scholarly journals Stimulation of the mouse rRNA gene promoter by a distal spacer promoter.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 4648-4656 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Paalman ◽  
S L Henderson ◽  
B Sollner-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Transcriptional Terminator ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Enhancer Sequences ◽  
Stimulation Of

We show that the mouse ribosomal DNA (rDNA) spacer promoter acts in vivo to stimulate transcription from a downstream rRNA gene promoter. This augmentation of mammalian RNA polymerase I transcription is observed in transient-transfection experiments with three different rodent cell lines, under noncompetitive as well as competitive transcription conditions, over a wide range of template concentrations, whether or not the enhancer repeats alone stimulate or repress expression from the downstream gene promoter. Stimulation of gene promoter transcription by the spacer promoter requires the rDNA enhancer sequences to be present between the spacer promoter and gene promoter and to be oriented as in native rDNA. Stimulation also requires that the spacer promoter be oriented toward the enhancer and gene promoter. However, stimulation does not correlate with transcription from the spacer promoter because the level of stimulation is not altered by either insertion of a functional mouse RNA polymerase I transcriptional terminator between the spacer promoter and enhancer or replacement with a much more active heterologous polymerase I promoter. Further analysis with a series of mutated spacer promoters indicates that the stimulatory activity does not reside in the major promoter domains but requires the central region of the promoter that has been correlated with enhancer responsiveness in vivo.

Sequences within the spacer region of yeast rRNA cistrons that stimulate 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo mediate RNA polymerase I-dependent promoter and terminator activities

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1243-1254
Author(s):  
R Mestel ◽  
M Yip ◽  
J P Holland ◽  
E Wang ◽  
J Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Deletion Mapping ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Transcriptional Terminator ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Stimulation Of

Sequences within the spacer region of yeast rRNA cistrons stimulate synthesis of the major 35S rRNA precursor in vivo 10- to 30-fold (E. A. Elion and J. R. Warner, Cell 39:663-673, 1984). Spacer sequences that mediate this stimulatory activity are located approximately 2.2 kilobases upstream from sequences that encode the 5' terminus of the 35S rRNA precursor. By utilizing a centromere-containing plasmid carrying a 35S rRNA minigene, a 160-base-pair region of spacer rDNA was identified by deletion mapping that is required for efficient stimulation of 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo. A 22-base-pair sequence, previously shown to support RNA polymerase I-dependent selective initiation of transcription in vitro, was located 15 base pairs upstream from the 3' boundary of the stimulatory region. A 77-base pair region of spacer DNA that mediates transcriptional terminator activity in vivo was identified immediately downstream from the 5' boundary of the stimulatory region. Deletion mutations extending downstream from the 5' boundary of the 160-base-pair stimulatory region simultaneously interfere with terminator activity and stimulation of 35S rRNA synthesis from the minigene. The terminator region supported termination of transcripts initiated by RNA polymerase I in vivo. The organization of sequences that support terminator and promoter activities within the 160-base-pair stimulatory region is similar to the organization of rDNA gene promoters in higher organisms. Possible mechanisms for spacer-sequence-dependent stimulation of yeast 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo are discussed.

scholarly journals Sequences within the spacer region of yeast rRNA cistrons that stimulate 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo mediate RNA polymerase I-dependent promoter and terminator activities.

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1243-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mestel ◽  
M Yip ◽  
J P Holland ◽  
E Wang ◽  
J Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Deletion Mapping ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Transcriptional Terminator ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Stimulation Of

Sequences within the spacer region of yeast rRNA cistrons stimulate synthesis of the major 35S rRNA precursor in vivo 10- to 30-fold (E. A. Elion and J. R. Warner, Cell 39:663-673, 1984). Spacer sequences that mediate this stimulatory activity are located approximately 2.2 kilobases upstream from sequences that encode the 5' terminus of the 35S rRNA precursor. By utilizing a centromere-containing plasmid carrying a 35S rRNA minigene, a 160-base-pair region of spacer rDNA was identified by deletion mapping that is required for efficient stimulation of 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo. A 22-base-pair sequence, previously shown to support RNA polymerase I-dependent selective initiation of transcription in vitro, was located 15 base pairs upstream from the 3' boundary of the stimulatory region. A 77-base pair region of spacer DNA that mediates transcriptional terminator activity in vivo was identified immediately downstream from the 5' boundary of the stimulatory region. Deletion mutations extending downstream from the 5' boundary of the 160-base-pair stimulatory region simultaneously interfere with terminator activity and stimulation of 35S rRNA synthesis from the minigene. The terminator region supported termination of transcripts initiated by RNA polymerase I in vivo. The organization of sequences that support terminator and promoter activities within the 160-base-pair stimulatory region is similar to the organization of rDNA gene promoters in higher organisms. Possible mechanisms for spacer-sequence-dependent stimulation of yeast 35S rRNA synthesis in vivo are discussed.

scholarly journals Sequestration analysis for RNA polymerase I transcription factors with various deletion and point mutations reveals different functional regions of the mouse rRNA gene promoter.

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1486-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Nagamine ◽  
T Kishimoto ◽  
J Aono ◽  
H Kato ◽  
R Kominami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Cell Extract ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Base Substitution ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Null Mutant ◽  
Initiation Reaction ◽  
Polymerase I

We compared the ability of various deletion and substitution mutants of the mouse rRNA gene promoter to bind essential factors required for accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Different amounts of a competitor template were first incubated with a mouse cell extract containing the whole complement of factors and RNA polymerase I, and then a tester template was added for the second incubation. Transcription was started by adding nucleoside triphosphates (one labeled), and the accurate transcripts were determined on a gel. The results indicated that the ability of 5' deletion mutants to sequester essential factors decreased almost concurrently with the impairment of in vitro transcription activity, whereas when the promoter sequence was removed from the 3' side, the transcription activity decreased earlier and more drastically than the sequestration ability. Similar, though not identical, results were obtained by preincubation with fraction D separated on a phosphocellulose column, indicating that the major factor which was sequestered was TFID, the species-dependent transcription initiation factor that binds first to the promoter in the initiation reaction (H. Kato, M. Nagamine, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3418-3427, 1986). Compilation of the data suggests that a region inside the 5' half of the core promoter (-40 to -1) is essential for the binding of TFID. The 3' half of the promoter (-1 to downstream) is not essential for the binding of TFID but is highly important for an efficient transcription initiation. A strong down-mutant with a one-base substitution at -16 (G to A) had a reduced ability to bind to TFID, whereas a null mutant with a single base substitution at -7 (G to A) showed a binding ability similar to that of the wild-type promoter when tested with whole-cell extract. This null mutant, however, could not sequester the TFID well when incubated with fraction D alone, suggesting that the binding of TFID with this mutant is unstable in the absence of another factor(s) present in cell extract. The factor is not TFIA, which binds after TFID, because the addition of fraction A containing TFIA did not cause TFID to bind to the mutant. The availability of different mutants having lesions at different steps of transcription initiation will provide a powerful tool for the dissection of the initiation reaction of the RNA gene.

scholarly journals Recruitment of the Nucleolar Remodeling Complex NoRC Establishes Ribosomal DNA Silencing in Chromatin

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1791-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Strohner ◽  
Attila Németh ◽  
Karl P. Nightingale ◽  
Ingrid Grummt ◽  
Peter B. Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Rdna Transcription ◽  
Transcription Terminator ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACT The rRNA gene cluster consists of multiple transcription units. Half of these are active, while the other half are transcriptionally inactive. Previously, in vivo studies have demonstrated that silencing of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is mediated by the chromatin remodeling NoRC (nucleolar remodeling complex). To explore the mechanisms underlying NoRC-directed silencing of rDNA transcription, we investigated the effect of recombinant NoRC on RNA polymerase I transcription on reconstituted chromatin templates. We show that NoRC interacts with the transcription terminator factor (TTF-I), and this interaction is required both for the binding of TTF-I to its promoter-proximal target site and for the recruitment of NoRC to the promoter. After association with the rDNA promoter, NoRC alters the position of the promoter-bound nucleosome, thereby repressing RNA polymerase I transcription. This NoRC-directed rDNA repression requires the N terminus of histone H4. Repression is effective before preinitiation complex formation and as such is unable to exert an effect upon activated rDNA genes. Furthermore, the early steps of rDNA repression do not depend on DNA and histone modifications. These results reveal an important role for TTF-I in recruiting NoRC to rDNA and an active role for NoRC in the establishment of rDNA silencing.

scholarly journals Factor C*, the specific initiation component of the mouse RNA polymerase I holoenzyme, is inactivated early in the transcription process.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 5010-5021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R P Brun ◽  
K Ryan ◽  
B Sollner-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Critical Distance ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Rdna Transcription ◽  
Transcription Process ◽  
Factor C ◽  
Polymerase I

Factor C* is the component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme (factor C) that allows specific transcriptional initiation on a factor D (SL1)- and UBF-activated rRNA gene promoter. The in vitro transcriptional capacity of a preincubated rDNA promoter complex becomes exhausted very rapidly upon initiation of transcription. This is due to the rapid depletion of C* activity. In contrast, C* activity is not unstable in the absence of transcription, even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). By using 3'dNTPs to specifically halt elongation, C* is seen to remain active through transcription complex assembly, initiation, and the first approximately 37 nucleotides of elongation, but it is inactivated before synthesis proceeds beyond approximately 40 nucleotides. When elongation is halted before this critical distance, the C* remains active and on that template complex, greatly extending the kinetics of transcription and generating manyfold more transcripts than would have been synthesized if elongation had proceeded past the critical distance where C* is inactivated. In complementary in vivo analysis under conditions where C* activity is not replenished, C* activity becomes depleted from cells, but this also occurs only when there is ongoing rDNA transcription. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo, the specific initiation-conferring component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme is used stoichiometrically in the transcription process.

scholarly journals Regulation of Ribosomal RNA Production by RNA Polymerase I: Does Elongation Come First?

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Albert ◽  
Jorge Perez-Fernandez ◽  
Isabelle Léger-Silvestre ◽  
Olivier Gadal
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Genes ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Elongation Factors ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Polymerase I

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) production represents the most active transcription in the cell. Synthesis of the large rRNA precursors (35–47S) can be achieved by up to 150 RNA polymerase I (Pol I) enzymes simultaneously transcribing each rRNA gene. In this paper, we present recent advances made in understanding the regulatory mechanisms that control elongation. Built-in Pol I elongation factors, such as Rpa34/Rpa49 in budding yeast and PAF53/CAST in humans, are instrumental to the extremely high rate of rRNA production per gene. rRNA elongation mechanisms are intrinsically linked to chromatin structure and to the higher-order organization of the rRNA genes (rDNA). Factors such as Hmo1 in yeast and UBF1 in humans are key players in rDNA chromatin structure in vivo. Finally, elongation factors known to regulate messengers RNA production by RNA polymerase II are also involved in rRNA production and work cooperatively with Rpa49 in vivo.

Sequestration analysis for RNA polymerase I transcription factors with various deletion and point mutations reveals different functional regions of the mouse rRNA gene promoter

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1486-1495
Author(s):  
M Nagamine ◽  
T Kishimoto ◽  
J Aono ◽  
H Kato ◽  
R Kominami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Cell Extract ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Base Substitution ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Null Mutant ◽  
Initiation Reaction ◽  
Polymerase I

We compared the ability of various deletion and substitution mutants of the mouse rRNA gene promoter to bind essential factors required for accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Different amounts of a competitor template were first incubated with a mouse cell extract containing the whole complement of factors and RNA polymerase I, and then a tester template was added for the second incubation. Transcription was started by adding nucleoside triphosphates (one labeled), and the accurate transcripts were determined on a gel. The results indicated that the ability of 5' deletion mutants to sequester essential factors decreased almost concurrently with the impairment of in vitro transcription activity, whereas when the promoter sequence was removed from the 3' side, the transcription activity decreased earlier and more drastically than the sequestration ability. Similar, though not identical, results were obtained by preincubation with fraction D separated on a phosphocellulose column, indicating that the major factor which was sequestered was TFID, the species-dependent transcription initiation factor that binds first to the promoter in the initiation reaction (H. Kato, M. Nagamine, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3418-3427, 1986). Compilation of the data suggests that a region inside the 5' half of the core promoter (-40 to -1) is essential for the binding of TFID. The 3' half of the promoter (-1 to downstream) is not essential for the binding of TFID but is highly important for an efficient transcription initiation. A strong down-mutant with a one-base substitution at -16 (G to A) had a reduced ability to bind to TFID, whereas a null mutant with a single base substitution at -7 (G to A) showed a binding ability similar to that of the wild-type promoter when tested with whole-cell extract. This null mutant, however, could not sequester the TFID well when incubated with fraction D alone, suggesting that the binding of TFID with this mutant is unstable in the absence of another factor(s) present in cell extract. The factor is not TFIA, which binds after TFID, because the addition of fraction A containing TFIA did not cause TFID to bind to the mutant. The availability of different mutants having lesions at different steps of transcription initiation will provide a powerful tool for the dissection of the initiation reaction of the RNA gene.

Factor C*, the specific initiation component of the mouse RNA polymerase I holoenzyme, is inactivated early in the transcription process

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 5010-5021
Author(s):  
R P Brun ◽  
K Ryan ◽  
B Sollner-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Critical Distance ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Rdna Transcription ◽  
Transcription Process ◽  
Factor C ◽  
Polymerase I

Factor C* is the component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme (factor C) that allows specific transcriptional initiation on a factor D (SL1)- and UBF-activated rRNA gene promoter. The in vitro transcriptional capacity of a preincubated rDNA promoter complex becomes exhausted very rapidly upon initiation of transcription. This is due to the rapid depletion of C* activity. In contrast, C* activity is not unstable in the absence of transcription, even in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). By using 3'dNTPs to specifically halt elongation, C* is seen to remain active through transcription complex assembly, initiation, and the first approximately 37 nucleotides of elongation, but it is inactivated before synthesis proceeds beyond approximately 40 nucleotides. When elongation is halted before this critical distance, the C* remains active and on that template complex, greatly extending the kinetics of transcription and generating manyfold more transcripts than would have been synthesized if elongation had proceeded past the critical distance where C* is inactivated. In complementary in vivo analysis under conditions where C* activity is not replenished, C* activity becomes depleted from cells, but this also occurs only when there is ongoing rDNA transcription. Thus, both in vitro and in vivo, the specific initiation-conferring component of the RNA polymerase I holoenzyme is used stoichiometrically in the transcription process.

scholarly journals A Step Subsequent to Preinitiation Complex Assembly at the Ribosomal RNA Gene Promoter Is Rate Limiting for Human RNA Polymerase I-Dependent Transcription

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2641-2649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostya I. Panov ◽  
J. Karsten Friedrich ◽  
Joost C. B. M. Zomerdijk
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Rna Polymerase I ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Initiation Of Transcription ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Rate Limiting

ABSTRACT The assembly, disassembly, and functional properties of transcription preinitiation complexes (PICs) of human RNA polymerase I (Pol I) play a crucial role in the regulation of rRNA gene expression. To study the factors and processes involved, an immobilized-promoter template assay has been developed that allows the isolation from nuclear extracts of functional PICs, which support accurate initiation of transcription. Immunoblotting of template-bound factors showed that these complexes contained the factors required to support initiation of transcription, SL1, upstream binding factor (UBF), and Pol I. We have demonstrated that, throughout a single round of transcription, SL1 and UBF remain promoter bound. Moreover, the promoter-bound SL1 and UBF retain the ability to function in transcription initiation. SL1 has a central role in the stable association of the PIC with the promoter DNA. The polymerase component of the PIC is released from the promoter during transcription yet is efficiently recycled and able to reinitiate from “poised” promoters carrying SL1 and UBF, since the PICs captured on the immobilized templates sustained multiple rounds of transcription. Kinetic analyses of initiation of transcription by Pol I revealed that Pol I-dependent transcription is rate limited in a step subsequent to recruitment and assembly of Pol I PICs. The rate of RNA synthesis is primarily determined by the rates at which the polymerase initiates transcription and escapes the promoter, referred to as promoter clearance. This rate-limiting step in Pol I transcription is likely to be a major target in the regulation of rRNA gene expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document