide repeat (HAT) domain of Utp6 and a specific peptide in Utp21. We present a comprehensive map of the interactions within the UtpB subcomplex and further show that the N-terminal domain of Utp6 interacts with Utp18 while the HAT domain interacts with Utp21. Using a panel of point and deletion mutants of Utp6, we show that an intact HAT domain is essential for efficient pre-rRNA processing and cell growth. Further investigation of the Utp6-Utp21 interaction using both genetic and biophysical methods shows that the HAT domain binds a specific peptide ligand in Utp21, the first example of a HAT domain peptide ligand, with a dissociation constant of 10 μM.

scholarly journals A Novel Small-Subunit Processome Assembly Intermediate That Contains the U3 snoRNP, Nucleolin, RRP5, and DBP4

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 3007-3017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Jane Turner ◽  
Andrew Alexander Knox ◽  
José-Luis Prieto ◽  
Brian McStay ◽  
Nicholas James Watkins
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Dynamic Structure ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Assembly Intermediate ◽  
Ssu Processome

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic 18S rRNA processing is mediated by the small subunit (SSU) processome, a machine comprised of the U3 small nucleolar RNP (U3 snoRNP), tUTP, bUTP, MPP10, and BMS1/RCL1 subcomplexes. We report that the human SSU processome is a dynamic structure with the recruitment and release of subcomplexes occurring during the early stages of ribosome biogenesis. A novel 50S U3 snoRNP accumulated when either pre-rRNA transcription was blocked or the tUTP proteins were depleted. This complex did not contain the tUTP, bUTP, MPP10, and BMS1/RCL1 subcomplexes but was associated with the RNA-binding proteins nucleolin and RRP5 and the RNA helicase DBP4. Our data suggest that the 50S U3 snoRNP is an SSU assembly intermediate that is likely recruited to the pre-rRNA through the RNA-binding proteins nucleolin and RRP5. We predict that nucleolin is only transiently associated with the SSU processome and likely leaves the complex not long after 50S U3 snoRNP recruitment. The nucleolin-binding site potentially overlaps that of several other key factors, and we propose that this protein must leave the SSU processome for pre-rRNA processing to occur.

scholarly journals The Small Subunit Processome Is Required for Cell Cycle Progression at G1

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 5038-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Relay Cell ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

Without ribosome biogenesis, translation of mRNA into protein ceases and cellular growth stops. We asked whether ribosome biogenesis is cell cycle regulated in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and we determined that it is not regulated in the same manner as in metazoan cells. We therefore turned our attention to cellular sensors that relay cell size information via ribosome biogenesis. Our results indicate that the small subunit (SSU) processome, a complex consisting of 40 proteins and the U3 small nucleolar RNA necessary for ribosome biogenesis, is not mitotically regulated. Furthermore, Nan1/Utp17, an SSU processome protein, does not provide a link between ribosome biogenesis and cell growth. However, when individual SSU processome proteins are depleted, cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This arrest was further supported by the lack of staining for proteins expressed in post-G1. Similarly, synchronized cells depleted of SSU processome proteins did not enter G2. This suggests that when ribosomes are no longer made, the cells stall in the G1. Therefore, yeast cells must grow to a critical size, which is dependent upon having a sufficient number of ribosomes during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, before cell division can occur.

scholarly journals Release of the ribosome biogenesis factor Bud23 from small subunit precursors in yeast

RNA ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. rna.079025.121
Author(s):  
Joshua J Black ◽  
Arlen W Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Assembly Line ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Nucleotide Hydrolysis ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Intermediate States ◽  
Ssu Processome

Ribosomes are the universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes that synthesize proteins. The two subunits of the eukaryotic ribosome are produced through a quasi-independent assembly-line-like pathway involving the hierarchical actions of numerous trans-acting biogenesis factors and the incorporation of ribosomal proteins. The factors work together to shape the nascent subunits through a series of intermediate states into their functional architectures. The earliest intermediate of the small subunit (SSU or 40S) is the SSU Processome which is subsequently transformed into the pre-40S intermediate. This transformation is, in part, facilitated by the binding of the methyltransferase Bud23. How Bud23 is released from the resultant pre-40S is not known. The ribosomal proteins Rps0, Rps2, and Rps21, termed the Rps0-cluster proteins, and several biogenesis factors are known to bind the pre-40S around the time that Bud23 is released, suggesting that one or more of these factors induce Bud23 release. Here, we systematically examined the requirement of these factors for the release of Bud23 from pre-40S particles. We found that the Rps0-cluster proteins are needed but not sufficient for Bud23 release. The atypical kinase/ATPase Rio2 shares a binding site with Bud23 and is thought to be recruited to pre-40S after the Rps0-cluster proteins. Depletion of Rio2 prevented the release of Bud23 from the pre-40S. More importantly, the addition of recombinant Rio2 to pre-40S particles affinity-purified from Rio2-depleted cells was sufficient for Bud23 release in vitro. The ability of Rio2 to displace Bud23 was independent of nucleotide hydrolysis. We propose a novel role for Rio2 in which its binding to the pre-40S actively displaces Bud23 from the pre-40S, and we suggest a model in which the binding of the Rps0-cluster proteins and Rio2 promote the release of Bud23.

scholarly journals Synergistic defects in pre-rRNA processing from mutations in the U3-specific protein Rrp9 and U3 snoRNA

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 3848-3868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Clerget ◽  
Valérie Bourguignon-Igel ◽  
Nathalie Marmier-Gourrier ◽  
Nicolas Rolland ◽  
Ludivine Wacheul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction Network ◽  
18S Rrna ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
U3 Snorna ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction Network

Abstract U3 snoRNA and the associated Rrp9/U3-55K protein are essential for 18S rRNA production by the SSU-processome complex. U3 and Rrp9 are required for early pre-rRNA cleavages at sites A0, A1 and A2, but the mechanism remains unclear. Substitution of Arg 289 in Rrp9 to Ala (R289A) specifically reduced cleavage at sites A1 and A2. Surprisingly, R289 is located on the surface of the Rrp9 β-propeller structure opposite to U3 snoRNA. To understand this, we first characterized the protein-protein interaction network of Rrp9 within the SSU-processome. This identified a direct interaction between the Rrp9 β-propeller domain and Rrp36, the strength of which was reduced by the R289A substitution, implicating this interaction in the observed processing phenotype. The Rrp9 R289A mutation also showed strong synergistic negative interactions with mutations in U3 that destabilize the U3/pre-rRNA base-pair interactions or reduce the length of their linking segments. We propose that the Rrp9 β-propeller and U3/pre-rRNA binding cooperate in the structure or stability of the SSU-processome. Additionally, our analysis of U3 variants gave insights into the function of individual segments of the 5′-terminal 72-nt sequence of U3. We interpret these data in the light of recently reported SSU-processome structures.

scholarly journals snR30/U17 Small Nucleolar Ribonucleoprotein: A Critical Player during Ribosome Biogenesis

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2195
Author(s):  
Timothy John Vos ◽  
Ute Kothe
Keyword(s):  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Ribosome Synthesis ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

The small nucleolar RNA snR30 (U17 in humans) plays a unique role during ribosome synthesis. Unlike most members of the H/ACA class of guide RNAs, the small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) complex assembled on snR30 does not direct pseudouridylation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), but instead snR30 is critical for 18S rRNA processing during formation of the small subunit (SSU) of the ribosome. Specifically, snR30 is essential for three pre-rRNA cleavages at the A0/01, A1/1, and A2/2a sites in yeast and humans, respectively. Accordingly, snR30 is the only essential H/ACA guide RNA in yeast. Here, we summarize our current knowledge about the interactions and functions of snR30, discuss what remains to be elucidated, and present two non-exclusive hypotheses on the possible molecular function of snR30 during ribosome biogenesis. First, snR30 might be responsible for recruiting other proteins including endonucleases to the SSU processome. Second, snR30 may contribute to the refolding of pre-rRNA into a required conformation that serves as a checkpoint during ribosome biogenesis facilitating pre-rRNA cleavage. In both scenarios, the snR30 snoRNP may have scaffolding and RNA chaperoning activity. In conclusion, the snR30 snoRNP is a crucial player with an unknown molecular mechanism during ribosome synthesis, posing many interesting future research questions.

scholarly journals The Putative NTPase Fap7 Mediates Cytoplasmic 20S Pre-rRNA Processing through a Direct Interaction with Rps14

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 10352-10364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Granneman ◽  
Madhusudan R. Nandineni ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Structural Component ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
18S Rrna ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Nucleoside Triphosphate ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Conserved Residues ◽  
Rrna Maturation

ABSTRACT One of the proteins identified as being involved in ribosome biogenesis by high-throughput studies, a putative P-loop-type kinase termed Fap7 (YDL166c), was shown to be required for the conversion of 20S pre-rRNA to 18S rRNA. However, the mechanism underlying this function has remained unclear. Here we demonstrate that Fap7 is strictly required for cleavage of the 20S pre-rRNA at site D in the cytoplasm. Genetic depletion of Fap7 causes accumulation of only the 20S pre-rRNA, which could be detected not only in 43S preribosomes but also in 80S-sized complexes. Fap7 is not a structural component of 43S preribosomes but likely transiently interacts with them by directly binding to Rps14, a ribosomal protein that is found near the 3′ end of the 18S rRNA. Consistent with an NTPase activity, conserved residues predicted to be required for nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) hydrolysis are essential for Fap7 function in vivo. We propose that Fap7 mediates cleavage of the 20S pre-rRNA at site D by directly interacting with Rps14 and speculate that it is an enzyme that functions as an NTP-dependent molecular switch in 18S rRNA maturation.

scholarly journals Esf2p, a U3-Associated Factor Required for Small-Subunit Processome Assembly and Compaction

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 5523-5534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tran Hoang ◽  
Wen-Tao Peng ◽  
Emmanuel Vanrobays ◽  
Nevan Krogan ◽  
Shawna Hiley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Cleavage Sites ◽  
Rrna Processing ◽  
Large Scale Analysis ◽  
Tata Element ◽  
Element Binding Protein ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Processing Factors

ABSTRACT Esf2p is the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of mouse ABT1, a protein previously identified as a putative partner of the TATA-element binding protein. However, large-scale studies have indicated that Esf2p is primarily localized to the nucleolus and that it physically associates with pre-rRNA processing factors. Here, we show that Esf2p-depleted cells are defective for pre-rRNA processing at the early nucleolar cleavage sites A0 through A2 and consequently are inhibited for 18S rRNA synthesis. Esf2p was stably associated with the 5′ external transcribed spacer (ETS) and the box C+D snoRNA U3, as well as additional box C+D snoRNAs and proteins enriched within the small-subunit (SSU) processome/90S preribosomes. Esf2p colocalized on glycerol gradients with 90S preribosomes and slower migrating particles containing 5′ ETS fragments. Strikingly, upon Esf2p depletion, chromatin spreads revealed that SSU processome assembly and compaction are inhibited and glycerol gradient analysis showed that U3 remains associated within 90S preribosomes. This suggests that in the absence of proper SSU processome assembly, early pre-rRNA processing is inhibited and U3 is not properly released from the 35S pre-rRNAs. The identification of ABT1 in a large-scale analysis of the human nucleolar proteome indicates that its role may also be conserved in mammals.

scholarly journals Release of the ribosome biogenesis factor Bud23 from small subunit precursors in yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J Black ◽  
Arlen W Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Assembly Line ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Nucleotide Hydrolysis ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Intermediate States ◽  
Ssu Processome

Ribosomes are the universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes that synthesize proteins. The two subunits of the eukaryotic ribosome are produced through a quasi-independent assembly-line-like pathway involving the hierarchical actions of numerous trans-acting biogenesis factors and the incorporation of ribosomal proteins. The factors work together to shape the nascent subunits through a series of intermediate states into their functional architectures. The earliest intermediate of the small subunit (SSU or 40S) is the SSU Processome which is subsequently transformed into the pre-40S intermediate. This transformation is, in part, facilitated by the binding of the methyltransferase Bud23. How Bud23 is released from the resultant pre-40S is not known. The ribosomal proteins Rps0, Rps2, and Rps21, termed the Rps0-cluster proteins, and several biogenesis factors are known to bind the pre-40S around the time that Bud23 is released, suggesting that one or more of these factors induce Bud23 release. Here, we systematically examined the requirement of these factors for the release of Bud23 from pre-40S particles. We found that the Rps0-cluster proteins are needed but not sufficient for Bud23 release. The atypical kinase/ATPase Rio2 shares a binding site with Bud23 and is thought to be recruited to pre-40S after the Rps0-cluster proteins. Depletion of Rio2 prevented the release of Bud23 from the pre-40S. More importantly, the addition of recombinant Rio2 to pre-40S particles affinity-purified from Rio2-depleted cells was sufficient for Bud23 release in vitro. The ability of Rio2 to displace Bud23 was independent of nucleotide hydrolysis. We propose a novel role for Rio2 in which its binding to the pre-40S actively displaces Bud23 from the pre-40S, and we suggest a model in which the binding of the Rps0-cluster proteins and Rio2 promote the release of Bud23.

scholarly journals Nucleolar proteins Bfr2 and Enp2 interact with DEAD-box RNA helicase Dbp4 in two different complexes

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 3194-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Soltanieh ◽  
Martin Lapensée ◽  
François Dragon
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Rna Helicase ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Specific Protein ◽  
18S Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Dead Box ◽  
Nucleolar Proteins ◽  
U3 Snorna ◽  
Ssu Processome

AbstractDifferent pre-ribosomal complexes are formed during ribosome biogenesis, and the composition of these complexes is highly dynamic. Dbp4, a conserved DEAD-box RNA helicase implicated in ribosome biogenesis, interacts with nucleolar proteins Bfr2 and Enp2. We show that, like Dbp4, Bfr2 and Enp2 are required for the early processing steps leading to the production of 18S ribosomal RNA. We also found that Bfr2 and Enp2 associate with the U3 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), the U3-specific protein Mpp10 and various pre-18S ribosomal RNA species. Thus, we propose that Bfr2, Dbp4 and Enp2 are components of the small subunit (SSU) processome, a large complex of ∼80S. Sucrose gradient sedimentation analyses indicated that Dbp4, Bfr2 and Enp2 sediment in a peak of ∼50S and in a peak of ∼80S. Bfr2, Dbp4 and Enp2 associate together in the 50S complex, which does not include the U3 snoRNA; however, they associate with U3 snoRNA in the 80S complex (SSU processome). Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that U14 snoRNA associates with Dbp4 in the 50S complex, but not with Bfr2 or Enp2. The assembly factor Tsr1 is not part of the ‘50S’ complex, indicating this complex is not a pre-40S ribosome. A combination of experiments leads us to propose that Bfr2, Enp2 and Dbp4 are recruited at late steps during assembly of the SSU processome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document